A Radical Departure

An interesting subtext to the election of Donald Trump is one that has been largely ignored by the usual sources. It was not cultural issues, foreign policy or the ineptitude of Kamala Harris that drove the election. It was the economy. Widespread anxiety over the economy is what drove down support for Harris, despite the billion-dollar campaign and the billions spent in media gaslighting. No amount of jawboning could convince the public that the economy is doing as good as claimed.

There is a good reason for this. As some have predicted, inflation has been creeping back up after having moved down for a period. The American economy is experiencing what happened in the 1970’s. Contrary to popular belief, inflation did not rage for the entire decade but ran in spurts. There were periods where inflation rose, plateaued and then fell to a tolerable level. The latest data on the CPI and the PPI indicate the current economy is stuck in a similar pattern.

Regime media dismisses this as a minor blip in an otherwise glorious economy, managed by the wise and noble Biden administration, but that has not convinced anyone who buys things. The government does not measure inflation the same way it used to measure it in the 1970’s, so no talk of stagflation. If they used the old methods, inflation would be a daily feature. Of course, you also have the fact that the government now lies about all of the economic data.

This is why the gaslighting failed so miserably in the election. One of the secrets to trick people is to overcome the expectations gap. This is the difference between what people expect to be the basis of the argument and the actual basis of the argument. If you confirm what people think is true and make your argument from that basis, you can convince people of most anything. If you start from an alternative reality as your basis, then you have little chance, no matter how clever the argument.

That does not alter the fact that the economy may be in worse shape than the government and media are willing to admit. There are systemic problems that go back a long way that may finally being coming to the fore. Twenty years ago, everyone talked about what would happen to the labor force when the baby boomers started to retire, but no one talks about it now that they are retiring. Of course, no one dares talk about is replacing those baby boomers in the workplace.

For his part, Trump talks about the need to reform the economic model away from everyone doing each other’s laundry back to building things again. Part of his approach to China is to bring back important parts of the industrial base. Trump is committed to a form of Abenomics which means massive new spending to attract private capital, along with policies to coerce those investments. He will come to office just as government spending is setting new records.

This sort of worked in Japan because they have a strong industrial base that supports their export economy. They also have a homogenous culture with a commitment to self-sufficiency and a savings rate to prove it. For America, this can only work with low interest rates and that can only happen if the dollar returns to its dominant position in global trade and investment. It is why Trump is threatening to nuke any country thinking about going off the dollar.

The trouble is, people will trade in a currency if it is backed by something accepted everywhere like gold or the issuing country produces things that the rest of the world covets, like food, manufactured goods and energy. Alternatively, as has been the case for decades, countries will transact in a currency if it is viewed as a stable store of value by the rest of the world. The dollar has been the reserve currency because of the petrodollar and because it came with a stable set of rules.

Constant rule breaking by Washington has depressed the trust in the dollar because the rules behind it have collapsed. The only reason that the BRICS countries are working on an alternative payment system is they fear dependence on the dollar makes their governments unstable. Added to this is the fact that the Saudis have not renewed the petrodollar agreement signed in the 1970’s. This has not resulted in a change in policy, but China just sold dollar-denominated bonds in Riyadh.

This is one reason the foreign policy establishment is committed to creating chaos in the Middle East. The United States is not just the world’s banker. It is also the world’s protection racket and the countries that need protection the most are those near places with lots of instability. You can be sure that the collapse of Syria is keeping the sheiks in Riyadh tossing and turning at night. Here you see the connection between foreign policy and economic policy. In the end, it is always about money.

This is what Trump will inherit next month. On the one hand, the economic model of the American empire relies on the world being a dangerous place. This is what makes the world willing to put up with Washington in exchange for protection. At the same time, that model is slowly hollowing out the American middle-class. The imperial model works just fine if American citizens accept being mere subjects alongside the rest of the world’s population. Clearly they do not like this.

To some degree you can understand why permanent Washington has reacted to Trump and the populist movement that has made him possible with such fear. They understand the risks that come with putting the American people first. It is not just the cultural stuff or the paranoid fear of the past. It is the understanding that the imperial economic system cannot prioritize Americans over the others getting protection. Protection rackets must protect everyone inside the racket.

Whether or not Trump understands this is a mystery, but he is committed to an American form of Abenomics. It was not an accident that he hosted Abe’s widow last week at Mar-a-Lago. Scott Bessent, Trump’s pick to run Treasury, is known as “The Man Who Broke the Bank of Japan” because his hedge fund made billions from Abenomics by understanding it in great detail. Whether it can work in America is unknown, but we will know soon enough.

That is the irony of the Trump election. He was elected in large part to fix the economy, by which people mean lower inflation and increase wages. Republicans have done this with tax cuts and corporate giveaways and Democrats have done it with spending programs and corporate giveaways. The Trump plan is to restructure the economy, which will require massive spending and a considerable amount of pain. It is a radical departure from what people have come to expect.


If you like my work and wish to donate, you can buy me a beer. You can sign up for a SubscribeStar or a Substack subscription and get some extra content. You can donate via PayPal. My crypto addresses are here for those who prefer that option. You can send gold bars through the postal service to: Z Media LLC P.O. Box 1047 Berkeley Springs, WV 25411-3047. Thank you for your support!


**Promotions: **Good Svffer is an online retailer partnering with several prolific content creators on the Dissident Right, both designing and producing a variety of merchandise including shirts, posters, and books. If you are looking for a way to let the world know you are one of us without letting the world know you are one one is us, then you should but a shirt with the Lagos Trading Company logo.

Minter & Richter Designs makes high-quality, hand-made by one guy in Boston, titanium wedding rings for men and women and they are now offering readers a fifteen percent discount on purchases if you use this link. If you are headed to Boston, they are also offering my readers 20% off their 5-star rated Airbnb.  Just email them directly to book at sa@******************ns.com.


To keep Z Man's voice alive for future generations, we’ve archived his writings from the original site at thezman.com. We’ve edited out ancillary links, advertisements, and donation requests to focus on his written content.

Comments (Historical)

The comments below were originally posted to thezman.com.

