Blood Sucker Economy

Last week brought news that the iconic restaurant chain Red Lobster has filed for bankruptcy protection and has started closing locations. The chain is mostly known for being a cheap night out for people in the suburbs and businessmen stuck near a suburban business park. The people hired to write about business for regime media, people who know nothing about business, have rolled with the usual lines about how casual dining was devastated by the pandemic.

The joke online is that Red Lobster’s all you can eat shrimp deal cost them millions because diversity would sit there for hours eating shrimp. The restaurant admits it was a disaster for them, but the real reason the chain has failed is that it was taken over by gangsters who made it into a bust-out. The gangsters in this case are private equity investors who bought up the chain. This bankruptcy is part of fleecing the dumb money that still remains trapped in the enterprise.

The way these scams work is the private investors swoop in and buy a property that is asset rich but cash poor. That is, they have things of value, but those things are not generating enough revenue to meet expenses. Sometimes the enterprise is profitable but needs cash to expand or maybe reorganize itself to shed poorly performing assets and expand into more profitable areas. Private equity comes in with attractive terms and an army of experts to reshape the enterprise.

In reality, they usually sell the assets in deals that have the buyer lease back the asset to the company in order to raise quick cash. Other times the asset is pledged as collateral in a similar sort of debt arrangement. The result is the enterprise quickly raises cash to pay the investors with a healthy profit but is left stripped of its assets and often holding a lot of debt. This is what happened here. The new investors sold the real estate in lease-back deals that are now expiring.

It is a good example of how so much of our economic output is just moving money around in circles. It is the old joke about a stranger coming into a little town to rent a room for the night. Nothing of value has been created by investors buying up this restaurant chain. It simply became a vehicle for them to lure in new money to pay them a profit for their investment, while all along knowing that the end result would be these new investors getting a haircut in bankruptcy proceedings.

The argument in favor of this sort of dealing is that all of the parties involved are sophisticated enough to know the risks. The real estate investors that bought the properties and then leased them back knew the risks or at least they should have known the risks, as it is their business to know the risks. This is all true, but it obscures the fact that this is not genuine economic activity. This is not how an economy should function, but it is the core of the American economy now.

This is not without consequences. Travelers now have to check out the type of plane they could be boarding, because Boeing planes are falling apart. As with Red Lobster, the blame is placed on diversity, which is not entirely without merit, but the real culprit is the vulture capitalism that has come to define elite economics. Boeing is no longer in the business of building better airplanes. It is in the business of creating financial transactions for the benefit of the investor class.

What we see with Boeing has been happening with the military industrial complex for the last three decades. They are no longer in the business of building practical weapons that can be used by the American military. Instead, they are in the business of creating complex transactions for the benefit of insiders and investors. One result is an F-35 fleet that looks great parked at an air field, but it is too dangerous to fly. Meanwhile, Russia and China make weapons for war, not investor profit.

A root of this growing problem in the American economy is the notion that anything that can be shown to turn a profit is normatively good. The usual suspects are going to ruin the town of Harpers Ferry with a development project that will make them money, but come at the expense of the residents. They can do this because they went to the state and showed it will turn a profit, so everyone fell in line. No doubt promises of insider access to those profits were included in the pitch.

The reason profit is a good thing in an economy is it is supposed to spur innovation that results in new products and greater efficiency. Profit is a means to an end, not an end in itself from a macroeconomic perspective. When profit or the quest for profit results in planes falling from the sky or communities being harvested for their social capital, then profit or the quest for profit is bad for society. It is why we used to hunt down and punish corruption and fraud. Note we no longer do that.

An economy is about making things, fixing things, and inventing things, which is no longer the way to get rich in America. Instead, as Peter Theil explained in his book, the path to wealth is finding a way to game the system. You find a flim-flam like the Red Lobster scam or you game government to let you make electric cars that no one needs or wants. The blood sucker economy is not about making things, fixing things, and inventing things. It is about robbing the people who do those things.


