A Do Nothing President

Note: Over the weekend the SSL certificate for the site was supposed to renew, but something went wrong and it did not renew. This is why your browser got angry when you tried to access the site. H1B strikes again!


On Monday, Trump will be installed as president, so naturally everyone is speculating about what he will do once he gets the keys to the White House. Interestingly, much of the speculation is around the foreign policy issues he inherits. The neocons in the media are working hard to keep Ukraine in the news, so they are making claims about what Trump will and will not do with Putin. The Israel lobby wants Israel to be number one, so they are focusing on Iran.

What does not get noticed is Trump was elected on domestic issues. In the last election, Israel and Ukraine were far down the list for all voters. The number one issue was the economy. Immigration was the next big issue. The typical Trump voter looks at Ukraine as a boondoggle and Israel as an unsolvable problem. Logically, these two issues should be far down the list for Trump, but the media is focusing on them, which speaks to the power of their respective lobbies.

The first hint of what Trump has in mind for Ukraine came last month when Trump’s personal envoy to Ukraine and Russia said that it will take one hundred days to get a deal with Russia over Ukraine. This was a big shift from prior claims about Trump ending the war in a few days. Kellogg has also shifted with regards to what is happening in the war. The business about there being a stalemate has been dropped in favor of an acknowledgment that Ukraine is in trouble.

What the “one hundred days” tells us is Trump is not going to litter his first one hundred days with the Ukraine matter. It is a custom to assume that the first one hundred days of a new administration set the tone, so it is not an accident that Kellogg was suddenly using that phrasing. It is a signal that the Ukraine matter is not in the list of items that will take up the president’s time starting in January. To whom it was a signal is not all that clear and whether they understood it is unknown.

Time is the way to think about what Trump is planning for his second term. He has just one term and that means he has about eighteen months to get his domestic agenda pushed through Congress and the administrative state. Once we get to the summer of 2026 his party will be busy throwing the midterms. This means they will not pass anything the people want but instead focus on angering the base. After the election, Trump will get nothing from Congress.

This is a lesson Trump learned the hard way the first time. Once he won the election, he was swept up in a series of events that forced him to use his time in ways that had no benefit to him. He became the salesman wasting his days tending to customer service issues, rather than finding and closing new business. The number one skill for a salesman is time management. If you fail to manage your time, you fail. This is true for presidents, especially reformers like Trump.

It is why the signs point to Trump being something of a do-nothing president with regards to foreign policy issues. With Ukraine, he can do nothing, and it will resolve itself, as far as Trump is concerned. He inherited an unsalvageable mess from Biden, so no deal is better than any deal. Spending any time on it is a waste, so the one hundred days will probably turn into forever. The post-war deal with Russia will be left to the governments of Europe and the EU.

As for Israel, the signs are there for a delaying action. Kellogg was asked about it and reiterated the usual lines about pressuring Iran to abandon its nuclear program, which they largely did long ago. Michael Waltz, the new national security adviser, seems to get his opinions on Iran from Fox News. One suspects that he was picked because he will do what the boss says. Despite talk of new sanctions, Trump remains opposed to a war with Iran, or an Israeli war with Iran.

Another signal that the Middle East may be down there with Ukraine on the priority list is the fact Trump has signaled his disdain for Netanyahu. He was not invited to the inaugural and Trump has tweeted some untoward things about him. He also posted a link to Jeffrey Sachs calling Netanyahu a “deep, dark son of a bitch”, which is not the sort of thing you say about your friends. Trump has also been clear about wanting out of Syria, especially now that it is in chaos.

What may be shaping up for the first half of the Trump term is a policy of doing nothing with regards to the foreign policy hotspots. Trump and his advisors can answer questions and make the usual noises, but when it comes to investing time, the scarcest commodity Trump possesses, the administration will be stingy. These issues will get the absolute minimum amount of time and only so that they do not become a time waster for the domestic agenda.

It is looking like Trump learned that the most important card any president can play in politics is his attention. There is not much anyone can do if Trump simply de-prioritizes Ukraine, for example. “We are looking into it” works just as well against the schemers behind things like Ukraine as it does his own voters. Perhaps this time, instead of saying this regarding domestic issues, Trump will be saying it regarding foreign policy, to focus on the issues that matter to him.


If you like my work and wish to donate, you can buy me a beer. You can sign up for a SubscribeStar or a Substack subscription and get some extra content. You can donate via PayPal. My crypto addresses are here for those who prefer that option. You can send gold bars through the postal service to: Z Media LLC P.O. Box 1047 Berkeley Springs, WV 25411-3047. Thank you for your support!


To keep Z Man's voice alive for future generations, we’ve archived his writings from the original site at thezman.com. We’ve edited out ancillary links, advertisements, and donation requests to focus on his written content.

Comments (Historical)

The comments below were originally posted to thezman.com.