176 Comments

RealityRules #436211 December 17, 2024 9:12 am 53
The disfiguration of America is striking. In the 80s it was the suburb, the suburban strip mall, the shopping mall/galleria, and the mega church. Now that is decaying and you have a mass human disfigurement. It is absolutely striking to see TGR and its disfigurement of the population itself. In some areas you can drive vast distances and not see a single American – a person who looks like you. It makes Starbucks, Little Caesar’s and Taco Bell happy. Disfigurement. That is the legacy of the Regime on The Potomac.
george 1 #436217 December 17, 2024 9:57 am 6
Well said!!
Jeffrey Zoar #436311 December 17, 2024 2:44 pm 28
Even the white folks are largely disfigured now, obese and covered in tattoos.
Krustykurmudgeon #436343 December 17, 2024 4:34 pm -2
The suburb/strip mall/indoor mall thing was itself a gay op and now they can’t even do that anymore. It’s like our system trades one gay op for another
Compsci #436220 December 17, 2024 10:05 am 48
“Of course, no one dares talk about is replacing those baby boomers in the workplace.”Come now. We all know those thieving Boomers will be rightfully replaced by those Millennials and Zoomers whom they wrongfully displaced through dint/luck of birth cohort. Right?Wrong. The Boomers were overwhelmingly White and the powers that be have decided to replace them with a non-White demographic—a demographic woefully not up to such a monumental task as extending a 1st world technological society such as they were given.The Boomers will all be dead and gone in 20 years. Gen X’ers will mask the decline, some early Millenials will cushion the collapse, but in the end it will be for nought. 50 years from now, historians will understand and note our self induced destruction.
The Wild Geese Howard #436231 December 17, 2024 10:39 am 25
Compsci-Good points, I just slightly disagree with your timeline.I feel as though we are already seeing significant declines in the workforce due to Boomers and early Xers retiring or being forced out of the workforce via ageism.I think this will accelerate as all the Boomers cycle out of the workforce because X is a numerically smaller generation and the relative quality of our education was less than that of the Boomers and other prior generation.I write this as a very late Xer. I’d like to be able to argue that my generation will somehow turn things around and create a new Golden Age in the West, but I look around and I just don’t see it.
Alzaebo #436262 December 17, 2024 11:51 am 16
What concerns me is that as the Silents and Boomers (and Millenials) pass, so goes the deep talent pool of knowing how to do things from scratch. There’ll be nobody left to teach the next generations how to bootstrap or even do anything.
Nick Notes Mugshot #436326 December 17, 2024 3:39 pm 16
We have YouTube as a great repository of human knowledge until some future 28 year old MBA at Google decides that maintaining 50 year old video files that no one watches is too expensive and has them deleted.
Compsci #436313 December 17, 2024 2:50 pm 3
Howard, can’t argue with you there. My weakness is being an overly optimistic sort wrt my dire predictions. 😉 The declining education system was a good catch. In these matters of prognostication there are any number of confounding factors. Your observation, educational decline, might be ameliorated by AI as such unfolds in the current decade. Who knows?
Scipio #436268 December 17, 2024 12:05 pm 24
It’s interesting that the Harvard Bus School MBA program currently runs a teaching case study on the decline of Boeing – with a grand reveal that Boomer accountants and top management *a quarter century ago* are directly responsible for the lethal decline of a once gold standard aviation company.Nothing is dare said in class (and the teaching notes make no mention of it) about the loss and marginalization of pale, stale and male Boomer engineers and their replacement by vibrant DEI quota “talent”.Thus one of the *real* teaching and learning take-aways is a strong validation of Z-Man’s Expectations Gap concept.
Compsci #436314 December 17, 2024 2:58 pm 22
Yep. Recently speaking to an old friend I went to school with (50 years ago and just reunited) who is familiar with Boeing’s quality control decline. Oddly, he could not lay his finger on the cause of the problem until I pointed out demographic changes and DIE initiatives out to him. He has not stopped talking about such since. It was a revelation. This guy is bright, yet blinded because no one he interacts with dared be the first to “cross that line”.
Dutchboy #436269 December 17, 2024 12:09 pm 31
I happened to go in a Verizon office yesterday for a phone problem. The staff were young people, mostly non-white, heavily pierced and tattooed,a few of the men effeminate-looking and all dressed in very unbusinesslike, casual, almost scruffy clothing (their equivalents are everywhere). We Boomers are leaving the country to a generation of pitiable Sad Sacks.
3g4me #436292 December 17, 2024 1:15 pm 26
“We Boomers” largely welcomed in our progeny’s replacements with open arms in the name of luv and equality. “We Boomers” are considerably less likely than Millennials to gift any of “our” money to our own children during our lifetimes. Too busy spending it and ‘living our best lives’ to think about future generations. “We Boomers” are a prime example of short-time preferences. The fact that Boomers tend to be White and better educated is a legacy from earlier generations – one we squandered. Those “pitiable Sad Sacks” are the result of “We Boomers” preoccupation with ourselves.
Compsci #436318 December 17, 2024 3:20 pm 17
No argument here, but a bit of a clarification/addition—for what it’s worth.This “Boomer” married another Boomer who also has three degrees. We Boomers put our children into private schools as soon as the public ones revealed their true nature. We Boomers put our children through university while 1) approving the major and university, and 2) requiring that both children work while going to school in order to pay their share, which actually was about the total cost if one considers the scholarships they received.The result. Two offspring who graduated with honors, no debt, and walked immediately into 6 figure jobs—both marrying similar spouses. In short, the children laugh when we chide them about cutting them out of our will or leaving them nothing. Now the bad part…We failed them, but they don’t know it yet. With luck, we’ll be dead before they know such. How? We gave them things—material things—and thought we did well to do so. But we had one thing given us that I now realize was something they did not receive, and what was the most valuable thing that could be given…a spiritual upbringing in a faith community.Materialism distracted wife and I from the one thing all parents, rich or poor, can give. That I’m sure will be my final regret when my time comes to an end here.
Alzaebo #436355 December 17, 2024 7:51 pm 2
No, Compsci, we must break from those hidden chains and forge anew. They are too easily swayed, buoyed by the illusion of belonging to a past that never was. You have done them a service; I suspect that your decency was intrinsic, not learned from an artifice. That is the true heritage you have given them. The purpose of the system is the System. Christianity was such a vessel, but having been turned, is become social gospel and messianic projection. It could not keep up with the modernized environment.
Spingerah #436334 December 17, 2024 4:07 pm 10
For some boomers that may be true, it’s definitely the stereotype.Not all.of us are selfish bastards that retire to a vineyard despite what you see on TV. I plan to work.till noon on the day I die. Just not for the man.
3g4me #436339 December 17, 2024 4:25 pm 14
Of course it’s a generalization – I’m just tired of the ‘Not all boomers” standard reply, plus the generalization about younger generations that disregards how they ended up the way they did. My kids have not been all that successful by most metrics, and I have plenty of frustrations with them – but they both remain believing Christians and they are both race realists. And they know we love them and have their backs – perhaps too much so.
Sub #436350 December 17, 2024 5:50 pm 10
Exactly 3g4me. This “hooray for boomers” circlejerk going on in this thread is a little nauseating. It certainly wasn’t the face tattooed 20somethings that sold the country’s patrimony to China in order to buy themselves a 40 foot RV to cruise in with their 3rd spouse. As someone just barely old enough to know what they missed out on, I say that today’s youth deserve pity far more than scorn, they don’t even know what they could have had.Vox day is a huge clown, but he isn’t wrong about the boomers and their infinite self-regard. For some reason that generation thinks being handed the keys to history’s wealthiest empire and leaving their grandchildren a smoking crater is something to celebrate.
Steve #436364 December 18, 2024 12:02 am -5
What is nauseating is this total cluelessness. As a group, Boomers had less to do with selling out to China than you do with the border jumpers. Boomers had no right to tell people what they could and could not do with their own stuff. While we were not happy with it, legally and morally, it was not our call. Gen Z is a larger cohort than Boomer. Millennials are only a bit smaller. Why can’t they stop the migrants? This is legally and morally their call.
Spingerah #436380 December 18, 2024 9:34 am 2
Todays youth. I never wanted to be the old bastard complaining about the lazy young people.I think most of todays problems stem from the old saw. Hard times make hard men etc..The good times have lasted for a long while. Now it’s looking like the sky really is falling.I home daddy trump finds a way through that isn’t war.
ray #436214 December 17, 2024 9:42 am 48
‘The American economy is experiencing what happened in the 1970’s.’But America is a vastly different country today than in the Seventies. I drove around the western U.S. before I left the nation, for an evaluation. I saw an utterly transformed country. Shops boarded up everywhere, litter all over the avenues, crazies wandering around.Tent-cities everywhere . . . streets full of men cast away in the 50-year pogrom to replace them en masse in education and employment with The Empowered Ones. Replacing an 80 million-strong productive workforce with an unproductive and entitled workforce has consequences. That isn’t about retiring the old U.S. economy and plugging in ‘Abenomics’. It’s a collectivist (and demonic) social mandate that guarantees the destruction of the nation.Yet that policy is wildly popular with the international elites, women, and the parents of daughters. That is a guaranteed demographic time-bomb that is ignored at peril, yet is embraced not only by Progs, but also by ‘conservatives’ and Christians. It is a wildly popular suicide.Likewise, the Biden Administration made it clear all along that their aim — actually, the NWO elite aim — WAS to gut the economy and the nation as a whole in order to ‘Build Back Better’. Because racism and sexism and homophobia. They wished to utterly destroy the nation so that a more egalitarian, globalist system could replace it. It’s difficult to make an economy function when the stated aim of the government and its bankster handlers is to ensure it DOESN’T function.‘The Trump plan is to restructure the economy, which will require massive spending and a considerable amount of pain.’Might help short-term, but doesn’t solve the problem, because finagling the numbers and systems does not address the real issues in New Amerika. It’s just more scamming and showtime.
Dutchboy #436264 December 17, 2024 11:57 am 14