If you like my work and wish to donate, you can buy me a beer. You can sign up for a SubscribeStar or a Substack subscription and get some extra content. You can donate via PayPal. My crypto addresses are here for those who prefer that option. You can send gold bars through the postal service to: Z Media LLC P.O. Box 1047 Berkeley Springs, WV 25411-3047. Thank you for your support!


**Promotions: **Good Svffer is an online retailer partnering with several prolific content creators on the Dissident Right, both designing and producing a variety of merchandise including shirts, posters, and books. If you are looking for a way to let the world know you are one of us without letting the world know you are one one is us, then you should but a shirt with the Lagos Trading Company logo.

Havamal Soap Works is the maker of natural, handmade soap and bath products. If you are looking to reduce the volume of man-made chemicals in your life, all-natural personal products are a good start.

Minter & Richter Designs makes high-quality, hand-made by one guy in Boston, titanium wedding rings for men and women and they are now offering readers a fifteen percent discount on purchases if you use this link. If you are headed to Boston, they are also offering my readers 20% off their 5-star rated Airbnb.  Just email them directly to book at sa@******************ns.com.


To keep Z Man's voice alive for future generations, we’ve archived his writings from the original site at thezman.com. We’ve edited out ancillary links, advertisements, and donation requests to focus on his written content.

Comments (Historical)

The comments below were originally posted to thezman.com.