197 Comments

shivansh #439194 January 14, 2025 9:52 am 51
Dear thezman,I hope you are having a wonderful day. Please advise me that your certificate is renewed and I can close this case.Best regards,-Shivansh Agarwal
Filthie #439218 January 14, 2025 10:57 am 18
Thank you very much please! Come again!!!
Devi Agarwal #439319 January 14, 2025 3:46 pm 3
You are welcome sir. We appreciate your business. Devi Agarwal
mikebravo #439226 January 14, 2025 11:22 am 11
Dear Shivansh,Can you get my website to page 1 on Google please. Yours hopefullyA. Punter
Luthers Turd #439260 January 14, 2025 12:24 pm 6
No cooking in the room! Luther’s Turd
mmack #439287 January 14, 2025 1:36 pm 7
This post is a lie! I happen to know Microsoft closes service tickets without even bothering to ask. Heck, without bothering to fix the problem. Nice try “Shivansh”, you bot 🤖. 😏
Devi Agarwal #439318 January 14, 2025 3:44 pm 5
Sir, Microsoft does that because it is a US company. We Indians are proud of our customer service. Best regards,Devi Agarwal
mmack #439324 January 14, 2025 4:18 pm 3
ANOTHER BOT! EVERY American knows you would be “Dave”, not Devi. We’re on to you!
Ostei Kozelskii #439329 January 14, 2025 5:55 pm 5
Nowadays, he might be Devi with a blue dress on. (Lord have mercy…)
Devi Agarwal #439330 January 14, 2025 6:10 pm 2
It is a blue sari sir. Here is a picture – https://www.buzzfeed.com/soniathomas/look-at-these-stunning-pictures-of-transgender-classical-dan
Pozymandias #439301 January 14, 2025 2:36 pm 2
Thank you for coming, see you in hell!
Apex Predator #439341 January 14, 2025 7:10 pm 3
It is working, thanks! So now saar, please kindly do the needful and close the ticket. p.s. Don’t forget to show bobs and vegene!
usNthem #439195 January 14, 2025 9:54 am 49
If Trump back burners foreign policy – good. Actually DAMN good. US foreign policy has been an unmitigated disaster for decades. Rollback regulations, incentivize repatriation of industry, robustly secure and enforce the border and start rounding up and deporting illegals. That would be a decent start. Probably a pipe dream though…
pyrrhus #439211 January 14, 2025 10:45 am 14
Absolutely…Trump would be very wise to get out of all of these foreign entanglements, for nothing good can come of them for him…The problem is that Trump wasn’t a wise man last time, so where did this new found wisdom come from?! Perhaps an old dog can learn new tricks!? Let’s hope….
Zulu Juliet #439248 January 14, 2025 12:07 pm 19
I prepared for Trump to have learned nothing, but I hope the last four years of being endlessly fu**ed with and shot at has clarified and focused his thinking.
Ivan #439213 January 14, 2025 10:51 am -9
Someone please tell me why “incentivize”? Where did this come from, the people that start every sentence with “So..”, or throw in a random “I know right?” or “if you have any questions just ask myself”. WTF?? Previously, it was simply INCENT. In other words, “We can incent better performance through profit sharing”. Good grief.
anon #439227 January 14, 2025 11:22 am 8
I agree. To turn the noun “incentive” into a transitive verb “incentivize” sounds just ghastly to people of finer sensibilities and grammar Nazis. The proper usage for “incentivize repatriation of industry” would have been “provide incentives for the repatriation of industry”
The Wild Geese Howard #439239 January 14, 2025 11:53 am 6
Impactful is not a word. Performant is not a word.
KGB #439247 January 14, 2025 12:06 pm 7
How about “problematic”?
BigJimSportCamper #439262 January 14, 2025 12:27 pm 3
Or ‘reimagine’.
Ostei Kozelskii #439271 January 14, 2025 12:52 pm 15
You can always identify a Karen by her problematic glasses.
Piffle #439356 January 14, 2025 8:06 pm 1
I despise that style of glasses. Look at me please! I have glasses! I must be smart!
Horace #439305 January 14, 2025 2:56 pm 1
“Problematic” is problematical.
Paintersforms #439276 January 14, 2025 1:05 pm 4
They’ve made a bastard of the language!
Ostei Kozelskii #439311 January 14, 2025 3:21 pm 1
And a bitch of communication.
Paintersforms #439316 January 14, 2025 3:43 pm 5
Bitchize… sounds like something a rapper would say lol.
Ketchup-stained Griller #439344 January 14, 2025 7:21 pm 0
This is all unacceptable!!
Shaquanda #439353 January 14, 2025 8:00 pm 0
it be exhausting!
Ivan #439372 January 14, 2025 9:27 pm 0
That’s two dikes around here.
Derecha Disidente #439384 January 15, 2025 1:05 am 2
All this nouvelle vocabulary arose in tech sales and marketing meetings during the past 20 years. I’ve been there and born witness to it.
Ostei Kozelskii #439229 January 14, 2025 11:35 am 10
Incent and peppermint, the color of time…
CorkyAgain #439377 January 14, 2025 10:50 pm 1
And the smell of incent filled the room…
DLS #439233 January 14, 2025 11:48 am 12
I was in Italy a few months ago, and they use the word “allora” as their version of “so” to start a sentence. “So”, I guess annoying word fillers are universal. Recently, I have heard “comfortability”. Why use one syllable when six will do. Whenever someone would say “right?” at the end of a sentence, I used to say, “How would I know if it’s right, you’re the one saying it.” But I got exhausted from volume.
solitary saxon #439272 January 14, 2025 12:54 pm 5
OK then-
Piffle #439357 January 14, 2025 8:07 pm 0
I know, right?
Zaphod #439369 January 14, 2025 9:03 pm 4
Since we’re riffing on the street defecators, best begin every sentence withअच्छा(“accha”, the universal filler / agreement word in Hindi) and a sinuous head/neck wiggle. Never fails to charm the ladies. Derogatory slang for Indian in Hong Kong Cantonese is =阿叉(= “Ah Cha”) because that’s the regular sound pattern which jumps out from otherwise unintelligible blather. Sadly the younger generation are becoming ever more PC and averse to this kind of usage.
Ivan #439373 January 14, 2025 9:29 pm 1
Do the ululate that or cluck it?
Ivan #439374 January 14, 2025 9:30 pm 1
God help us its spreading!
Zulu Juliet #439249 January 14, 2025 12:09 pm 5
The first time I heard “weaponize” I mocked the fellow using it. Then it started showing up in print.
Dutchboy #439232 January 14, 2025 11:46 am 9
The somethings we have been doing have been a disaster, so full speed ahead with the nothings!
Fast-Turtle #439237 January 14, 2025 11:53 am 12
Remember when the old drooly groper Bush the elder had his wrinkly self strapped to someone and ‘jumped’ for the last time? I am picturing Nudelman and Vindman strapped together serving the country in a HALO mission over Ukraine. That will be the extent of Trump’s ‘foreigner policy’ the First 100. But to fool Putler, aim them head first, no chute. That’ll learn them Russkies!
Alzaebo #439331 January 14, 2025 6:19 pm 0
“Head first, no chute.” My gods. The American Tsar Bomba.
Zaphod #439370 January 14, 2025 9:06 pm 1
Oy Gesplattttt.
Jack Dobson #439200 January 14, 2025 10:11 am 29
I hope you are right. Israel and Ukraine are evil, troubled hellholes best left alone. I find troublesome the imperial ambitions over Greenland and to the degree they are real Canada, though. No one voted for Manifest Destiny The Sequel, and suspect these are to divert attention over the promised mass deportations, which are the whole ball of wax. Last go round Trump wasted time on tax cuts, so maybe he learned his capital is limited despite his history of bankruptcies.
DLS #439243 January 14, 2025 12:00 pm 7
I have no problem with the Greenland push. They have a lot of minerals they can’t afford to extract. Canada and the Panama Canal statements are “art of the deal” negotiation tactics to get better agreements.
Jack Dobson #439258 January 14, 2025 12:23 pm 20
I see it as imperialism and oppose it root and branch. The 60,000 or so in Greenland don’t need to be GAE subjects.
Mycale #439273 January 14, 2025 12:54 pm 12
Aren’t they part of the EU? They’re already GAE subjects. There is an American military base in Greenland IIRC – they’re already occupied.
Zaphod #439371 January 14, 2025 9:10 pm 3
Someone on X was having a bit of fun with David Goldman asking for a wager on whether first uniquely American cultural enrichment to set up shop in Greenland would be Chabad or Dollar Tree. I figured Chabad’s tunnel boring machine would breach in the centre of Nuuk just as the Danish flag comes down.
Luthers Turd #439263 January 14, 2025 12:28 pm 1
And with what funds do we purchase Greenland? Oh yeah, a trillion here, a trillion there, pretty soon it’s just small change… Luther’s Turd
Alzaebo #439332 January 14, 2025 6:21 pm 3
“Luther’s Turd” as a signoff leaves a terrible aftertaste As in, wtf was he talking about…don’t care
The Wild Geese Howard #439244 January 14, 2025 12:02 pm 15