I live near San Diego, CA, which likes to bill itself as “America’s finest city.” The decline of the city has been striking, with many of the signs of decline you cited. Not coincidentally, what used to be a Republican stronghold is now dominated by Democrats. They hold three of the four congressional seats in the county, all of the seats on the San Diego city council (and the mayor is a homosexual to boot) and a majority on the County Board of Supervisors. That board recently voted to make the county a sanctuary county. Fortunately, the county sheriff said she has no intention of implementing any sanctuary policies in her department and will continue to cooperate with immigration authorities.
ray #436319 December 17, 2024 3:25 pm 16
My brother was born in San Diego. Fifty years ago it was a gem of a city. I’m sorry, but not surprised, to receive your updated report. ‘the county sheriff said she’ No. Just no. A very hard no. And the same for the feminist ‘conservatives’ that infest the GOP.
Carrie #436377 December 18, 2024 8:56 am 1
Hahahahaha.I too had my brain “fart” for a second, when I read that the sheriff was a “she.”Hmmmph.Women need to be keeping the home, and having babies. And the men need to be repealing the 19th Amendment.But of course all of that is a pipe dream.We are right to ask the Big Question: “How on earth did we get here?”I honestly think it’s a collection of factors: NWO, brown horde invasion, Boomer lack of understanding (not entirely their fault, I must admit), Satan’s successful activity, decline of education (but I repeat myself)… and more.All we can do now is teach the younger generation(s) (Alpha and whatever comes next ) how to DO STUFF. And BUILD THINGS. Maybe some of our knowledge (and as a Gen X’er I have very little of that knowledge, myself!) can be passed on.It is the Whites who will live amongst the rubble, at the end of the 21st Century, whom I predict will wake up and ask “WTF is all this mess?”, get super-race-aware, and establish a new White Renaissance. And I will look down and smile.
pyrrhus #436204 December 17, 2024 8:28 am 32
The problem with Trump’s plan is that no one trusts the US anymore (and that includes the mercurial Trump)….and with US debt soon crossing the 40 trillion level and escalating rapidly, owning dollars that you can’t spend right away is beginning to look like a bad bet…
Arshad Ali #436206 December 17, 2024 8:46 am 20
Quite right. No-one trusts the dollar to be a stable repository of purchasing power. Probably not a single person here does. Holding dollars or dollar-denominated paper such as T-bills is to watch your purchasing power erode away like a sand castle to an incoming tide. But the empire needs others to want to accept dollars in exchange for hard goods. And this can perhaps only be done (and that too only in the short term) by an escalating level of violence. This is the crazy and desperate logic of a hollowed-out empire.
RealityRules #436225 December 17, 2024 10:15 am 12
This is very bad. I assume the vicious seller’s market in housing is related to dollars coming onshore. The GAE’s home territory is for sale to the highest bidder. Things are going to get way worse too.
Citizen of a Silly Country #436230 December 17, 2024 10:23 am 24
Sorry, but there’s no other choice than the dollar (and thus treasuries) – at least for now. Name me a currency that is better than the dollar. Name me a govt bond that is in the same universe in terms of liquidity as t-bills. I hate GAE, but the dollar isn’t going anywhere until an alternative reserve asset can be found. Heck, the biggest problem for the dollar is that it’s too strong.
The Wild Geese Howard #436236 December 17, 2024 10:52 am 17
Right?There are too many wealthy Chinese hoovering up real estate in the West to make anyone feel comfortable holding their wealth there.Then you have the Euro. No one is going to trust a currency backed by a federation where the government of Germany, the key power, just collapsed.On top of that, that key power is rapidly de-industrializing because it insists on trying to function using the most expensive and unreliable forms of energy. No one with any financial sense is buying into that.No one in the West will trust Russia and the ruble because there are too many bad memories of the Soviet times. All the sanctions and being locked out of SWIFT do not help either.Adjacent to that, intentional or not, the recent debacle in Syria just caused a huge hit to Russia and the momentum that BRICS had built in recent months.Like it or not, the fall of Assad has created a big perception problem for Putin and team. The ongoing quagmire in Ukraine isn’t helping either.
Citizen of a Silly Country #436239 December 17, 2024 11:04 am 15
It’s not just trust in the various other currencies/govts. There’s also the issue of a deep bond market.If investors, businesses, banks and central banks want to hold your currency to use later, they need someplace stable and liquid to hold that currency, something that they can sell in an instant with no loss to obtain that currency. That’s T-bills.China doesn’t even have a govt bond market for foreigners. Germany’s govt bond market is tiny – and the Euro is tied to other countries beyond Germany. Japan, are you kidding me. Russia’s not even in the discussion.Btw, it’s not just that other countries can’t challenge the US dollar; it’s that they don’t want to challenge the dollar. They know what having global reserve currency does to your economy. It de-industrializes it. They don’t want that.
LineInTheSand #436340 December 17, 2024 4:26 pm 5
“They know what having global reserve currency does to your economy. It de-industrializes it. They don’t want that.” I don’t recall you stating this point so starkly before. Is resigning from being the global reserve currency a necessary prerequisite for re-industrialization of the USA? If Trump decided to follow your economic advice, do you have any to give?
Ben the Layabout #436351 December 17, 2024 6:19 pm 1
U.S. labor (and for that matter, all “rich” nations’) is horribly expensive by world standards. This is probably the major factor that so many jobs “went overseas” in recent decades. Firms in the third world don’t need to obey silly environmental, pollution, workplace safety, etc. regulations either. That (and tariffs) is why an avocado that costs you $2.00 in San Diego can be had at a fraction of that price just south of the border. In the 1990s when I was in my early 30s studying Computer Science, when I was in a sarcastic mood I would “share with” the younger students “There are people in India and Pakistan with advanced CS degrees who speak fluent English, who work for about one-tenth the U.S. wage scale.” Needless to say I wasn’t very well received. Nevertheless, I think that statement was broadly true and probably even truer three decades later.Anyway, what factor(s) would make U.S. Labor, and therefore U.S. manufacturing more attractive overall? Simple: a vast decline in the real cost of a U.S. worker. That could be accomplished by a deflation, or similarly by massive inflation that reduced his real wage cost. If this realignment happens, it might well put the entire economy through the wringer probably on a scale of the Great Depression.
Steve #436365 December 18, 2024 12:17 am 1
“They know what having global reserve currency does to your economy. It de-industrializes it.” I’m pretty sure that’s not true. I know of no inherent characteristic of a reserve currency that inexorably leads to deindustrialization. It didn’t happen to any degree for at least the first 20 years of Bretton-Woods. On the other hand, it does decouple the immediate consequences from the action of profligate spending. People used to empiricism can be tempted with stupid ideas like “deficits don’t matter” or “invite the world”.
The Wild Geese Howard #436258 December 17, 2024 11:45 am 5
Incidents like this West-backed scooter bomb assassination of a top Russian general in the middle of Moscow are also awful for Russia’s perception: https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/head-russias-chemical-biological-defense-forces-assassinated-moscow I mean, if you can’t protect your top people what can you protect? Nothing like this happened in the KGB days.
Lakelander #436333 December 17, 2024 4:05 pm 5
Since GAE can’t win a real war, they’ll be satisfied winning the propaganda war. Perception seem to matter much more to them than to Russia.
Pozymandias #436354 December 17, 2024 6:41 pm 3
Terrorism is a good asymmetrical weapon for weak players to use against stronger ones. I’ve noticed that a lot of what “Ukraine”** does against Russia that makes headlines pretty much falls into the category of terrorism or comes damn close. Recall that group of drones they sent to attack some buildings in Moscow. They did some damage but nothing significant. The whole point seems to have been to get a propaganda victory. Then you’ve got their love of assassinations using bombs like when they killed Dugin’s daughter and now this latest hit on the official mentioned at ZH. You might even look at the assassination of Soleimani in Iran as the start of this trend.The US has certainly done assassinations before but I suspect this may be a major shift in the focus of its military strategies using “Ukraine” as the cats paw to test out this new scheme. If this is true it’s a clever way to pivot away from trying to intimidate the world with Wunderwaffen which the Ukraine war has shown to be less than “wunder”. Imagine if our trillion dollar MIC were to pivot more towards “personalized war” (facial recognition drones, smart bullets, designer viruses created for just one person or a small tribe).** I’m putting “Ukraine” in quotes because we all know that Ukraine has about as much sentience and agency as “Biden” does.
Kevin #436237 December 17, 2024 10:56 am 5
for us here in canuckistan the USD is rock solid.
Alzaebo #436243 December 17, 2024 11:19 am 8
I think this might identify the unspoken question about Bitcoin.The coin people and Trump backers (it seems) are are pumping Bitcoin and private ‘stablecoins’ as the big new thing. Whitney Webb warns that CBDC is unnecessary; the governments are shifting to managerial class privately generated stablecoin because it is already mature, established, and just as trackable and programmable (restrictable) as cbdc. Also, it has that unaccountable public-private vibe one finds in NGOs. As Citizen points out, there is no deep, liquid bond market for international settlement in Bitcoin. Banks, business, forex couldn’t operate as they do now.
Dutchboy #436266 December 17, 2024 12:02 pm 4
Currencies have always been backed by governments since the first coins were minted in the 8th century, B.C.. Because of this, I have been skeptical of Bitcoin-type currencies that bill themselves as free of government control.
Mr. House #436327 December 17, 2024 3:40 pm 3
Not totally true, you could take a Roman gold coin and spend it in China, no government needed. Perhaps you’re thinking of Fiat currencies?
Ben the Layabout #436352 December 17, 2024 6:26 pm 1
If those coins were made of gold, silver, and heck even copper, they still have value (ignoring sometimes astonishing numismatic premium) whether a government minted them last year, two centuries or two millennia ago. Their value was effectively set by the free market, not by government edict.
Arshad Ali #436245 December 17, 2024 11:24 am 13