294 Comments

Jack Dobson #405731 May 21, 2024 8:18 am 65
I have no ethical, religious, moral or sentimental attachment to capitalism. Yet I have to acknowledge it is usually the most successful economic system because it is realistic about people’s weaknesses and strengths. Then something like the Harpers Ferry story appears and reminds me that capitalism is woefully inadequate to deal with the weaknesses and strengths at times.The Harpers Ferry carve-out also reveals something painfully true about so-called “Red States.” The Republicans who run them are greedy and venal and more than willing to usurp local autonomy and transfer it to the state when money is involved. It doesn’t really matter if the state is poor like West Virginia or wealthy like Texas. In fact, there is some chance, albeit a minute one, this would not have happened in a Blue State. The most galling aspect is the GOP mouths slogans about federalism and will push it aside immediately when the stakes get high enough. Democrats hate the concept of federalism and while they might usurp local control to build migrants camps, child tranny surgery centers or whatever, they will do so as an exercise of raw power and not bother with a rationale.Mass migration, in fact, is very similar to what happened with Red Lobster and Harpers Ferry. The desire for cheap labor and new voters, two sides of the same coin, overrode the social concerns of citizens. The newer form, of course, is about the Great Replacement, but greed still underpins it.To contort the words of a man loved by vulture capitalists most of the time, you can have either financialization or socially compatible capitalism. Choose one.
btp #405740 May 21, 2024 8:42 am 48
Nobody feels like they have any skin in the game, as they say. In this case, the game is the welfare of the people, and a nation run by foreigners, unmarried hags, sodomites, Jews, and the hyper-violent underclass cannot possibly give a damn about the nation. It is the reason why other models of social organization are almost aways to be preferred, though the American mind rebels against conceiving anything like an alternative. Sad, but many such cases.
Jack Dobson #405748 May 21, 2024 8:48 am 39
Those Red State politicians I referenced almost all are straight white males and they have no less compunction about screwing over their own people than the alien elites/zoo freaks. It ultimately is the system is fatally flawed, in part due to how it predictably evolved.
btp #405752 May 21, 2024 8:54 am 14
When you are in a bust-out phase, there is no option except to behave as if you are in a bust-out phase. You see where I’m going with this, I trust.
Jack Dobson #405757 May 21, 2024 8:56 am 14
It was true even before the looting accelerated.
Steve #405766 May 21, 2024 9:22 am 7
A perfectly valid option is, was, and ever shall be local, local, local. If you base your business on solid principles and avoid debt, it’s pretty hard for the banksters to exploit you. You still face the problem cited here, where government refuses to protect citizens’ property rights. Don’t know what you can do about that except maybe don’t let those “investors” get their foot in the door in the first place.
Jannie #405803 May 21, 2024 10:18 am 32
Boycott, boycott, boycott, too. E.g. look for Mom & Pop restaurants when on the road and avoid the corporate slop-monsters.
Jack Dobson #405807 May 21, 2024 10:22 am 12
Absolutely. They took a hit, often fatal, during Covid but those diners are on the rise as fast food is on the way down now. People will eat actual food whenever the herd can’t stampede to some McVomit place.
TempoNick #405854 May 21, 2024 11:53 am 10
The price has gotten too high. Somebody posted a picture of a receipt from five guys. Two burgers, one large fry and two drinks almost 40 bucks.
pyrrhus #405917 May 21, 2024 2:47 pm 9
The Big Mac meal is now $18, and headed upward…
steve w #405947 May 21, 2024 4:21 pm 7
I admit to liking the sausage macmuffin with egg, and MacD’s coffee. When on the road I’ll buy their 2 for $5 deal on the sandwiches, pay $1.39 for their medium coffee (vs 3.49 at Dunkin’), saving the second macmuffin for a late morning snack or even lunch. I am not trying to defend MacDonalds per se or deny that inflation in meals isn’t real. Just reporting the facts as I experience them.As for a real sit-down breakfast at our favorite local family restaurant, my wife and I now pay $40 for what I consider to be a $20-25 breakfast (omelets, homefries, some bacon and toast, coffee, etc.) Plus the gratuity is now “understood” to be 20% rather than the traditional 15%.
Hi-ya #406053 May 22, 2024 10:11 am 1
When I was in high school in the mid /late 80s the father of a girl in my class owned a bunch of McDonald. Her house was in the newer boars head club rather than the old money Farmington. She had Ms Pac-Man like Ricky Schroeder but there was this bowl of coupons for Big Macs. We would grab a handful on our way out . Machiavelli says that men don’t know if their times are really better or worse that olden times. He hoped that he was not misjudging when he claims that his times worse than Ancient Rome.but those were sweet Big Macs!
Ostei Kozelskii #405839 May 21, 2024 11:27 am 24