In purely pragmatic terms, there are potential natural resource advantages to pursuing deals with Canada and Greenland. The main thrust is probably Greenland, because it is a potential vehicle for skirting China’s dominance in rare earth reserves and processing as well as sidestepping the environmental lunatics in the US that will block renewed rare earth recovery and processing efforts. The advantage of no international border between Canada and the US with regard to tar sands is pretty obvious. The problem is that most Canadians have the political outlook of Californians.
Templar #439256 January 14, 2025 12:20 pm 13
The problem is that most Canadians have the political outlook of Californians. Not so much the ones who actually live in oil country, though.
Pozymandias #439308 January 14, 2025 3:03 pm 10
The Canada thing only makes sense if you’re breaking it up first. We take the oil provinces and let the various tribes of homosexuals and Frenchmen (I repeat myself) carve up the rest into a sort of sex-tourism version of the Balkans.I had never given any thought to Greenland. As someone else pointed out, if we’re buying it, we don’t have the money. That’s like the price of 10 or 12 Ukraine adventures. Maybe the idea is to base the dollar on mineral wealth in a sort of modernized return to the gold standard? Every dollar can be redeemed in a certain amount of rare earth elements?
Piffle #439358 January 14, 2025 8:09 pm 4
“various tribes of homosexuals and Frenchmen (I repeat myself) “ Hey! I have French Canadians in the family!! And…you’re correct. “a sort of sex-tourism version of the Balkans” Nobody is going to Canada for that, although Montreal did have that red light district for quite a while.
Templar #439428 January 15, 2025 10:51 am 1
Hey! I have French Canadians in the family!! And…you’re correct. Quebec girls have areputation, or so I’ve been led to believe (can’t speak from personal experience). I guess that’s what happens when you have an imperative to breed like rabbits for centuries to keep the wilderness (and the bloody English) at bay but then suddenly lose your religion because it’s the 60s.
The Wild Geese Howard #439327 January 14, 2025 5:01 pm 9
This is why it would be smarter to bring in Alberta, Saskatchewan, and Manitoba in as separate states and leave the rest of the provinces as some kind of economic wasteland.
Alzaebo #439336 January 14, 2025 6:35 pm 3
No way, brah. Before legalization, the Canadian government grew its potent marijuana in the cave laboratories of British Columbia. Can’t have Greater America without Canadian California!Like, dude!
Alzaebo #439334 January 14, 2025 6:28 pm 1
You mean Kern County (Bakersfield)? Oops, sorry, scorching-azzed Bakedfield looks nothing like Alberta.
Templar #439538 January 15, 2025 9:33 pm 0
You mean Kern County (Bakersfield)? Oops, sorry, scorching-azzed Bakedfield looks nothing like Alberta. Oops, sorry, scorching-azzed Bakedfield looks nothing like Alberta. I mean Alberta (and to a lesser degree, Saskatchewan). I’m not really sure what you mean by referencing Bakersfield.
Dutchboy #439335 January 14, 2025 6:35 pm 0
Mostly brown Californians (> half the state). Canadians are more like Minnesotans or Bay Staters: white people with wokism.
Templar #439429 January 15, 2025 10:52 am 0
Mostly brown Californians (> half the state). I was talking about Canadians, in Canadian oil country, not Californians.
Jack Dobson #439257 January 14, 2025 12:21 pm 20
There needs to be a wall on the northern border, too. Most of Canada is far to the left of Vermont.
ray #439288 January 14, 2025 1:37 pm 6
I want a moat along with it.
Alzaebo #439337 January 14, 2025 6:39 pm 6
They’ll just skate across it in winter.
Captain Willard #439266 January 14, 2025 12:37 pm 10
Jack: printing funny money to buy or lease Greenland would be good business. Agree on Canada. On Panama, we should have never given it away.
Steve #439268 January 14, 2025 12:45 pm 8
Just stopping the flow of money and weapons to Ukraine and Israel would be a great plenty of action. That’s not a do-nothing. He will be fighting nominal Republicans all the way, plus Democrats wanting to make Trump fail. Greenland is an awesome idea. Anyone who won’t self-deport is dropped off in an orange jumpsuit on some ice field in the middle of the island. He’ll have plenty of company — that’s where we will exile all the Democrats.
Jack Dobson #439279 January 14, 2025 1:14 pm 7
Greenland is an awesome idea. Anyone who won’t self-deport is dropped off in an orange jumpsuit on some ice field in the middle of the island. That might change my mind if it were possible.
KGB #439304 January 14, 2025 2:52 pm 10
Since diversity is our greatest strength, one imagines that resettling several million sub-Saharans and mestizos there will soon make Greenland the envy of the developed world. It can’t hurt to try.
Ostei Kozelskii #439312 January 14, 2025 3:23 pm 6
It’ll be the breadbasket of the North Atlantic in nothing flat…
Pozymandias #439339 January 14, 2025 6:47 pm 3
The sight of skinny blacks and Squatemalans plowing up the glaciers to sow corn and sorghum might make it worthwhile.
Piffle #439359 January 14, 2025 8:10 pm 2
This thread is hilarious.
CorkyAgain #439379 January 14, 2025 11:14 pm 0
We can call it Rura Penthe. (Star Trek reference)
Pozymandias #439310 January 14, 2025 3:08 pm 2
Meh, we already have our own Siberia in Alaska to build the camps in.
Steve #439323 January 14, 2025 4:18 pm 9
Camps? We don’t need steenking camps! I’m thinking put the first aliquot down with about half the number of tents and sleeping bags and let them figure it out themselves. The rest all set down with nothing. I predict in a few years, the Europeans will give us some kind of award for bringing polar bears back from the brink of extinction.
Paintersforms #439281 January 14, 2025 1:17 pm 4
I wonder how things would’ve turned out if the invasion of Canada had succeeded. Seriously. Maybe there’d be two Americas, maybe the Civil War never happens, who knows. Lebensraum for everybody!
Steve #439315 January 14, 2025 3:29 pm 5
Interesting question. The Underground Railroad no longer ends in Canada. Each state that decides to oppose the Fugitive Slave Act has to keep them. One thinks the folly of such a policy would have been apparent rather quickly.
Hemid #439286 January 14, 2025 1:35 pm 4
I remember when I was a kid the television saying (over maudlin music) that America was obligated to take in and nurse Greenland, like a terminally ill orphan, because we’d ruined it forever when a bomber crashed at Thule and low-level nuked the place. It was PBS, so Greenland annexation was the official government line, circa 1980.Coverage of Trump’s Greenland bit—which he’s been running for many years now—hasn’t mentioned this, maybe because media “don’t know anything” as Ben Rhodes famously said (but someone could tell them), maybe for the usual partisan reasons (Trump is not allowed to be understood), or maybe because they’re not free to speak negatively of nuclear things right now and remind the people of the old official line(s).
Jack Dobson #439314 January 14, 2025 3:26 pm 1
maybe because they’re not free to speak negatively of nuclear things right now If Kubrick remade DR. STRANGELOVE, the Chill Wills character would be trying to prevent a nuclear first strike.
Mike #439325 January 14, 2025 4:28 pm 2
Slim Pickens. The great Slim Pickens.
Jack Dobson #439328 January 14, 2025 5:44 pm 1
Yes, thanks.
Alzaebo #439340 January 14, 2025 6:48 pm 2
Heh!Once got cold-cocked at a party thrown by a Chillus Willis. Down like the proverbial log. (Neither Chillus nor the Bell Biv deVoes tripleganging on me from behind were white…thank gosh my Skins showed up. Right real Swastika yobbo thrashers they were, put those Doc Martins to good use.)
Alzaebo #439333 January 14, 2025 6:25 pm 2
from the canal to the glacier, the U.S. will replace her Make America Great(er) Eretz Ymerica
Diversity Heretic #439197 January 14, 2025 9:58 am 25
I frequently reflect on the situation that Lyndon Johnson found himself in after his landslide win in 1964. Johnson’s priority was his Great Society domestic program, but his administration bogged down and eventually collapsed over Vietnam. (I think that the Great Society programs were, by and large, badly conceived, but theywereJohnson’spriority.) Johnson could have pretty much walked away from Vietnam in 1965, blamed the mess on the Kennedy advisors whom he despised, and permit Vietnamese unification. By 1968 no one would have remembered.If Trump is smart, he’ll follow the Z-man’s counsel concentrate on his domestic priorities, and delegate the foreign policy stuff to competent people, which probably means excluding the “intelligence community.” My concern is that Secretary of State Marco Rubio is easily manipulable and will keep getting into messes that Trump will have to put right.