“there’s no other choice than the dollar (and thus treasuries) – at least for now. Name me a currency that is better than the dollar. Name me a govt bond that is in the same universe in terms of liquidity as t-bills.”This is all correct but it’s not a choice between one crud fiat currency and some other crud fiat currency. It’s an issue of getting out of fiat altogether, whether dollar, euro, or yen. Hard assets — land, gold — and something hopefully impervious to state confiscation. I would assume (but don’t really know) that wanting to get out of national fiat currencies is part of the allure of crypto.A little thought experiment on my part as I muse aloud. Suppose I inherited ten billion in liquid US dollars. What would I do with it? Well, I wouldn’t keep it in cash or treasuries (beyond some minimum amount). I would make large purchases of land elsewhere in the world, hopefully far away from the greedy maw of the US empire and its satellites. I would buy large amounts of precious metals, again hopefully outside the orbit of the empire. I would renounce US citizenship as fast as possible so that the minions of the empire couldn’t hold me over a barrel. And it goes without saying I’d be out of the USA, and outside the “Western empire”. also as fast as possibleIf these options were closed to me, then what? I would play the game of capitalism the way Musk is. Because today the conjoining of capitalism and state power is closer than ever. It’s crony capitalism at the top and decay and stagnation elsewhere. These are my thoughts as I muse aloud.
Ivan #436253 December 17, 2024 11:36 am 6
“Hard assets — land, gold — and something hopefully impervious to state confiscation.” PM’s are the only hard asset with zero counter party risk, IF one possesses them outside the system. Land has counter party risk.
DLS #436287 December 17, 2024 12:37 pm 2
Arshad Ali, what would be your top 3 destinations?
Tom K #436247 December 17, 2024 11:30 am 6
I have to agree. In fact, I had lost sight of the economic picture with regards to Syria, but it is a perfect example of how the financial kingpins of this world periodically sow chaos from the Acela corridor. They have no other tool when things look dire for the existing international financial arrangements than to sow chaos in the rest of the world. That eventually starts a flight to the dollar in order to buy U.S. debt, the “dirtiest shirt in the hamper”. It has always worked before (but of course someday it won’t.)
Compsci #436320 December 17, 2024 3:29 pm 3
Syria, and many other troubled countries, will continue to economically function, albeit poorly, because their transactional exchanges will involve other currencies like the dollar and euro. This is how Zimbabwe’s populace survives. You know the dollar is dome when you find a country in economic distress and the populace reverts to exchange with rubles or yuan.
Alzaebo #436356 December 17, 2024 8:16 pm 0
Yes and yes. TomK and Compsci neatly summarize today’s Z-post with both its question and our quandry.
Vegetius #436209 December 17, 2024 9:04 am 16
No one trusts anyone anymore. Is there a relation between this reality and the noise about strategic bitcoin reserves coming out of Russia and Trump’s camp? I understand bitcoin in theory but not in practice. I also understand that a lot of our guys have been holding it for a long time.
Marko #436219 December 17, 2024 10:01 am 5
Many Boomer conservatives have a strong libertarian streak, and naturally Trump is intrigued by Bitcoin. I think he’s considering options and plan B’s rather than grasping the USD’s fading aura like an old pagan religion.
Compsci #436321 December 17, 2024 3:32 pm 2
There may be a bad side here if it involves digital currency to replace our fiat currency. No one controls Bitcoin in theory, but you can’t exchange it like the paper money in my wallet.
Steve #436366 December 18, 2024 12:27 am 1
And the biggest threat is far and away its reliance on internet. Even if you meshnet, at some point you need a gateway out of your local community. A social credit system is not impossible to implement in the States. Debanking and deplatforming is a real thing. So is the “kill switch” in your automobile, back to at least 2008 or so. Your ATM card stops working, your credit cards are denied at the grocery store. Your smart meter shuts off your electricity. It is insanely easy to make us do something stupid, one at a time.
Ivan #436254 December 17, 2024 11:38 am 7
“I understand bitcoin in theory but not in practice.” Like youtwit(x)facein, crypto is an intel fronted ponzi scheme.
Hemid #436276 December 17, 2024 12:16 pm 5
Collectible surveillance. The most dystopian currency imaginable. The teenage Randians among us don’t carewhat it is.They just enjoy the thought of other people being ripped off, losers and haters missing out, etc. They’ll give upeverythingfor that feeling. It’s been edifying, not only for those running the experiment (“intelligence,” roughly), but for us. Total nerd death.
ray #436325 December 17, 2024 3:36 pm 2
Bitcoin isn’t freedom from gubbermint intervention and surveillance. It is the summa of gubbermint intervention and surveillance, a highway-marker on the road to CBDC, which the globalists and banksters are gonna install one way or the other. Then nobody (except them) will have any freedom at all.
Krustykurmudgeon #436345 December 17, 2024 4:41 pm 5
Florida banned cbdcs so it’s not totally lost
ray #436215 December 17, 2024 9:55 am 26
Exactly. Once my adopted nation heard the Fed’s Build Back Better agenda (we have to destroy ourselves in order to create a More Just World) and saw America intentionally ruining itself via the Scamdemic, they jumped off the Dollar Train. Fast. I guess folks have forgotten the forced closure of hundreds-of-thousands of small businesses because, uh, Covidemic. Thus, the dollar began a years-long tanking here, because what sane nation would place any amount of trust in a country that has announced — overtly and covertly — that it wishes to die?
george 1 #436216 December 17, 2024 9:56 am 3
Never a truer word spoken.
Tars Tarkas #436246 December 17, 2024 11:29 am 9
The debt wouldn’t be that big of a deal if our GDP was real. Problem is, the GDP is bullshit. Nov 2024 was a 76.1 billion trade deficit. I doubt we have had a single positive balance of trade number in this century yet. The national debt has grown every single year since 1963.There are all these articles and videos from the usual suspects about how Americans are so uninformed because despite everyone complaining about the economy, the US economy according to GDP is doing great.What are you going to believe, your lying eyes and purse or the BLS?
Steve #436367 December 18, 2024 12:36 am 0
“GDP is bullshit.” Yep. And they know it. Its only purpose is to fool the rubes. What is the free market price of an M1A2 Abrams? An F-35? There ain’t one. Put down whatever number gives you the GDP you want.
usNthem #436207 December 17, 2024 8:46 am 24
Man, does this essay cut to the chase – what’s good for America (more like the American government and its corporate cronies) is what’s bad for actual Americans. I guess we’ve incrementally and partially voted our way into this s*** over the many decades, but won’t be voting our way out now. Something a lot worse will happen sooner or later…
Marko #436213 December 17, 2024 9:37 am 23
There was a video floating around X the other day where some woman with a wonderful Canadian lilt was giving Trudeau the business during a town hall for selling Canada out to the globalists. Trudeau – to his credit?? – seemed obsequious. Just a few years ago, he was yelling at the same types saying “Madame, vous êtes raciste!”Then of course a few weeks back Starmer in the UK basically apologized for immigration. I haven’t heard anything out of Australia yet, but those bloody c*nts had better get their act together, soon. It’s a shame about Australians, because they were the most ornery and irreverent English speakers I knew when I lived abroad.But nice seeing such a big vibe shift in the Anglosphere. Almost miraculous. There haven’t been this many white pills since 1924.
Hokkoda #436291 December 17, 2024 1:14 pm 14
I was in Calgary during Thanksgiving. On the news, CBC I think, couldn’t tell if it was local or not, they were panicked about Trump’s tariff “threats” and lamenting Turdeau’s roughly 12% approval rating. His finance minister, the woman who terrorized protesters awhile back, resig-fired in a bitchy letter to the PM. Turdeau is trying to prevent the collapse of his leftist government as happened in France and Germany. It’s time to pay the piper.
Tars Tarkas #436324 December 17, 2024 3:35 pm 8
The debt to the piper is far greater than a no-confidence vote. Truly paying the piper would be a far, far higher toll.
Hokkoda #436362 December 17, 2024 9:43 pm 3
It’s a start. But my favorite thing about the “government collapsed” problem is that an unelected caretaker bureaucrat force runs the country until elections are held. IOW, when these governments collapse NOTHING ACTUALLY HAPPENS! lol
Kerrang #436301 December 17, 2024 1:34 pm 17
Aussies are ornery on a personal level but can be quite servile when it comes to officaldom. Maybe something to do with being a penal colony: convicts rough with each other but following orders from the big boss. I remember the Covid concentration camps in Oz and how little opposition there was from the people.
Jack Dobson #436310 December 17, 2024 2:28 pm 20
Australia is much like Texas in that it coasts on a reputation that ceased to be reality long, long ago. Australia has been largely urbanized most of its existence. The Covid tyranny was not a one-off, either. For example, after the Port Arthur Massacre the police with very little resistance sometimes kicked down doors to seize firearms. That was ’96. Like Texas, Australia still has a few based areas but they are and have been for more than a century in the minority.
Tars Tarkas #436329 December 17, 2024 3:42 pm 7
The problem is the elite all over the US is (more or less) exactly the same.Sticking with Texas, there is some bow-tie wearing (((Judge))) with a youtube channel who in an interview said he became (((judge))) (Judge Fleischer) to eliminate cash bail in the county he is in, at least for misdemeanors. I believe it’s Houston. He is a typical clown.
Tars Tarkas #436244 December 17, 2024 11:19 am 21
Nibbling around the edges isn’t going to fix anything. The American economy is rotten to the core. As a result of the rot, it is simply too expensive to manufacture or mine in the US if foreign competition is a viable alternative. It’s why we import steel rather than making it ourselves despite the massive iron ore deposits we are blessed with.It is impossible to compete with foreign companies which operate in places without all the regulations the US has. Even if workers in the US were literal slaves, we could not compete with workers in places like China where all the laws are simply not enforced. This only worked in the past because of the high productivity of American workers at the time. We had the best production machinery in the world. Now they have the same high productivity machinery and are not burdened by endless regulations.
Steve #436368 December 18, 2024 12:49 am 0
This is the lesson that too few take from Mustache Man’s big mistake. He correctly realized that selling Germany’s vastly superior machine tools to untermenschen in exchange for cheap, low tech goods like food and fuel would eventually let them build their own factories. German autarky might have worked, but he quit trading tools for food way too early. German ag wasn’t close to sufficient, and it’s coal reserves weren’t suitable for autos. So he took on massive spending to get coal gasification going, and to jump-start ag.He would eventually come to realize that his autarky would only work if he played to German strengths, and annexed untermenschen in Grozny and Ukraine to do the grunt work.
TomA #436235 December 17, 2024 10:50 am 20