The iron rule of economic life in AINO is, “the bigger, the worse.” What I mean by that is that the larger the business/corporation, the more evil it is.The reason this is true is that once a small business becomes successful enough to get on Wall Street’s radar, the Manhattan vampires show up and money-whip generally wholesome and decent owners into selling. Once that happens, the business in question becomes a part of AINO’s power structure with all the depravity, deceitfulness and criminality that entails.This being the case, when you have an option to do business with companies of different size, go with the smaller one, even it costs you a bit more. Try to withhold every farthing you can from the bloody maw of corporate AINO.
TempoNick #405856 May 21, 2024 11:57 am 8
It’s pretty funny how often their model fails. We had a beloved grocery chain here called Big Bear. It was a regular supermarket, but more along the lines of target. They were known for having the best meat, they even have their own cattle farm.East coast banksters bought it and sold off everything that made Big Bear successful and jacked up prices to East Coast levels. (East Coast pricing does not work in the Midwest.) I forget how many years they were able to string it along, but eventually they had to shut the chain down.But I’m sure they got their money out in management fees or whatever else they’re able to pull out of this companies. Same people also destroyed Grand Union, another grocery chain.In fairness, I didn’t seem like Big Bear was very profitable. They were profitable, but it didn’t seem like they were breaking any records.
Pozymandias #405939 May 21, 2024 4:07 pm 9
I don’t think that’s very surprising. If you pay your workers well, sell high quality goods at reasonable prices, and avoid ripping off vendors you’re probably NEVER going to be the most profitable. The recipe for a hyper-profitable business is simple – outsource labor and materials costs to the worst turd-world shithole you can find, slow pay or no-pay the vendors, and jack the prices up like they’re a monster truck.
Steve #405956 May 21, 2024 4:38 pm -5
I’m guessing you do not run your own business? I mean, how hard can it be to not hire employees, buy shit off Ali Baba and Fiverr, and bill the customer at 1000% markup? I’d buy your book if that worked…
Bourbon #405878 May 21, 2024 1:23 pm 5
Ostei Kozelskii: “The iron rule of economic life in AINO is, “the bigger, the worse.” What I mean by that is that the larger the business/corporation, the more evil it is. The reason this is true is that once a small business becomes successful enough to get on Wall Street’s radar, the Manhattan vampires show up and money-whip generally wholesome and decent owners into selling. Once that happens, the business in question becomes a part of AINO’s power structure with all the depravity, deceitfulness and criminality that entails.”As a counterexample to your thesis, yesterday Business Insider had a fascinating article about the Mars fambly, and their candy empire:https://www.businessinsider.com/mars-chairman-stephen-badger-reveals-details-about-company-future-2018-5Here’s an article on America’s Largest Private Companies by revenue:https://www.statista.com/chart/23592/largest-private-companies-us/Lots of them are in the German midwest:Cargill, MinnesotaKoch, KansasKohler, WisconsinUline, IllinoisApparently there is a great deal of controversy as to the ackshual numbers involved, but there seems to be a strong consensus that the Walton fambly probably still owns a majority of Walmart.
Tars Tarkas #405834 May 21, 2024 11:11 am 13
I’m not sure most can avoid debt. The fact is, most business ventures, including restaurants need a lot of money up front. You need a building, you need to renovate it, you need lots of equipment and you need to start paying staff right in the beginning. Something like Red Lobster needs even more money because their business is based on lots and lots of Red Lobster restaurants.
Steve #405843 May 21, 2024 11:37 am 5
Or one could try the method that’s worked throughout time — live on less than you earn until you can afford to go into business for yourself. Broken record, here, government is making that much more difficult than it need be, particularly with zoning and business licenses and whatnot, but if a first gen Thai couple can pull it off…
Arshad Ali #405886 May 21, 2024 1:45 pm 9
Absolutely. The economic and financial system is structured in a way that encourages vampires. A decomposing carcass attracts maggots. The system of centralized money and the associated system of credit creation lead inevitably to this soulless and nihilistic capitalism. I could use a stiff drink ….
Steve #405903 May 21, 2024 2:16 pm -4
There’s a simple answer to that @Arshad. Don’t hop onto the mouse wheel. The vampires work for you if you are a net saver. Once you have enough saved up, go for it. Assuming you are not near retirement, there should be some major fire sales in the business world over the next few. Be in a position to take advantage of it. Or go blow your paycheck on rotgut. Your choice.
Robbo #405902 May 21, 2024 2:16 pm 13