Jeffrey Zoar #439199 January 14, 2025 10:07 am 18
Vietnam was supposed to be easy. No American soldier would have set foot there had the regime had any idea what it was in for. I think some folks felt the same way about Ukraine a few short years ago. Perhaps the LBJ analogy is more appropriate for Biden. And in other ways too.
Mycale #439203 January 14, 2025 10:19 am 25
They expected that the Russian economy would collapse due to sanctions at the same time the Russian military collapsed due to the Ukrainian resistance (which was indeed very formidable in the beginning). Neither happened, and once they did not, which we knew in the first six months or so, it became obvious that this was yet another quagmire for the neocons and others holding 300 year old grudges against the Romanovs.
Tars Tarkas #439221 January 14, 2025 11:00 am -5
It has been a quagmire for the Russians too. Putin sent in a token force and expected capitulation within days of the SMO. Here we are 3 years later, probably over 100k dead or wounded, the storage yards near empty, parts of Russia being occupied. The benefits Russia has gained are largely totally unseen, at least if you take their rationale seriously. The rationale was having NATO on their border and the risk of a NATO invasion. But if successful, the Ukraine war only prevents that risk. So it will appear to the average Russian that absolutely nothing changed.
DLS #439246 January 14, 2025 12:05 pm 29
Russia is filled with Russians, so they have some pride in Putin’s gambits. His main success was showing the world that Globohomo is a paper tiger, militarily and sanctions-wise.
Tars Tarkas #439289 January 14, 2025 1:39 pm 4
I’m not really criticizing Russia here, just that it has been a quagmire that was totally unexpected in the beginning. Wars almost never work out the way the ruling class hopes or at least what they say publicly. Given the opening stages of the war (SMO), Putin really believed it. Britain was ruined by a war it started and was on the winning side.
kaiser #439297 January 14, 2025 2:15 pm 0
Britain post WW2 was in a much healthier shape than the US of today. Not sure WW2 is the issue.Britain did not invade Poland so I question your chronolgy. Sweden did not fight in WW2 and look at it!Or Portugal.France didn’t do much fighting in WW2 either.
Tars Tarkas #439299 January 14, 2025 2:27 pm 13
Poland would not have been invaded if not for British (and French) interference. Britain wanted a war and they got it.Regardless of the relative shape of Britain after 1945 vs America today, Britain would have been in much better shape in 1945 had the war not happened. They didn’t even end rationing until well into the 1950s. Hitler’s demands for Poland were absolutely reasonable and any other leader would have made the same demands.
Piffle #439361 January 14, 2025 8:19 pm -4
“Hitler’s demands for Poland were absolutely reasonable and any other leader would have made the same demands.” Demanding a sovereign country bifurcate itself for the sake of a community on it’s Eastern border is not reasonable. Hilter was open that he wanted a greater self sufficient Germany that had enough farmland. The plan was always looking East, to conquering and removal of the European peoples that he considered to be non-people. Britain’s entry into the war is still up for debate about whether or not it was good idea. However, we can’t redeem Hitler on the mistakes of Churchill.
Templar #439537 January 15, 2025 9:29 pm 0
Demanding a sovereign country bifurcate itself for the sake of a community on it’s Eastern border is not reasonable. By that logic neither Poland nor any of the former constituents of the Austro-Hungarian Empire should ever have been granted sovereignty. The plan was always looking East, to conquering and removal of the European peoples that he considered to be non-people. Britain’s entry into the war is still up for debate about whether or not it was good idea. Britain’s entry into the war is still up for debate about whether or not it was good idea. Man, I remember when I was still naive enough to believe in the foundational myths of the GAE…
Piffle #439360 January 14, 2025 8:15 pm -2
“I’m not really criticizing Russia here, just that it has been a quagmire that was totally unexpected in the beginning.” I’m not sure that it was totally unexpected. The Russians seem to have moved with great intelligence. I don’t blame them for hoping for blitzkrieg with their C list military though.
Luthers Turd #439265 January 14, 2025 12:36 pm 9
Perhaps, but the destruction of that globo-homo kleptocracy run by the piano man may well be worth the sacrifice.The SMO has only emboldened the emerging BRICS alliance. Look at the Global South embracing a new world alignment devoid of the rules based order of fools. Luther’s Turd
Penitent Man #439278 January 14, 2025 1:10 pm 3
OT. Try to look at the bright side on BRICS. If they become a force to be reckoned with they will likely have to change the acronym to BRRIC. Stability will have to be restored to southern Africa in order to exert control over the continent and extract resources. None of the participant governments mollycoddle inept ethnic quagmires and “human rights”. BRRhodesiaIC.
kaiser #439298 January 14, 2025 2:18 pm 3
Ah yes; the morally upright BRICS.
Alzaebo #439342 January 14, 2025 7:13 pm 1
As well as scrupulously competent, we get our best programmers from there.
Horace #439307 January 14, 2025 3:03 pm 14
Yes, they have suffered ~100k dead, but they have gained 7.5 million new white citizens with the prospect of adding that many again if they annex all the way to Odessa. The materials cost is irrelevant because they have more metal and energy than they could use in a thousand years. They have won the only metrics that matter: manpower, soft power (respect around the world), and amplified internal social cohesion.
Lakelander #439326 January 14, 2025 5:01 pm 7
Had BoJo the Clown (acting on GAE’s behalf) not disrupted the deal that they had established in Istanbul in March 2022, Russia’s token force would have led to an acceptable resolution. Since that didn’t happen, they had to go back to the drawing board, retool and apply the lessons learned to improve their military and it’s industrial base. Sure they’ve had losses, but look at them rolling now. The most battle hardened military force in the world.Why does no one talk about the debacle this has been for NATO? 8 years they spent building and training the Ukraine army for this conflict only to get completely destroyed in the first 6 months. Their military industrial base has been shown to be wildly inadequate especially after the US destroyed Nordstream exacerbating production issues in the most important EU country. Member states are increasingly divided, rejecting any more money/weapons for the Ukraine project, claiming that it’s a lost cause. Trump’s now asking them to increase NATO spending to ridiculous levels, which most won’t be able to afford. The alliance is on the way out and people still want us to think Russia is the big loser here. No, Europe is the biggest loser by far.
Alzaebo #439343 January 14, 2025 7:16 pm 2
Europe is the biggest loser…for now.In the long run, let us hope this leads to Europe’s nationalist renewal, and then may all the Brown world tremble.
c matt #439346 January 14, 2025 7:27 pm 3
I wonder if Trump’s demand for increased EU states’ contributions to NATO is his way of making it implode?
CorkyAgain #439378 January 14, 2025 11:00 pm 1
Russia now controls the mineral resources of the Donbas.
Jack Dobson #439261 January 14, 2025 12:25 pm 7
Europe has been weakened, which benefits both Russia and the GAE. I suspect that was a primary motivator for the latter.
Mycale #439284 January 14, 2025 1:23 pm 8
I think that weakening the EU – blowing up the pipeline, making it more dependent on the USA, implementing a soft version of the Morgenthau plan, etc., was very much a consolation prize for the GAE.
ray #439202 January 14, 2025 10:19 am 45
‘(I think that the Great Society programs were, by and large, badly conceived, but theywereJohnson’spriority.)’ ‘Badly conceived’ lol. Like the L.A. fires are ‘inconveniently hot’. That Great Society agenda, with its Civil Rights and Immigration Acts (’64 and ’65 respectively), fundamentally transformed the U.S. into the diversity, race-grievance, and feminist State it currently is. Those three lesbo fembots named Kristin running the LAFD are everywhere now, empowered to the max. KareNation. You let ’em, they’ll burn the whole nation down and blame you when it’s done. As for LBJ, he was a traitor to God and country.