Go deeper. We have been too affluent for too long and most Americans are now fat and only suited for busy work in the service or parasite industries. The value of the dollar is essentially tied to the productivity of its people, and we’ve just imported tens of millions of illegals to mow lawns and pick strawberries. Trump cannot wave a magic wand and turn this deadweight into rocket scientists. Each of us has a duty to remake ourselves as solid, strong, wise, and valuable contributors to real productive accomplishment. Anything else is failure.
BigJimSportCamper #436305 December 17, 2024 1:45 pm 19
“solid, strong, wise, and valuable contributors” I was one of those in IT for many years until I got muscled out by a shitskin dot H1B. Trump LOVES him some H1Bs and said he’s staple green cards to foreign graduates of US universities. Some magic wand.
Compsci #436332 December 17, 2024 3:53 pm 5
Trump needs to tighten up the H1b VISA’s. To wit, a case must be made for “no American available” issue only and then for a limited duration. About a decade or so ago, there was a squawk in the IT industry when Disney obtained H1b VISA’s to *replace* their entire IT department. I remember distinctly because I had always assumed this was impossible and against the program “rules”. Disney offered something like 6 weeks severance iff their departing American IT folk stayed on to *train* their Indian replacements!
Steve #436370 December 18, 2024 12:58 am 2
“To wit, a case must be made for “no American available” issue only and then for a limited duration.” I’d go further than that — no way, no how. There are all kinds of qualified people holding lesser positions. Without the H1bs, you would just hire them out of the low- and entry-level positions, freeing up space for younger programmers to get experience. Rip the damn bandaid off. The wound is going septic.
Krustykurmudgeon #436348 December 17, 2024 4:48 pm 4
People (or at least I used to) conflate h1b with high skill when it’s often not. Hell, even if it was, there are still plenty of Americans who can do the work
Steve #436369 December 18, 2024 12:53 am 1
“…and we’ve just imported tens of millions of illegals to mow lawns and pick strawberries.” Don’t forget their primary purpose — to eat us out of house and home.
Jeffrey Zoar #436241 December 17, 2024 11:06 am 18
Since the plandemic, I’ve kind of given up making economic predictions, because who could have predicted that, which was primarily an economic event, first and foremost. Being so informed, that they are willing and able to do things beyond imagination to save/protect their system, introduces a little humility in forecasting. I note that they did that with Trump in office, which he is about to be again.
Jack Dobson #436242 December 17, 2024 11:13 am 3
Good point. The loss of normalcy makes forecasts shaky at best.
Mr. House #436304 December 17, 2024 1:39 pm 5
“I’ve kind of given up making economic predictions, because who could have predicted that, which was primarily an economic event, first and foremost.”If you had heard about the repo problems at the banks late summer 2019, you knew something was coming. I just didn’t expect the fraud of covid. Though when you consider how much of the economy is fraud, well you need an even bigger fraud to cover it up and give you excuses to print money and bailout your cronies. The covid numbers were fraud, so what do you think about economic numbers? And i’d argue they’ve been fraud since the late 90’s.
Tars Tarkas #436336 December 17, 2024 4:10 pm 4
The numbers have been fraud far longer than that. It was JFK who didn’t like unemployment. So he changed the way it gets recorded and magically we have lower unemployment. It was under Nixon that they first started really mucking around with inflation numbers, so magically, we’re whipping inflation now (WIN!).
Krustykurmudgeon #436347 December 17, 2024 4:47 pm 6
When you consider September 2019 was when the left, out of the blue, began an impeachment against trump, it really makes you wonder what the hell was going on. Like someone should foia all communications during that time. Then, when the impeachment was over, COVID happened almost like clockwork. Was the impeachment a time buying exercise?
Jack Boniface #436212 December 17, 2024 9:24 am 18
The problem with Abenomics is it didn’t have any effect on Japan’s low birthrate, currently 1.2 per woman and dropping. Not enough babies were born 25 years ago to provide the workers in 2025 to design and run an industrial economy, or any economy. Our birthrate is better, 1.7 and declining. It’s 1.6 for blacks, whites and Asians; 1.9 for Hispanics. No recent data for immigrant women, but it’s been 0.4-point higher than native women. No one has a solution to this. But birth rates did tick up with the Reagan prosperity, as more families could afford to keep Mom home with the kids, cooking.
thezman #436218 December 17, 2024 9:59 am 31
I am very skeptical about any link between economics and fertility. Programs to increase TFR with tax breaks and cash prizes have all failed. Even cultural pressure seems to be failing in Asia. Now, any cultural pressure that does not address the defect of sexual equality is doomed to fail.
Mr. House #436222 December 17, 2024 10:12 am 8
“I am very skeptical about any link between economics and fertility.”I’m not, its called a depression for a reason. Japan is essentially in the same boat as we are. They ran up a huge debt bubble, and then decided to put all the debts on the public ledger because letting capitalism do its thing would mean the people running the show wouldn’t be running the show anymore. That is all QE and 0% rates are about, making sure the people in charge stay in charge. Shoulda let it happen peacefully, we all know where this goes next. How you gonna have a family when a base house costs 400k and the media brain washes your wife to hate your sex?
Citizen of a Silly Country #436226 December 17, 2024 10:16 am 32
Birth rates have collapsed everywhere. Sure, the economy has some impact but not much. Urbanization hurts for sure. But the big reason is equality. As soon as women are allowed to get an education and allowed (either legally or culturally) into the workforce, birth rates plummet.
ray #436250 December 17, 2024 11:34 am 2
Yup and yup.
Tom K #436263 December 17, 2024 11:53 am 4
Citizen, your comments are always astute and always cut to the underlying reality. Don’t know what a stute is however *groan*
Marko #436273 December 17, 2024 12:13 pm 4
It’s gotta be widespread porn. Unless your people are rapey and sex-crazed (cough cough Africans/Middle Easterners/South Asians cough cough excuse me) AND your culture doesn’t have marriage arrangements porn is enough to keep people from the arduous task of seeking out mates.
Dutchboy #436274 December 17, 2024 12:13 pm 16
Contraception and abortion are the mothers of feminism. Women who have children to take care of are a different breed than childless singles (or childless marrieds).
Lakelander #436346 December 17, 2024 4:43 pm 6
Bingo! There is an outstanding graph of Japanese fertility rates during the 20th century. Unsurprisingly, the waterfall collapse begins when women were given equal rights after WWII when the US rewrote their constitution.
george 1 #436229 December 17, 2024 10:22 am 24
Watch for the white male hate to moderate some over the next few years. We will be driven to a massive war somewhere and the powers that be are going to need white males to fight it. The other demographics just won’t be up to it. I pray that the younger generations don’t fall for it like the previous ones did.
Dutchboy #436275 December 17, 2024 12:15 pm 11
Very few young white males now are soldier material. Obesity and brain damage are rampant among them.
BigJimSportCamper #436303 December 17, 2024 1:36 pm 11
Good for them. Beats bone spurs and flat feet.
ray #436249 December 17, 2024 11:33 am 13
‘How you gonna have a family when a base house costs 400k and the media brain washes your wife to hate your sex?’ Yup.
Templar #436267 December 17, 2024 12:02 pm 9
Dude, I’ve lived in Japan for 30 years, nobody talks about the national debt. Its not a topic most normal Japanese people talk about and never will be brought up. Nobody gives a shit about it. The economic hardship factor coming from that somehow suppressing birthrate doesn’t compute with observable reality. What does, however, seems constant is low birth rates in countries with a presence of a high standard of living, living a “soft” life where no discernible physical danger is present, and abundance material wealth. Economics is just an excuse not to have kids, not a valid reason.
Mr. House #436288 December 17, 2024 12:53 pm 5
“Japanese people talk about and never will be brought up. Nobody gives a shit about it” And do you think they’d talk about it if they weren’t a western client state? I bet they would. “Economics is just an excuse not to have kids, not a valid reason.” Unless they’re someone you don’t like right? If you don’t think an endless march up in the cost of living doesn’t have any outcome on this they i’m not sure how i can convince you.
Jack Dobson #436309 December 17, 2024 2:11 pm 6
The national debt in the United States isn’t as widely discussed as in the past, either. Was it even mentioned in its last election?
Mr. House #436315 December 17, 2024 3:17 pm 4
Nope, and since no on is talking about it, can’t be important 😉
Evil Sandmich #436322 December 17, 2024 3:34 pm 3
It’s like discussing craters on the moon: there’s absolutely nothing that can be done about it anyway.
Mr. House #436330 December 17, 2024 3:42 pm 2
disagree. You ignore it, the debt gets worse and the outcome gets worse with it.
Alzaebo #436360 December 17, 2024 8:42 pm 2
Huzzah to Templar for the contrarian view. Something doesn’t wash with the ‘educated women’ schtick; I’d say it’s more a conformity with school year scheduling. In other words, we outlawed puberty so we could match Rockefeller school schedules. Marriage after all is license to procreate. Let’s bring the young ones back into the system at an earlier age: work, marry, trade skills (remember Home Economics?). And adjust society to young people having kids, instead of scheduling kids to “society”. Earlier participation is what we need.An “old maid” was 18 in Mom’s day.
ray #436363 December 17, 2024 9:45 pm 0
Seconded.
Steve W #436516 December 18, 2024 3:53 pm 2
TFR doesn’t tell the whole story. There is also the phenomenon of women waiting into their thirties to have kids. This, I would argue, is a consequence of economics.Let’s say women had their 2.1 kids at or by 21. If this pattern holds then women would be grandmothers at 42, great grandmothers at 63, and great-great grandmothers at 84. However, if women hold off on their 2.1 kids until 35, then they are grandmothers at 70, and unlikely to ever be great grandparents, let alone great-great ones.See the problem? The TFR is still 2.1, but a whole generation is missing…
Citizen of a Silly Country #436227 December 17, 2024 10:19 am 20
Yep. I see all kinds of analysis for why birth rates have collapsed and many of the reasons (urbanization, high costs, etc.) mentioned, I’m sure, have some merit but, ultimately, are minor. The big issue is equality. No matter the country or economy, as soon as women are allowed to be educated and are allowed (either legally or culturally) to enter the workforce, birth rates plummet. But no one – and I mean no one – wants to admit that this is – by far – the biggest contributor to falling birth rates.
ray #436260 December 17, 2024 11:45 am 16
Women love their new-given supremacy over men, the international elite adore it for its griftiness and its neutralization of potentially restive men, and the parents of girls are all for it, because now my princess will never need no man. Who, exactly, does that leave to oppose it? Not enough is who, and these are carefully kept voiceless. Nor can the real problem — feminism and its bedmate egalite — even be brought up in national conversation; it is taboo. You hear The Great Donald opposing feminism, single-motherhood and ‘equality’? Not on your life, Jack. (channeling my inner Biden)