True. I never understand why anyone would go into the restaurant business. The margins are incredibly tight. One bump on the road sees you bankrupt. 250 years ago, restaurants didn’t exist. People ate at home or at friends.
Ostei Kozelskii #405904 May 21, 2024 2:21 pm 9
I thought about it very hard, but two things stayed my hand. First, the red tape required for starting a restaurant, even in Texas, is absolutely insane. Second, I don’t like the idea of having to police my own employees, making sure they’re not dipping their duke into the tambourine when they think nobody’s watching. All in all, just not worth the hassle and headaches to me.
Pozymandias #405945 May 21, 2024 4:19 pm 1
Keeping the semen content of the soup low is a major hassle.
cg2 #406006 May 22, 2024 7:40 am 6
Well, I first thought to upvote cause its funny, but then I thought to downvote cause its disgusting and possibly true. Think I’ll just leave it alone
Pozymandias #406178 May 22, 2024 4:57 pm 0
I didn’t think of the joke actually. It’s something Tyler Durden says in Fight Club.
Tars Tarkas #405954 May 21, 2024 4:31 pm 9
Meanwhile, Pedro runs a “Mexican Restaurant” in his house/ backyard, no L&I, no taxes, no inspectors and a port-a-poty in the back corner of his yard etc, at least according to VDH. A perfect example of Anarcho-tyranny.
Steve #405957 May 21, 2024 4:43 pm -7
Perfect example of capitalism! If people want to take the risk of food poisoning, that’s on them. Everyone else can look for the license on the wall if he really believes government does an outstanding job on health issues. *Cough* COVID *cough*
Tars Tarkas #405977 May 21, 2024 5:34 pm 10
First, it’s anarcho-tyranny. Second, Pedro’s customers are going to go to the hospital which they won’t pay for should they get food poisoning. I’m not saying the government does the best job, but that’s what we have. We are subject to all the rules. Pedro shouldn’t even be here, let alone running a restaurant out of his house. Call it what it is and deport Pedro and his whole damned extended fambly and all his customers and their famblies too..
Steve #405986 May 21, 2024 6:16 pm -4
It’s only anarcho-tyranny because someone defined that to mean (in this case) that citizens are held to a higher standard than illegals. But why isn’t the problem the business licenses and such in the first place? Is there some benefit obtained by mulcting businessmen for permission to hang out a shingle? How do I as a customer benefit from this system of legalized bribery? But sure, deport Pedro. Oh, wait. Government isn’t going to do that. They will just clamp down on you.
Ostei Kozelskii #406030 May 22, 2024 9:30 am 1
The benefit is bloody obvious–when you’re licensed you’re subject to health inspections, which provide customers with some peace of mind that they won’t be ingesting rat feces with their mashed potatoes. If you prefer the Third World model of restaurant operation,well…I don’t even want to say.
Steve #406115 May 22, 2024 1:40 pm 0
“Do you think that’s air you are breathing now? Hmm.” Out here in the real world, government oversight doesn’t have a great track record. I suspect most inspectors are trying to do a good job, the inspections are just too infrequent to catch anything like a bad batch of seafood. At best you might find some systemic issues. But if you think the same type who handled COVID so well signifies quality, you are free to look for the paper on the wall/door. If I’d rather have a different, competent certification organization, why won’t you allow that?
Steve #406116 May 22, 2024 1:48 pm 1
That’s the false dichotomy I see all the time from Lefties. If we oppose government schools, lefties believe we oppose education. If we oppose national health care, lefties believe we want everyone to be sick. If we oppose gun control, lefties believe we want blood in the streets. And so on.
Ostei Kozelskii #405967 May 21, 2024 5:18 pm 2
Sounds like the helluva business model. Why didn’t I think of that?
Hi-ya #406095 May 22, 2024 11:45 am 1
It’s must be a certain personality to own/ run restaurants. One I don’t possess
Xman #405932 May 21, 2024 3:36 pm 12
Naaah. C’mon, man. 250 years ago there were plenty of alehouses, taverns and inns. Yes, you didn’t take the missus and the kids to Chuck–Cheese three times a week, but there were restaurants.
Ostei Kozelskii #405940 May 21, 2024 4:09 pm 7
But there are differences. Taverns focus primarily on drink, and inns focus primarily on rooms and beds. Restaurants, sans accomodations and focusing primarily on meals, are a relatively new thing.
Robbo #405901 May 21, 2024 2:14 pm 2
We almost got there: ended up with loco, loco, loco.
pyrrhus #405915 May 21, 2024 2:43 pm 12
As evidenced by the constant looting of stockholders…If we still had securities laws and enforcement, the last 3 CEOs of Bed Bath and Beyond would be in prison for taking hundreds of millions from the market from their options, while simultaneously ripping the heart out of a formerly thriving business….
Ostei Kozelskii #405941 May 21, 2024 4:10 pm 8
It was a bloodbath and beyond…
Xin Loi #405998 May 21, 2024 10:07 pm 4
Before there was the Constitution, there was the Declaration. The Declaration claims the right to alter or abolish old forms of government and institute new ones to secure the safety and happiness of the people (Look it up!) Are you safe? Are you happy?