Ostei Kozelskii #439238 January 14, 2025 11:53 am 23
At root, the Civil Rights Movement liberated a population of dumb savages to prey upon the intelligent, lawful and productive elements of society. And in the process, the latter lost a great deal of their freedom.
Dr_Mantis_Toboggan_MD #439283 January 14, 2025 1:23 pm 8
Truer words have NEVER been spoken. Amazing way to sum up decades of civil “rights” horror inflicted on white people.
ray #439291 January 14, 2025 1:59 pm 10
It also greatly enriched and empowered — to status of supremacy — roughly one-half of the population, to detriment of the other half. The female half of the U.S. became one of New Amerika’s Protected Classes, in adversarial relationship with the male half. Bingo, females now are the moral and spiritual betters of males and their legal and social superiors. Sixty years of don’t need no man has consequences. You hearing me today, Malibu?
Dutchboy #439375 January 14, 2025 10:06 pm 6
The civil rights movement was a Jewish movement with black frontmen. Siccing blacks on white people and setting women against men were features of the movement, not bugs.
Brandon Laskow #439267 January 14, 2025 12:44 pm 14
Kristin, Kristine, and Kristina. You can’t make this stuff up.
Ostei Kozelskii #439274 January 14, 2025 12:59 pm 8
More evidence of the simulation thesis. Either that or God as the Divine Jokester.
ray #439292 January 14, 2025 2:01 pm 3
Oh, that’s the Boss’ signature. Rubbing it in the nation’s face.
LineInTheSand #439306 January 14, 2025 2:58 pm 2
Is this just a coincidence or does ‘Kristin’ and it’s variants correlate with lesbianism or manly women?
Ostei Kozelskii #439313 January 14, 2025 3:26 pm 4
That would be Butchin, Butchine, and Butchina…
Piffle #439362 January 14, 2025 8:20 pm 1
Haha!
Ivan #439216 January 14, 2025 10:55 am 7
“I think that the Great Society programs were, by and large, badly conceived, but they were Johnson’s priority.” And the US still reels from badly conceived TGS. Speak of the administrative state.
Ostei Kozelskii #439235 January 14, 2025 11:49 am 5
But could LBJ really have walked away from Nam? There’s a school of thought that JFK was going to do that and it cost him his life.
ray #439293 January 14, 2025 2:03 pm 5
They finally took JFK out because he publicly threatened both the CIA and the cryptocracy in general. Not because of Nam policy.
Ostei Kozelskii #439300 January 14, 2025 2:29 pm 6
I think it was all of a piece. Nam was a mighty big grift for the MIC, and they didn’t like the idea of having that delectable brisket sandwich dashed from their lips right as they were about to bite into it.
ray #439322 January 14, 2025 4:10 pm 8
Yes. It was the things we discussed, and a number of other elements besides. But threatening to ‘shatter the CIA into a thousand pieces’, well, things happened quickly after that. JFK knew it was, and is, a spiritual war. And he knew that the intel establishment — mostly Ivy League secret-society types — was neither on the side of God nor of traditional America. The America imposed since ’63 has been Their America. That was the year of the real coup, and nothing has been the same since. You had to have been alive back then to appreciate it fully.
Alzaebo #439345 January 14, 2025 7:25 pm 5
Lady Bird Johnson owned the company that did 90% of the heavy equipment transport and supply to Vietnam. When done, they just left ’em there. It would cost too much to bring used equipment back.
CorkyAgain #439380 January 14, 2025 11:23 pm 2
In 1971 I was assigned to an Army depot in Da Nang and remember hearing rumors about Lady Bird’s involvement with Pacific Architects & Engineers, which had some facilities there. I believe that’s the company you’re talking about, but I couldn’t find anything on the web which confirms it. There does seem to have been a CIA connection however.
c matt #439347 January 14, 2025 7:30 pm 4
There were a lot of powerful groups he rubbed the wrong way. Pretty much sealed his fate.
Maxda #439269 January 14, 2025 12:48 pm 6
JFK was reportedly ready to pull the plug on Vietnam and defang the agency pushing for intervention. Given his fate, I don’t think Johnson was going to do that.
Alzaebo #439348 January 14, 2025 7:32 pm 3
Don’t forget, the Vietnam of the Intel Community was Indonesia…where they took out another sitting President with a revolution. They needed its banks to launder the Air America opium trade from the original Golden Triangle. (Along with protecting the oil platforms in the Mekong Delta for the Six Sisters.) For the IC, Southeast Asia was a turf war over black budget resources.Obama’s mother and grandmother played a heavy role in it.
Wkathman #439214 January 14, 2025 10:52 am 22
I predict Trump’s fan club will get the same Trump they had during his original term as grand poohbah — a largely ineffectual fella who, at best, barely moves the ball in the direction his supporters would prefer to see it go. The teeth have been removed from the office of the presidency. The technocratic oligarchs at the top have rigged things so well that one guy (ceremoniously dubbed “president”) cannot possibly interfere with their machinations. It often feels as if the entire Trump phenomenon is an expertly orchestrated distraction.
Ostei Kozelskii #439242 January 14, 2025 11:56 am 9
Spot on. Outside of appointing judges, the presidency has largely been emasculated. The Power Structure runs the show. Therefore, the focus on Trump, although understandable, is largely a red herring.
Steve #439270 January 14, 2025 12:51 pm 10
Exactly. Ukrainian ultra-patriot Vindman proved just how much power a well-placed cog has.
Alzaebo #439352 January 14, 2025 7:56 pm 3
I think Trump intends to make some serious inroads…Trump and Putin have lit a fire under all the nationalists’ asses. Look at Europe. The real Resistance is coming together and, though shaky and uncertain, starting to make itself heard. Of course the neocons’ bastard offspring, the Luttnick/Ellison/Thiel/Fink crowd, are fighting to take the captain’s wheel. That’s a given, just part of the calculation. It doesn’t mean they own us yet.
DLS #439251 January 14, 2025 12:11 pm 7
Probably. If Trump doesn’t defang the deep state and “intelligence” hydras, but settles for his guys running them for 4 years, the leftist onslaught will resume shortly.
Dr_Mantis_Toboggan_MD #439285 January 14, 2025 1:35 pm 8
I predict we’re going to get a nice interregnum from the “progress” of history and nothing more. A four-year break from the madness is going to be a nice respite before the coming collapse.
Alzaebo #439355 January 14, 2025 8:04 pm 2
If we’re even partially prepared for the looming collapse, then, it doesn’t need to be a collapse like the messianics want. Let’s hope to steer things in our direction.
joey jünger #439222 January 14, 2025 11:00 am 19
There’s a video of Trump—I think first circulated by Jimmy Dore—showing him talking off the cuff, on a stage, about Israel. In the video he expresses his surprise that Netanyahu, despite his assertions, doesn’t want a deal, while the Palestinians were desperate to take any deal. It really shows how innocent Trump is in some ways.Someone as aggressively online as him is bound to eventually stumble onto one of *those* videos that jump containment at Telegram and end up in compilations on YouTube. You know the ones: IDF soldiers beating up Palestinians in wheelchairs or confused kids with Downs-Syndrome; telling people to come out with their hands up, then shooting them down and laughing after they fall; there’s even a trend with Israeli soldiers where they time buildings to explode in the background while they propose marriage to their girls back home, a sort of “fireworks” display.The craziest part of all this is that same Jewish-Americans who go nuts over the Proud Boys or the Klan (do they even still exist?) refuse to see the irony. The other day I saw a movie about the white separatist group,The Order, starring Jude Law. It was a relatively good, evenhanded picture, but when I left the theater I could only shake my head. “These guys were basically pikers compared to the Mossad or Irgun. They killed like five people over the course of several years in their quest to create an ethnostate. Israel’s killed forty-thousand not to get an ethnostate, but just because they can’t stand the stink of their neighbors.”The best strategy to turn Trump on the issue is the same one as always: go for the ego. Someone in media is obviously seeding the news with “reports” (re: made-up b.s.) about Musk being the decisionmaker behind the scenes. The goal is obviously to drive a wedge between Trump and Musk (which, incidentally is fine with me.) Someone should try getting “Bibi’s Bitch,” out there into the public sphere, since not only does it have that plosive alliteration, but it’s a wedge that definitely needs to be driven.