3g4me #436295 December 17, 2024 1:28 pm 14
ray – a large portion of the commenters here have daughters . . . whom they have sent to public schools, allowed on social media, helped apply to colleges, and who were raised by their own working mothers. Because they ‘need’ a career and a way to support themselves, and because it’s not an accepted idea to marry and procreate young, and because many of their male counterparts have been raised on the same lies and demand a college-educated working wife. There is sadly no way to fix this short of a return to economic and social reality – and that only via great economic and social hardship.
Mr. House #436316 December 17, 2024 3:18 pm 1
My favorite thing, and i’m not sure when this became a thing, are people who aren’t married or have families buying a home……. for themselves. Talk about a coffin of consumerism
3g4me #436341 December 17, 2024 4:31 pm 5
Just like all the women who can’t boil water yet demand a designer kitchen. Or a few of the ‘off grid” or “homestead” youtube channels, where the White couples (and the moronic female commenters) are all about dogs and goats but don’t plan to have children.
ray #436335 December 17, 2024 4:08 pm 3
‘a large portion of the commenters here have daughters’Oh yeah I figgered.Want your daughters to go to the front of every social, legal and cultural line? Well that means enraging God and forfeiting your nation. Abenomics ain’t gonna save ya.‘There is sadly no way to fix this short of a return to economic and social reality – and that only via great economic and social hardship.’You are likely correct, but I’m trying to show how to fix it without that. It CAN be fixed without collapse and great suffering, but it’s NOT free. Their princesses cannot drive the national car anymore, for starters. (h/t, ‘Badge’ from Cream)However as I said elsewhere, the demographic tsunami of women, government, financial elites and the parents of daughters preclude the changes necessary. So they will pay the heavy cost, and so will their daughters.Me? I’ll be back with Papa by then. I don’t say this stuff to advance myself. It’s my responsibility and if I don’t do it, then I’m the one in (eternal) trouble.
Zfan #436376 December 18, 2024 8:48 am 1
I am in that dock. Thanks for the firm, accurate assessment– I am navigating through those waters now.
Alzaebo #436270 December 17, 2024 12:10 pm 9
The unnoticed part of the Information Revolution was that women went from factory assembly lines (“Liberation”) to fill the burgeoning need for data entry. The system needed sterile drones, and got them: the Hive.
Mr. House #436317 December 17, 2024 3:19 pm 12
I’m convinced most women only like the corporate life because its a continuation of high school. They love socializing, doesn’t matter how worthless or pointless, better then being at home raising your own kids not to be idiots i guess
3g4me #436342 December 17, 2024 4:34 pm 5
Compare how much time they actually spend on productive work versus time spent on office birthday parties and Christmas celebrations and scheduling vacations.
Steve #436371 December 18, 2024 1:14 am 1
I think the same is true for men. The jocks arrange for the company softball team, the student government types way too often end up schmoozing themselves into leadership, the nerds didn’t fit in, and still don’t. Everyone just keeps living the life he knows. But IME, most men don’t form the more vile of the high-school-esque cliques in theworkplacethat women do.
Bitter reactionary #436282 December 17, 2024 12:29 pm 16
CitizenOASC is correct on this. The Pill made demographic collapse inevitable for developed economies. Modern feelings of ennui accelerate it. Unrestricted female hypergamy turbocharges it. There’s credible data from multiple sources out there showing the bulk of young women are all chasing the same 15-20% of men – and they’d rather become cat enjoyers than settle for ‘normal’. And of course most people are fat and gross now, so not much natural attraction is even possible.I can’t recall the source, but it was pointed out that we have instincts for sex and for nurturing, but perhaps not for reproduction per se. Technology enables the comfort, convenience, freedom,and economic advantages ofchild-free life – naturally folks will take advantage.Our society is evil, so not feeding it more people seems pretty defensible to me. Let it die out. Perhaps white people will re-evolve 10k years after collapse…
Jimmy #436358 December 17, 2024 8:33 pm 4
The hypergamy thing is definitely real, as is the fat slob epidemic. Data on female mate choice shows a very skewed bell curve, especially on the dating apps, which are how maybe more than half of young people meet these days. Pareto principle definitely applies.For some young men dating is almost as easy as ordering a pizza, for others… a seemingly Sisyphean task. That said, I strongly believe that 20% could be expanded quite a bit if more young men would get off their butts and exercise just a bit. Really doesn’t take that much, 2-3 hours a week in the gym is definitely not an impossible task and it’s basically all you need if your diet is decent and you are consistent.The other problem is females are often really bad at making choices and their sexual drives are commonly self destructive (at least in our current small hat led cultural milieu). Go check out the romance novels they are reading, 95% of the titles are some variation of 50 shades of Grey. Bad boy who is mostly a POS but they can save him sort of thing. Very stupid, very self destructive. Might just be nature, idk, but I don’t think it was as bad as this before the 60s cultural dissolution of most traditional norms.Works out for me… I have a sort of resting murder face and was gifted with moderate attractiveness, but I really don’t have much to offer besides sex. It should not be this easy for me. I don’t even have to fill out my profile, we just match and I charm and tease them a bit and… fish in a barrel. Great for me personally but very bad for society. I am definitely not husband material at this time.Anyway, American culture is a small hat sewer and it’s been collectively poisoning us spiritually and psychologically for much longer than I have been alive. Very bad situation. As is the multicult. People need structure, traditions and stability. Probably impossible in a society as racially and culturally fractured as ours.Babylon was warned against for a reason.Reform.. I hope it’s possible. But it would take a long time and you would have to remove nearly all the bad actors from power and replace them with very wise and incorruptible paragons… Don’t see it happening… maybe it might.If Trump were to release the Epstein/Diddy files and clean house of the worst of the corrupt power base we might have a shot.Hope so. Won’t hold my breath, but hope so.Bit larpy of a thing to say, but honestly, often feel like Bernhard/Helmholtz in “Brave New World”. Worth a read if you haven’t read it. Our contemporary social environment is way too similar to what was predicted in a book written almost a century ago.Freaks me out sometimes. That someone was very close to accurate in predicting a sociological experience very similar to our modern situation so long ago.. 1931, when all there was, was radio. I wish I had that level of prescience.Huxley is a mixed bag though, tbh. A lot of his writings are terrible. Was definitely touched by the muses when he wrote BNW however. Lightning in a bottle. Classic work of speculative fiction. At least half of his predictions have since become manifest. We even have the mostly ignored war between the west and east conglomerated power blocs.Fahrenheit 451 too. Many parallels.
Mr. Generic #436255 December 17, 2024 11:40 am 15
Better economic conditions will have no effect on fertility as long as the women retain too much freedom. They are all crazy now. Give them more money and they will just spend it on more travel or an extra few cats.
Dutchboy #436271 December 17, 2024 12:11 pm 1
It has been reported that Israel has had some success encouraging births among their Jewish population.
3g4me #436300 December 17, 2024 1:33 pm 17
The last thing the world needs is more of them . . . from the country which produces almost all the worlds puberty blockers, international body organ brokers, etc. Not to mention the exceptionally high inbreeding and birth rates among their most ‘devout’ cohort who refuse to work or fight (that’s what goyim are for).
Steve #436372 December 18, 2024 1:17 am 0
Yes, but that’s largely among the orthodox. They have high birth rates everywhere they live. The population collapse is largely in the secular jews.
Hemid #436285 December 17, 2024 12:35 pm 7
“Economics” in the sense of monetary incentives is probably irrelevant. Theidea that children are unaffordablematters. Itworks. It’s not an economic idea. It’s a curse, a hypnotic spell that sways intelligent women and low-T men.Low birth rate is a sign of obedience. The spurious causes—educated women, true wagie buying power, etc.—are other signs of it. To restrain the birth rate in Africa, Bill Gates needs an army of needles. To make Swedes and Koreans extinct, it takes only a word.But also, not breeding may be a correct reaction to the world being made uninhabitable. It’s being made uninhabitable for Swedes and Koreans, not for Indians and Nigerians.
Hokkoda #436296 December 17, 2024 1:29 pm 10
Good data here:https://ourworldindata.org/fertility-rateThe crashing TFR is probably nature correcting for overpopulation.Example:https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2000/11/001128070536.htmHumans aren’t the only creatures on the planet that adapt their child bearing to the environment around them. Humans just add a layer of complexity but it’s a fairly normal biological process of adjusting the birth rate to suit the availability of resources.Thats why policy changes don’t work short of straight up paying women to stay home and have kids while simultaneously eliminating most of the rearing costs. Everybody’s got a price.A lot of women work because they can. But many more work because they must. It is almost impossible these days to support a family on one income because we’ve monetized every aspect of existence.Pay a woman $100K salary to have a minimum of 4 kids, raise them to adulthood, stay married, and never pay taxes again.And if we’re not willing to pay for it, how big of a problem is it, really?
Compsci #436328 December 17, 2024 3:41 pm 4
When you put a price on “birthing”, you then open the doors to cheaper ways to increase population, immigration. Of course, we have enough problems with such third world immigration.
Lakelander #436349 December 17, 2024 4:58 pm 5
If you look at an arithmetic chart of the world population throughout history, you can’t help but think this is the biggest bubble of all time. https://ourworldindata.org/population-growth-over-time
3g4me #436357 December 17, 2024 8:17 pm 5
My husband suggested a better idea – don’t pay the women, pay their HUSBANDS the extra $100k and they can again support a family on a single wage. Then the wives can stay home and raise their own children as they ought to. Out of all the people my husband and I knew socially and economically, I was the only stay-at-home mom. It cost us big economically, but we don’t regret it.
Arshad Ali #436205 December 17, 2024 8:36 am 18
“Whether it can work in America is unknown, but we will know soon enough.” It most probably can’t, and for reasons you carefully and patiently explain earlier in your essay. Trump will be trying to bail out a sinking imperial ship that has gaping holes in a dozen places with nothing save a cup in his hand. All empires are by definition extortion rackets and these rackets have lifespans that eventually expire. The same is now happening to the US empire, on which the sun is now setting.
george 1 #436223 December 17, 2024 10:12 am 15
The smart industrialists are not going to invest in America anymore IMHO. They have gamed out all of the scenarios and come to the conclusion that it just won’t pay off. For example billions of government supplied dollars spent to place a semi conductor factory in Arizona and the DIE policies are making it impossible to ever be competitive. The majority of the perspective companies bailed out.You do have some like Elon Musk but he is just a scammer. None of his Teslas would sell, save for massive government subsidies for EVs and tax breaks for owning one. Even then people are coming to understand just how impractical they are for most people.
Arshad Ali #436248 December 17, 2024 11:31 am 11
“You do have some like Elon Musk but he is just a scammer. None of his Teslas would sell, save for massive government subsidies for EVs and tax breaks for owning one. Even then people are coming to understand just how impractical they are for most people.”I just came back from another visit to Mexico. This year (2024) one car in three sold in Mexico is Chinese. You can buy a BYD (Chinese electric car) for between $21,000 and $23,000. This is probably why Musk needs US government protection (Trump is threatening a 100% tariff on imports from Mexico). Crony capitalism at its finest.
Compsci #436331 December 17, 2024 3:46 pm 4
BYD is—if I have read and viewed tests correctly—an example of a quality EV in every sense. Musk would do well to be afraid. Again, China can build crap and rob you blind if you are unwary, but that aspect of their competition will never hurt us. Higher quality will, and China does produce some good stuff.
Tars Tarkas #436338 December 17, 2024 4:22 pm 4
That’s not what I heard. I’m pretty sure it was BYD which just had a recall in Australia for electrocution hazard if you go to unplug it while still charging. There are a lot of reports out of China of BYDs crashing(on their own), airbags not going off, people trapped and unable to get out of burning BYD cars. People jokingly call them Burn Your Driveway.This may be just exaggeration for effect, but we’ve all been dealing with chineseum for over 2 decades and should have learned our lessons by now. Good luck trying to service anything out of China.
Tars Tarkas #436337 December 17, 2024 4:18 pm 4
These Chinese cars should never be approved for our highways. Take everything you know about pure Chinese (as in Chinese branded, not American branded made in China) consumer goods and now apply it to cars. I recommend you check out the Big Clive youtube channel. My favorite example is USB charge block that put 240v (UK spec) across the USB ground, the only part easy to touch. They just had a recall on BYD cars in Australia for electrocution risk. Not to mention the potential for spying.
Mr. Generic #436256 December 17, 2024 11:42 am 15
Of course, no one dares talk about is replacing those baby boomers in the workplace. Indians. They’re being replaced by Indians, and more and more people *are* starting to notice and talk about it.
Bitter reactionary #436286 December 17, 2024 12:37 pm 13
True, and its sickening. Better to burn everything down than hand it over to the poos. No measure is too extreme to fix that problem.
Mr. Generic #436308 December 17, 2024 1:51 pm 11
I’d rather burn down the poos and keep the everything.
Alzaebo #436361 December 17, 2024 8:58 pm 0
From the joos to the poos!That’s what I mean by Erectus Resurgent. (Hybrids, that is, tribal social instincts leavened by CroMagnon / Denisovian intelligence.)
Dutchboy #436261 December 17, 2024 11:49 am 14
The generally-accepted figure for those living paycheck to paycheck is 78% of wage earners. When inflation outpaces wage increases, these people feel it intensely and cannot be BSed out of that feeling. They have little in the way of savings so any monetary setback (e.g., a major car repair) goes on the credit card to be repaid at arm-and-leg interest rates.
Mycale #436233 December 17, 2024 10:42 am 12
They’re just going to start telling the truth of the economy once Trump gets into office, or something close it. Expect further massive downgrades to the 2024 job numbers, and start reporting GDP contraction to get a “Trump recession” declared in 2025, even though the media spent most of 2021 claiming that two quarters of GDP contraction isn’t AKSHULLY a recession.Trump is going to be fighting these dynamics and the City of London while trying to nudge the economy is a structural direction that is healthier for America. That takes time. Unfortunately his moves are long-term, while the City of London has the media, the Washington bureaucracy, many large banks, and the cosmopolitan elite on its side. It’s the same dynamic with immigration really.
Mary Poppins #436307 December 17, 2024 1:47 pm 2
I do love the idea that London,rather than Tel Aviv or New York, runs things. Moar tea, guv’nor?
3g4me #436344 December 17, 2024 4:38 pm 4
Much of the “City of London” is composed of Jewish financiers. They’ve intermarried with various levels of the native nobility and ‘captains’ of industry since the 1700s, but they remain well aware of their ancestry and cultivate their international ties.
Mycale #436353 December 17, 2024 6:35 pm 6
Not London, the City of London, of which New York and Tel Aviv are branch offices. There is an article on Unz which discusses it. Basically it represents global finance and opposes any sort of economic nationalism or the idea that the government’s job is to take care of the well-being of its people.
Citizen of a Silly Country #436221 December 17, 2024 10:06 am 11
Trump wants to use the threat of tariffs to bring manufacturing back to the US. That’s fine, but if he manages that, he’ll create problems for the dollar and inflation.Bringing manufacturing back will help blue collar workers but will also increase inflation. There’s a reason firm like to manufacture overseas. I’m fine with this, but will Americans be happy about higher prices? Probably not.Also, by reducing the trade deficit, you reduce the number of dollars leaving the US and thus floating around the global financial system. Given the relatively fixed need for dollars in the global financial system, you’ll increase the value of the dollar, which causes a host of problems.First, you cause inflation around the world. If businesses in Vietnam buy and sell goods in dollars, a rise in the dollar makes everything more expensive. Second, you increase the debt repayment costs of dollar-denominated debt (and there’s a lot of it) around the world. Both of these will hurt economic growth.Also, if the trade deficit shrinks, you could have lower demand for US treasury debt, which would push up interest rates. That’s not good.All roads lead to inflation. Trump will cut taxes and, despite what Bessent says, keep the deficit high, which means dollars getting pumped into the system which is inflationary. Bringing manufacturing home means inflation.The dollar needs to fall for a variety of reasons and that means inflation.
Compsci #436232 December 17, 2024 10:40 am 26
Yep, all negative consequences in the immediate future. That’s the pain talked about here and everywhere there are knowledgeable people in the conversation. The real discussion should be to the effect of what brings the greatest good in the long run. For me, it’s that my neighbor has a job and a hope for a better future for his children. That his/our/my standard of living declines, so be it.Our standard of living is built on debt. It was phony to begin with. It can never be made real. When I was a young boy, we had everything we needed. I desired nothing material, yet we possessed nothing in excess. Now I have such abundance that more causes problems in simply possessing such, and yet a growing proportion of my community cannot meet the simple costs of food, clothing, shelter.Such is the disparity of wealth in this country. Enough already. We as a species were not designed to live in such abundance, it makes us weak and crazy.
Citizen of a Silly Country #436234 December 17, 2024 10:47 am 18
The current system – dollar as the global reserve currency and globalization (shipping manufacturing overseas and importing workers to the US) – has been good for the three Ws: Washington, Wall Street and Walmart. It’s been a disaster for working-class whites.So, yeah, let that system burn to the ground. But you’re going to get higher costs of good and services and thank God for that. The upper middle class and rich people will have to pay more to get their lawn mowed and their kids watched. Too bad. And, yes, even working-class people will pay a bit more for food and clothing, but, overall, we’d live in a far better country.
Dutchboy #436278 December 17, 2024 12:18 pm 11
The costs would be spread over society, the benefits would be concentrated in the working class. Sounds good to me.
DLS #436289 December 17, 2024 12:53 pm 9
Very well said. Reminds me of this quote from Fight Club: “Advertising has us chasing cars and clothes, working jobs we hate so we can buy shit we don’t need.” I would add that the more shit we buy, the less likely we are to reproduce, which cycles us further down the happiness scale.
Jimmy #436359 December 17, 2024 8:36 pm 2
Best things in life are free. Friends, family, wife/husband, children. Problem for us now is that basic food and shelter are becoming unaffordable for many. If I wanted to buy a house in my old neighborhood it would cost me a cool million…. My folks bought theirs for less than 10% of that. 30 years years ago… wtf.
Steve #436373 December 18, 2024 1:30 am 0
The population now is around half again what it was when your parents bought. People moved further away to get lower prices. You can still do that. Just that your old neighborhood is no longer the place with the lower prices. You have to travel further, because of the more than 100 million more people in the States. It doesn’t help that policy choices and personal preferences have driven those prices through the roof.
Jack Dobson #436238 December 17, 2024 10:57 am 5
Yes. The incoming Trump Administration seemingly has baked into the cake continued inflation and increased interest rates. It will engage in deficit reduction kabuki and blame the cost cutting’s inevitable failure for the higher prices and the higher cost of borrowing. Will that work politically? Don’t discount it in a country with a high rate of innumeracy and economic illiteracy. If the rubes can be fooled into transferring the blame and the nation can reindustrialize, the country theoretically could thrive a long time. Also helpful is a media, including the financial press, that has discredited itself and will be ignored even if it reports accurately. The other problems, which are more severe in every imaginable way (think demographics, feminism and the resultant atomization, among other factors), makes a sustained renaissance a very unlikely result in the long term.
Citizen of a Silly Country #436251 December 17, 2024 11:34 am 4