Zulu Juliet #439245 January 14, 2025 12:05 pm 17
My sense is the American people don’t care about endless meddling around the world and would be content with giving it a good leaving alone. Of course the media will try to make things a crisis, but aside from the folks who want to make sure they agree with the TV, that can be ignored. America has been meddling for the last thirty-five years, to no ones benefit except the meddlers.
Ketchup-stained Griller #439385 January 15, 2025 8:59 am 2
Only 35??
Fast-Turtle #439231 January 14, 2025 11:44 am 17
IMO Ukraine is in the sunk cost column on the national spreadsheet. Israel is in the fixed cost column. Get me cheap energy, make me not have to look and the Island of Misfit Toys every fucking day nor hear their diktats. Get someone in a perp walk. Someone held accountable. I’d settle for a few leftwing shill scapegoats.
ray #439295 January 14, 2025 2:11 pm 1
Good attitude. Gotta start somewhere so yeah, turn a batch of lower-lever operatives. Then light them up.
Filthie #439228 January 14, 2025 11:26 am 17
Hrrrrmmmmm….There’s a lot of truth there… and not disagreeing with any of it… but one has to look beyond Blumpf when making predictions about this kind of stuff. You have to look at what the bad guys are doing too. While it is true that they are going to continue to call the shots on some things… they are in very, very deep trouble. Right now all they can do is continue to throw sand and monkey wrenches into the works in hopes of turning the Dirt People against Trump. They are doing that with gay abandon because it always worked in the past. The problem is that people are seeing that too.The times have changed. The left has now gone unstable and everyone knows it. Biden alienated the shite out of the electorate by pardoning his son and every mass murderer on death row. He did it again when he handed out presidential medals to his fart suckers like Soros, Hillary, Satan and I think Cornelius Rye got one too. The billions for the Kraine and Israel stuck in the craw of people caught in the floods and fires. Gavin Newsom is as popular as Justin Turdo in his own shitlib state. He has to try to appear statesmanlike while his vibrant and diverse cohorts in the fire department give the finger to the people that rely on them and voted for them.No salesman can succeed if the team supporting him are all clowns. We are reaching an inflection point in the west. As we slide into the abyss – the people responsible are going to be driven out and slowly replaced – or there will be a bloody, nasty revolution and then they will be replaced. Trump’s team has already ‘set the tone’ promising oversight, hirings, firings and replacement of the defective cogs in the establishment regime. Turdo has been turfed in Canada. Macron, Starmer, and whoever the current goof in Germany is – are all on the verge of being swept away too. The cloud people are ALL on very, very thin ice. We saw this when Elon said he will so replace you with street shitting pajeets and f*** you if you don’t like it.Afghanistan and its disastrous conclusion went away. The argument that the Kraine and the Israeli war need to go away too is an incredibly powerful one. I am seeing growing evidence that parties are starting to matter less and less – people are in so much trouble now that they have to actually look at the problems, see results – or else. The media no longer controls public opinion and all they can do is push retarded narratives.The pendulum is starting to swing. I don’t see Trump in front of it… I see him positioning himself behind it. Some good things may start to happen soon.
Hokkoda #439220 January 14, 2025 11:00 am 15
Mass deportations and confirmations are the focus. Trump has zero leverage on Russia short of a deal that creates a team-up with them to hang the people responsible for that debacle. There is value in getting some daylight between Russia and China. On Israel, the public has voted: stay out of it. I would not be surprised to hear he wants an Egypt-Israel styled peace treaty with Iran. Those take time, but it would largely end the fighting over there.Greenland is Alaska-east. Odds are good that it sits on massive energy deposits. We’re not buying Greenland for the views. Trump is after the liquid gold.He’s been very quiet about Lawfare. Something is being planned, I think.Getting the military out of the ditch is important, too.On the economy: tariffs! Tariffs for everybody!
Steve #439282 January 14, 2025 1:23 pm -1
“On the economy: tariffs! Tariffs for everybody!” I was with you right up until your last sentence. Calling for tariffs is worse than calling for pirates. At least the pirates will spend the booty on piratey things. Give the money to government, they will import more foreigners, and entangle us further in foreign affairs. Ya gotta starve the beast. Feeding him is a terrible idea.
Tars Tarkas #439303 January 14, 2025 2:39 pm 10
The purpose of tariffs is not raising revenue. The purpose is to make our producers competitive with foreign producers. Sadly, I don’t think it will work. We’ve had 55 years of pogroms on the productive economy. Undoing it will not be easy or accomplished in 4 years.
Steve #439321 January 14, 2025 4:00 pm 0
Tariffs can’t do that. All it can do is impoverish Americans, and at the same time, raise money for the guys who import our replacements and interfere globally. If your goal is to make American products competitive, a far better idea would be decriminalizing the stealing of foreign goods. Won’t take merchants very long to stop carrying anything foreign, and we haven’t enriched our oppressor
Piffle #439365 January 14, 2025 8:41 pm 4
Legalizing stealing might have some unexpected consequences, don’t you think? Americans have been brainwashed on tariffs, in part because that Walmart cheap gene we seem to have installed. All sane countries who value their sovereignty and economy have tariffs. And yes, people have to pay more money for stuff. It’s okay, we just need to take deep breaths. They also have jobs with which to the pay the money.
Steve #439383 January 15, 2025 12:53 am -1
Of course there will be consequences. There are no solutions, only tradeoffs. Walmart will stop selling foreign goods, so before long there won’t be anything to steal. Amazon would have to quit importing, since employees could just have friends back up to the dock doors. Etc. The tradeoff is a temporary, self-correcting boon to Jonquarius vs. a permanent wealth transfer to the guys persecuting the J6ers. and hiring another 86,000 IRS agents, andbuilding fusion centers to track our every move and expense.
Dutchboy #439376 January 14, 2025 10:11 pm 1
Paul Craig Roberts thinks a corporate tax based on domestic production would be superior to tariffs. The more the production in the USA, the lower the rate.
Steve #439382 January 15, 2025 12:41 am 1
I assume he means the greater fraction of production in the US the lower the rate. Otherwise it’s a giveaway to MNCs.
Piffle #439366 January 14, 2025 8:42 pm 1
Tariffs do work. I agree with you though that it’s hard to fix in 4 years what’s been deconstructed in 55. Plus who knows what the next President will do. It’s worth trying though.
Citizen of a Silly Country #439192 January 14, 2025 9:43 am 15
Trump wasted his political capital on tax cuts as well the last time around. I think that he realizes that was a mistake as tax cuts weren’t a big issue. Trump wants to go down in the history books. That’s not going to happen with another tax cut. Immigration reform and Greenland would do the trick.
Presbyterj #439198 January 14, 2025 10:06 am 16
Agree. Tax cuts are the “ same old same old” especially with the real base of Trump’s victory.The Third Worldization of the country and putting the crazies back in the cages are the real issues.
Citizen of a Silly Country #439207 January 14, 2025 10:28 am 14
Yep. Trump won’t go down in history by cutting the marginal rate from 22% to 20%. And he knows it.
Ivan #439215 January 14, 2025 10:52 am 6
Well, he has already gone down in history. The rest is gimme pudding.
Citizen of a Silly Country #439224 January 14, 2025 11:12 am 18
Right now, he’ll go down as a disrupter who didn’t actually accomplish anything. That’s probably not what he wants.
Tars Tarkas #439217 January 14, 2025 10:55 am -2
We need massive tax increases just to stop growing the debt, let alone paying it down.
Citizen of a Silly Country #439225 January 14, 2025 11:14 am 12
Nope. We’re screwed with the debt. If you raise taxes or cut spending enough to really dent the deficit, you’d cause a recession, which would lower GDP and thus, ironically, make the debt to GDP situation even worse. We’ve seen this before. At some point, there’s no normal way out. You have to have inflation combined with low rates.
DLS #439241 January 14, 2025 11:55 am 8
Exactly. I expect more circular adjustments to make the official inflation lies even greater. In the 1990s they installed three into the formulas: substitution effect, calling part of inflation technological improvement, and substituting housing costs with rent estimates. Coincidentally, these all lower the official inflation figures. If we were still using the formulas from Carter’s era, Biden would have much higher figures, as anyone who goes to the grocery store already knows.
Citizen of a Silly Country #439254 January 14, 2025 12:13 pm 7
I have no idea how they’ll do it, but inflation combined with very low interest rates is the easiest way out of this. Theoretically, Congress could come up with a deal where the US very slowly raises taxes and cuts spending to address the deficits w/o tanking the economy. It would take a decade or more of sound policy and everyone working together. That won’t happen. Defaulting on the debt is simply impossible, so you’re left with inflation and financial repression. It’s been done before. It’s not anything new. It can – and will be – done.
Tars Tarkas #439259 January 14, 2025 12:24 pm 9
Don’t forget hedonic adjustment and geometric weighting. That substitution is a killer too. It turns a measure of inflation into a measure of surviving. Actual examples of substitution in the inflation numbers are steak and hotdogs. If you have to buy hotdogs because steak went up too much, you are experiencing a large drop in standard of living.Hedonic adjustments have been used to take an item that has gone up and price and adjusted to that over at the BLS, the price actually fell.It’s not just inflation. It’s GDP. It’s unemployment. It’s productivity. Every number the BLS comes out with is pure fantasy. It’s more of a psyop than meaningful statistics. All are used to manage expectations.
c matt #439349 January 14, 2025 7:34 pm 0
BLS, short for BLSHT
Steve #439277 January 14, 2025 1:08 pm 5
It could be avoided but I don’t expect it to. Shutting down government offices wholesale would be a short-term disruption, but not nearly as deep as most think. Overpaid government workers are a major cause of high-priced housing. Government office buildings are a major cause of high-priced commercial RE. And economically speaking, most produce not goods, but bads. So long as they didn’t do something stupid to extend the amount of time the ex-government workers could afford to stay home on the couch, those people will have to get jobs producing something of value to society, for a change.
Tars Tarkas #439290 January 14, 2025 1:47 pm 14
Unfortunately, when you cut a government bureaucracy, they will then concentrate the cuts in the most public facing way. Like if your school board gets a cut, they aren’t going to clean out the local BOE, they’re going to fire teachers, cut or eliminate extracurricular activities, not buy new books and other supplies etc. Whatever public-facing benefits any bureaucracy happens to create are the very first things that bureaucracy will cut. The primary purpose of any bureaucracy, be it public or private is to protect itself from cuts and expand its budget and scope.
Steve #439317 January 14, 2025 3:43 pm 6
That’s true, which is why you need to yank the entire department out by the roots. Start with DoE (both), HHS, HUD, FDA. Lock the doors, put the buildings up for sale. I’d include Agriculture, in the first tranche, but they run Food Stamps / SNAP and I don’t think we are quite ready for the diversity to get all uppity. Though I suppose it has to happen sometime…
Jeffrey Zoar #439208 January 14, 2025 10:33 am 6
Tax cuts will happen because republicans are in power and that’s what republicans do. However, it’s probably not going to involve the expenditure of much political capital. More likely (if Trump has any sense at all), he’ll make the country club republicans expend capital with him to get those cuts. I imagine that deal has already been made. I’m sure the legislation is already teed up and ready to go.
Citizen of a Silly Country #439210 January 14, 2025 10:38 am 15
Exactly. Trump needs to tell the GOP, give me immigration restrictions and securing the border, then I’ll support tax cuts. Not the other way around.
Dutchboy #439234 January 14, 2025 11:48 am 10
Sounds good but somehow those restrictions and the border stuff never seems to happen. It’s always the Charlie Brown/football thing.
Ostei Kozelskii #439230 January 14, 2025 11:37 am 12
But to hell with Greenland. I don’t want more outposts for the Blackberry Fruitcake Empire, I want the BFE to shrivel upon itself.
Citizen of a Silly Country #439250 January 14, 2025 12:10 pm 7
I don’t care about Greenland, but getting it would ensure that he’ll be remember 100 years from now.
Horace #439309 January 14, 2025 3:04 pm 7
I agree with this. If Greenland’s resources have to leave Greenland, they should go to a European (white) civilization, not the Shlomo-owned 3rd-world shithole that America has become.
Alzaebo #439363 January 14, 2025 8:32 pm 0
Like…Denmark, maybe?
Steve #439275 January 14, 2025 1:00 pm 7
The real problem with tax cuts is they almost never impact the base very much. They tend to be tarted up with giveaways to rich people who are overpaying their local political games, and refundable credits to encourage welfare people to pop out more kids. And while corporate cuts on paper would be good for Americans, supply/demand won’t readjust with all the current barriers to entry. You need new, entrepreneurial producers, which the admin state will not allow. And the existing corps like Disney will keep working around the rules with their foreign workers programs.
Tars Tarkas #439294 January 14, 2025 2:03 pm 4
America had a much better economy under “draconian” tax rates. I’m not saying those high tax rates caused the better economy, but it falsifies the idea that taxes cripple the economy.A lot of money was spent on plant and equipment in that era because it was all tax deductible. Nobody actually paid the high rates. We were the most economically powerful country in the world. In many categories we produced more than 50% of the world’s production. We were also the largest creditor nation ever (we’re now the biggest debtor ever) earning vast income streams from that credit extended to foreigners.There were other reasons, especially in the post war era, but the idea that taxes burden an economy and makes you less productive is poppycock, at least in comparison to neoliberalism. All the people who drone on about giving more tax cuts to the rich completely ignore just how damaging the MIC/Empire is to the US economy. They entirely ignore the horrific cost of maintaining the bureaucratic state and all the laws in employment which make employing somebody so risky. They ignore that it takes 10 years to build a new factory in most locales in America or 10 years to open a mine.Of course, they will never name a tax rate. It’s always just “lower!” If the taxes were 1/2 the rate they are now, they’d still be claiming the taxes are too high and they need to be lowered.
Steve #439320 January 14, 2025 3:51 pm 3
I’m not saying lower is always better. Obviously, the “capital gains” crap came along to deal with changes to tax law. While it used to be a good investment strategy was to buy blue chips and cash (or reinvest) the dividends, tax policy gave us the ephemeral and usually imaginary valuations that pumped up stock options. But the other thing to keep in mind is that when taxes go up, that money goes to the guys who are keeping the wars going and importing our replacements. That’s not a winning strategy for our side.
Jeffrey Zoar #439338 January 14, 2025 6:39 pm 4
Taxation and economic policy was entirely incidental to the historically unique position the GAE found itself in post WW2. Would have been prosperous regardless of policy. Will never be repeated. But at least a couple of generations of Americans look back on it as the way things ought to be, as if it can be reproduced. Which it can’t.
Alzaebo #439364 January 14, 2025 8:36 pm 0
Reducing the high rate era gave the gameplayers a ton more dosh to waste on political games.
Mycale #439196 January 14, 2025 9:56 am 14