Agree, except the govt can’t afford positive real (above inflation) interest rates. They will deficit spend and one way or the other, keep treasury interest rates below the true inflation rate.If GDP is real growth + inflation, positive real interest rates are a budget killer. Assume 3% inflation and 2% real GDP growth, so 5% nominal. If you have the real interest rate on govt debt at just 1%, you’d have a 4% rate. With debt to GDP at 125%, that’s 5% of GDP going to interest on the debt.The govt only takes in ~17% of GDP, so nearly a third.Entitlements = ~14.5% of GDPDefense = ~3.5%Total = 18% of GDPYou already have a deficit of 1% of GDP from just those two. Discretionary spending is ~3.5%, so now, the deficit is up to 4.5% – which is very close to nominal GDP. And that’s structural.So, here’s the equation:Nominal GDP growth = (Entitlements + Defense + Discretionary) – Govt Tax ReceiptsWhat did we leave out of the equation? That’s right, interest on the debt expense. Therefore, we have a new equation:Annual Growth in Debt to GDP = Interest CostsAgain, if you have 4% interest rates on 125% of Debt to GDP, you get 5% of GDP for interest costs, which means that debt to GDP grows by five percentage points a year. Thus, in four years of Trump, debt to GDP would increase from 125% to 145% (a tad more really). And that’s assuming no recession.That won’t work. Govt borrowing would crowd out too much other borrowing. The bond market can’t handle that amount of new debt without being forced to buy it. The whole global financial system would come unhinged.Nope, we have to have negative real interest rates. That means either Fed buys some of the debt or it forces banks, mutual funds, hedge funds and others to buy it. Regardless, that means dollars flowing into the system via deficit spending and that means inflation.
Jack Dobson #436280 December 17, 2024 12:26 pm 2
I didn’t know there would be math! I actually follow you but don’t see how negative interest rates could be imposed long term unless there were more political control of the Fed than there currently is. From memory, Europe’s experiment with negative interest rates ended after quite a bit of central bank grumbling. Also, hasn’t there already been some movement toward requiring financial institutions buying Federal debt? I know that’s at least been put on the table. If interest rates reflected reality even now, what would they be? It certainly would exceed those of the Seventies.
Jack Dobson #436284 December 17, 2024 12:34 pm 1
eta: I fact-checked myself and it seems Europe is considering a return to negative interest rates.
Citizen of a Silly Country #436293 December 17, 2024 1:22 pm 2
The Fed doesn’t necessarily have to buy the debt. They or Treasury Debt could just change the rules on banks, hedge funds and the mutual fund industry to require holding more treasury bonds.The Fed could also open a lending window to bank where the bank could borrow at a rate slightly below the interest on treasuries if they use the money to buy treasuries. Or the Fed could just guarantee treasuries so the banks could buy without fear.It’s not my world but even I know of five or ten things the govt could do outside of directly buying the debt. But you still end up with inflation.As to what real rates would be without interference, hard to say, but probably ~1% on T-bills and ~2% on 5-10 year bonds. Historically, the 10-yr earned nominally about the nominal GDP growth.
Citizen of a Silly Country #436294 December 17, 2024 1:24 pm 2
Btw, they could also just lie about the rate of inflation. If the govt says inflation is 3% but it’s really 6%, then nominal GDP growth will be ~8%. If treasuries are earning 1% above the govt-stated inflation rate of 3%, the rate would be 4%, well below actual inflation.
Jack Dobson #436298 December 17, 2024 1:33 pm 2
The way core inflation is calculated now is a lie. Stripping out food and energy is said to be “helpful,” but that’s a double entendre.
Mow Noname #436323 December 17, 2024 3:34 pm 1
Glad I bought them new-fangled “TIPS” 20 years ago and totally protected my investments from inflation. “Totally protected”. Poor, dumb, Moe…
Jack Dobson #436302 December 17, 2024 1:35 pm 3
Yes. To be clear, there has been movement by the Fed to require financial institutions to buy Tbills. I don’t know where that stands now.
DLS #436290 December 17, 2024 1:07 pm 2
Agreed. More simply stated, the only way to keep from bankruptcy is to reduce real debt with inflation. The only other option is spending cuts to everything, including the military and entitlements, but those are impossible politically until you are already in bankruptcy.
Citizen of a Silly Country #436306 December 17, 2024 1:46 pm 3
Correct. It sounds crazy, but the best option is to inflate away the debt. The alternative is a depression where the debt is wiped away via bankruptcy. People hear this and think Weimar Germany, but it doesn’t have to be so drastic. However, the problem with this plan is that voters hate inflation.
Steve #436374 December 18, 2024 1:42 am 1
For good reason. The average voter would be vastly better off with a deflating currency. “Sticky” wages have long been studied, and though there’s no rational explanation for it, it’s still a thing. Joe Q. Public would be vastly better off with “sticky” wages and falling prices. Inflation as a relief valve does not work the same. See the Cantillon Effect for details.
Alzaebo #436265 December 17, 2024 12:00 pm 4
Well, I don’t know. When The Male Starts To Hate…after all, sex might be women’s provenance, but violence is ours. I’d say that makes a renaissance unlikely in theshortterm, which means a true renaissance in the long term…if only we can find our balls again.Mayor LaGuardia didn’t call out the pipefitters’ union to fix the plumbing.
Jack Dobson #436281 December 17, 2024 12:28 pm 2
To be clear, I think a renaissance of any type is at best unlikely and most likely impossible.
Dutchboy #436277 December 17, 2024 12:17 pm 5
I like Paul Craig Roberts’ idea for a corporate tax based on the percentage of domestic production. The more you produce here, the lower the rate. It’s a better idea than tariffs.
Steve #436375 December 18, 2024 1:46 am 1
Interesting idea, but just as effective as the VAT in vertically-integrated businesses. The only ones who could not exploit the system are the smaller firms and non-MNCs.
Zulu Juliet #436257 December 17, 2024 11:42 am 8
When the baby-boomer retire, Gen-X will bail water for a while, then Gen Z and asylum seekers will stand around while the economy sinks. They don’t know how to turn a wrench, much less run a five axis mill or program a PLC.
Captain Willard #436224 December 17, 2024 10:14 am 8
“The Trump plan is to restructure the economy, which will require massive spending and a considerable amount of pain.” This hits the spot!A fair measure of system resilience is its ability to withstand pain in order to improve efficiency. Few countries have such systems. Even China is struggling with this. Ironically, Russia stands out here because they are willing to accept a lot of pain to avoid Western domination. Argentina is taking some pain but perhaps they had run out of choices. I’m skeptical the US oligarchy will be able to endure pain. Beating up on the working class was one thing, but firing bureaucrats and cutting the MIC is another.
Tars Tarkas #436252 December 17, 2024 11:35 am 3
I just watched a video about Argentina by some economist on youtube. He says there are a bunch of payments due in 2025 that they don’t have the foreign reserves to make. IIRC, he said the central bank had a huge net negative of foreign reserves, albeit slightly less negative than the day Milei took office. According to him, they have a ton of Dollar or other foreign currency denominated debt. There had been a 5 year grace period on that debt that ends this year.
ron west #436589 December 19, 2024 11:27 am 0
What can’t be paid wont be paid.
Krustykurmudgeon #436228 December 17, 2024 10:22 am 6
I remember reading somewhere – I think it might have been in Caldwell’s book – that the unspoken rule used to be that democrats were able to have control over the culture while republicans were able to make money. At what point did that agreement get broken – maybe Obama?
Mycale #436240 December 17, 2024 11:06 am 6
Those dynamics started to change under Clinton. Obama probably cemented it though, especially as he sat back while big tech took over our society.
Jeffrey Zoar #436272 December 17, 2024 12:12 pm 6
As somebody here (Alzaebo?) pointed out the other day, it happened because the corporations were taken over by the indoctrinated products of the pozzed academy, which just happened to coincide with Clinton being in office. The revolution began in the academy.
Krustykurmudgeon #436297 December 17, 2024 1:30 pm 5
My mom made me see that movie where Dennis Quaid played Reagan and it was irritating. While it is true that the Berlin Wall fell not long after he left office, I feel that people like him misdiagnosed communism. It’s like when someone is cured of cancer and it comes back a few years later and kills them. Whatever system we have in america now is basically a more implicit form of communism.I also think Reagan may have had an outdated view of the soviet union. It obviously wasn’t heaven on earth in 1981 but all the things Reagan thought about the USSR was really from the 20s and 30s. When people think about the Soviet Union, that’s what they are really thinking of.
Dutchboy #436279 December 17, 2024 12:21 pm 3
Clinton re-oriented the Dems towards the economic oligarchs (he was a member of The Democratic Leadership Council, which Jesse Jackson mocked as The Democratic Leisure Class Council).
Filthie #436283 December 17, 2024 12:32 pm 4
150 years ago, you eeeeeeevil capitalist American pig dogs sailed your fiendish gun boats across the Sea of Japan, parked them in Tokyo Bay… and then went ashore and declared that Japan was now open for business. Samurai warriors armed with swords looked down their noses at you and wondered what in hell was wrong with you people. Horses crapped in the street, and shrines to exotic gods were everywhere.80 years later… The Japs sailed their aircraft carriers across the Pacific, and Japanese planes bombed the shit out of Pearl Harbour. The Americans coughed in the fire and smoke and wondered what in hell was wrong with those people.40 years after you defeated them in the Pacific… they beat you up and ate your lunch! The best optics are made in Japan. The best cars and motorcycles and steel and glass are made in Japan. Time flies.Over In the sandbox: in the 1990s the ragheads were mostly backward foreign weirdos that annoyed (((our greatest allies))) and occasionally us ourselves. 30 years have passed. A couple months back, some muds calling themselves “Hooties” – put the run on a US Naval aircraft carrier group and ran them out of the Red Sea. Iran struck at heavily defended Israeli targets with hypersonic missiles… and destroyed them. It’s debatable whether or not they’re refining weapons grade plutonium at the moment.30 years ago Reagan would get those monkeys to the negotiating table with a dirty look. Today Biden tries to beg Arabia for any spare gasoline because he kneecapped his domestic suppliers. The Saudis told him to FOAD. Biden shat his pants and demanded ice cream.The world has changed, Dissidents! Again! You’ve talked a great talk ever since I found you all 5 years ago or so. I hope I live long enough to see what you actually do…😂👍
Dinodoxy #436210 December 17, 2024 9:11 am 4
Restructuring the US economy will cause moderately high inflation, at least for the short term. So invest accordingly.
Chazz #436299 December 17, 2024 1:33 pm 1
US trade sanctions are building BRICS
Lakelander #436312 December 17, 2024 2:46 pm 0
‘The Trump plan is to restructure the economy, which will require massive spending and a considerable amount of pain’ As necessary as a restructuring is, the considerable amount of pain is precisely why I believe this won’t happen. I don’t think Trump’s ego would be unable to accept this.
DYSPEPSIA GENERATION Blog Archive A Radical Departure #436203 December 17, 2024 8:24 am 0
[…] ZMan cuts to the chase. […]


Back to top