With regards to Israel, anything Trump tries to not do will be met with instant resistance, not just from Dems, not just from the media, not just from his own party (ahem), but from his cabinet as well. We all know the tail wags the dog here. We just saw how Congress shamefully jumped into action to shame the ICC for calling a war criminal a war criminal. Nothing has changed on that front. He can’t just punt on this.He also, obviously, cannot focus on fairy tales from the media (Russiagate, piss tape), sob stories (kids in cages, Muslim people stranded at airport), and tax cuts. The fact that he went to social media last night to whine about the ineffectual loser Jack Smith and his fake, vindicative, irrelevant report tells me that he is still far too concerned about what the Establishment thinks and says about him. Of course, he’s Trump. He is 78. He’s not going to change.
Barnard #439193 January 14, 2025 9:48 am 11
Is it correct that Trump can do nothing on Ukraine for 100 days? I would see that as ideal, but the Clown Prince of Kiev is going to be asking for another handout before then. A large percentage of Congressional Republicans are going to want to give him another blank check. Hopefully this has already been worked out with the leadership and they have been told they have to put him off for now. Would he veto an aid bill after a neocon created media crisis? Let’s hope so.
thezman #439201 January 14, 2025 10:16 am 31
The American bankers and military contractors got paid last year, so the pressure for new money will be far less now. Unless Trump asks Congress for Ukraine money, Johnson will not do anything. Biden sent billions in the last month, so that works in Trump’s favor, oddly enough. He can just point to that money when Zelensky demands more money.My sense is Kellogg made the rounds and learned that Ukraine is in deep trouble and there is nothing that can be done to change it. He also seems to have learned that Zelensky will never do a deal with Russia and Russia is not interested in talking to him anyway. The neocons created an situation that cannot be resolved at the bargaining table. They did this on purpose, on the assumption that it would force NATO to enter the war. That turned out to be a false assumption.The only good option for Trump is to blame Biden and the Europeans for creating this mess and simply refuse to participate in it further.
Citizen of a Silly Country #439206 January 14, 2025 10:26 am 15
Yeah, I saw the 100 days as a way to simply let the situation unfold. The Russians are obviously in the final stage of grinding down the Ukranian military. Waiting 100 days allows the outcome to be even more clear. The Trump team offers to negotiate. The Ukrainians refuse. Trump says, “Well, I tried, but the Ukrainians won’t come to the table. Europe, you handle this.”
Dutchboy #439240 January 14, 2025 11:55 am 9
If Trump tells the Ukes and Euros the jig is up and the money/weapons supply is done, they can take it from there and get the best deal from Russia they can (it won’t be much). It is the US money and weapons that are keeping this fiasco going.
DLS #439255 January 14, 2025 12:15 pm 12
This is very similar to the Russian invasion of Afghanistan. Not a single American citizen would have cared if it was not in the “news” everyday. It’s simply not our problem, and only effects the politicians who are laundering money through Ukraine.
Jack Dobson #439209 January 14, 2025 10:36 am 21
Reports are emerging that the Ukrainians are selling Western weapons on the open market, including to the Latin American narcotics cartels. I suspect this has been the case from the start, but the significance of the stories becoming more prominent is to lay the groundwork for cutting off funds. Propaganda has to be understood and appreciated in our Soviet-style system, and as a guide for what is planned. Watch in the days ahead for more reports of distinctly European weapon systems recovered from firefights on the southern border.
christian Schulzke #439252 January 14, 2025 12:12 pm 7
The Defense contractors got paid, but Blackrock and Archer Daniels Midland haven’t. What happens to their investment if Trump lets it all wither on the vine? Surely they will put pressure on Republicans to do something.
Son #439296 January 14, 2025 2:13 pm 6
Who’s feeling bamboozled yet? Upvote for yes you are; downvote for no. Baitin’ n’ switchin’ for MAGA! Remember friends, I said they’d possibly deport a token 500k immigrants and people would fall for it… and lo’ and behold, they’re saying MAYBE 1 milly violent criminals only! Hurray! We def need a state of emergency to [checks notes] enforce the existing laws around crime and immigration! Don’t worry, you’ll get another round of the ever-expanding police surveillance state this term though.
Lavrov #439204 January 14, 2025 10:24 am 5
No matter how much he wishes to avoid, the events will draw him to the international front. If missives start flying over us bases in ME thanks to netanyahoo, he will have to either have to start shooting or bring them home. In Ukraine, he will be shocked to find how many us soldiers are directly involved in the war and will need to make a decision to shut down operation and that will make the front collapse. Then there is this Houthi business of shutting down all ocean trade, “china-china-china” aligned with “Russia-Russia-Russia”, and whichever other pot Biden is leaving broken.
Lavrov #439205 January 14, 2025 10:25 am 3
Missiles, not missives
Ostei Kozelskii #439302 January 14, 2025 2:38 pm 3
Hugs, not drugs…
Alzaebo #439367 January 14, 2025 8:43 pm 1
Klaus: bugs and drugs = hugs
Zulu Juliet #439264 January 14, 2025 12:31 pm 10
“…start shooting or bring them home.” Bring them home. We have been shooting for the last thirty-five years. Let’s try something different. If we can let the Somalis get away with dragging Ranger corpses through Mogidishu, and let the Taliban humiliate us in Afghanistan, I don’t think removing troops from Syria and Ukraine will be any worse. It will probably be salubrious to remove the troops of our own volition rather than withdraw them things have become untenable [again].
Steve #439280 January 14, 2025 1:17 pm 3
Yep. And the smart play is to announce that we are leaving, and that our missiles and bombers are leaving last. Don’t F with us, and you can do what you want with the country after we are gone. Otherwise, you thought Gaza was a mess…
c matt #439350 January 14, 2025 7:42 pm 0
Why in humiliation? Assad is gone – simply declare mission accomplished and go home.
Alzaebo #439351 January 14, 2025 7:45 pm 4
Reading Sundance’s analysis of Trump’s Cabinet picks at Conservative Treehouse, I’m going to disagree with all the naysayers declaring this iteration as another marionette show. I think Trump is gearing up to do exactly as the Zman predicts: he’ll merely make noise towards the neocon agenda while attempting a major shakeup of our ossified domestic DC bureaus.
DYSPEPSIA GENERATION Blog Archive A Do Nothing President #439191 January 14, 2025 9:41 am 2
[…] ZMan peers behind the curtain. […]
Tarl Cabot #439253 January 14, 2025 12:13 pm 1
Trump’s instincts are to stay out of foreign entanglements, but he has made commitments. His natsec appointments are generally very hawkish, and it remains to be seen how resolute he will be in the face of the “provocations” which are certain to come. Trump dislikes both Netanyahu and Zelenskyy on a personal level, but that doesn’t necessarily mean he disagrees on policy. Again, we shall see.
The Wild Geese Howard #439236 January 14, 2025 11:52 am 1
Ukraine has been designed as a forever war. That bunch of neocon lunatics will simply wait Trump out. I think there is a significant chance Trump can be duped into an Iran war by the usual suspects. I suspect we will see a big push for this from Bibi. He probably figures his time is getting short since he is nearly as old as Trump and he does have his own legal issues at home.
Alzaebo #439368 January 14, 2025 8:45 pm 1
that minus was an upvote
pyrrhus #439212 January 14, 2025 10:47 am 1
Question Z-man…why are some of my comments suddenly being moderated?
thezman #439219 January 14, 2025 10:58 am 7
This has always been an issue. The spam tool is a bit over zealous at times.
Yagama #439381 January 14, 2025 11:38 pm 0
Its Feel like so dumb and stupid So you don’t want to be to rule by German, but it’s okay to be ruled by alien merchant who destroying you and rape your daughters?It’s so stupid to give your society to psychotic Jew and brown mutants who eventually ruin everything all of those white girls who married those mutants make really ugly offspringIt’s like somebody wrecks beautiful art and replacing with some hideous Hindu murder god painting in real time


Back to top