Hi-ya #406104 May 22, 2024 1:04 pm 0
If ever there was a time…
WillS #405745 May 21, 2024 8:45 am 34
It seems capitalism ( a market based economy) is a bit like a free society and may only be adequate for a moral society. The current bugger grandma for gains business environment brought to us via the financialization of the economy can only end in a failed system hallowed out by the bankers. This will only get worse.
Steve #405783 May 21, 2024 9:47 am 13
Both stories are about government intervention, in the Red Lobster, even the idea of creating the legal fiction of a living thing with rights called Red Lobster, LLC or whatever it identifies as, and the Harper’s Ferry story about state preemption of what is legitimately a matter of subsidiarity. The whole vile financialization story is one government intervention after another with the effect, if not the intent, to destroy traditional America.
3g4me #405818 May 21, 2024 10:39 am 15
Steve: This. Local greed, ambition, and short sightedness, aided and abetted by rootless vulture capitalist financiers and, as always, exacerbated by diversity.
WillS #405833 May 21, 2024 11:09 am 8
Brought to us by K Street and our fine corporations. CEO logic, “the next quarter is all that matters”.
Steve #405847 May 21, 2024 11:44 am -6
CEO logic, “the next quarter is all that matters”. Mock it all you like, but unfortunately, once you get on the mouse wheel, that’s pretty close to the truth. That’s when the tax bill is due, that’s when the investors want to see the reports. What happens a year out is still a year away. It’s not shortsightedness if you are focusing on the most important time horizon for your business. Want to encourage a longer time horizon? Change the system, so incentives align with lower time preference. Or keep shouting at clouds. Whatever works for you.
WillS #406000 May 21, 2024 11:20 pm 4
It’s not a right/wrong argument. It’s a wrong perspective timeline. Thinking 5 years out should be the minimum. The current system selects poorly and it doesn’t work well. The system is broken or just stupid.The board is supposed to think long term and keep CEO in check.
Steve #406004 May 22, 2024 12:07 am -1
I agree it would be nice if CEOs of publicly traded firms took a longer view of things. (In a privately held firm, he can. He can afford to Blue Sky things for decades into the future.) But investors are not noted for patience. If you don’t perform this quarter, market cap is going to plunge, and someone else will be CEO within a year’s time anyway. But not even boards of directors serve any business purpose anymore. It’s all about virtue signaling.
herrman #405754 May 21, 2024 8:55 am 37
Ruling structures axiomatically attract people who will game the system for their own benefit. They rarely have any considerations for the downstream effects of those actions. I moved from Idaho (a “good” red state) to Michigan ( a “no-good” bluish state). The level of corruption is about the same. In Idaho it’s the good old boy network of big business and large landowners selling out the population to carpetbagging land speculators. In Michigan it’s corrupt leftists selling out their populations to foreigners for a bite of the grift.The solution is a government structure that severely binds the hands of the administrators of the state. It was the original idea in the U.S., but of course was immediate restructured to benefit those who are in charge of that structure. Inevitable. What the solution to this conundrum is I have no idea. Perhaps it just needs to be burned down occasionally to allow brief periods of actual freedom.
Jack Dobson #405759 May 21, 2024 9:01 am 26
Jefferson was onto something.
LineInTheSand #405858 May 21, 2024 12:01 pm 2
Hermann, why did you leave Idaho?
herrman #405873 May 21, 2024 1:06 pm 11
Wanted a small farm, way too expensive now in Idaho. Moved to the UP, love it.
WillS #406001 May 21, 2024 11:25 pm 0
Snow….yeah.
Marko #405764 May 21, 2024 9:09 am 14
Capitalism, like every other -ism and -cracy, works when the host population is high-trust and K-selected. Red Lobster is prole shit. I am not sad that they got pirated, and maybe that’s what vulture capitalists are for. Now do it for Applebee’s.
Jack Dobson #405767 May 21, 2024 9:25 am 30
Even with high trust societies and K-selected folks, a tight leash has to be kept on capitalism. The robber barons existed in an 85 percent white society although they were pikers compared to today’s version. Something about the system brings out the inner Dindu/Tribe member even in our people.
Steve #405786 May 21, 2024 9:52 am 4
Robber barons get a bad rap because Progressives write the history books, so naturally do not distinguish between entrepreneurs and political entrepreneurs. apolitical entrepreneursucceeds primarily by influencing government to subsidize his business or industry, or to enact legislation or regulation that harms his competitors. https://mises.org/mises-daily/truth-about-robber-barons
Arshad Ali #405887 May 21, 2024 1:48 pm 6
Yes, and those robber barons were curbed only because there existed a majority white population at the time.
Steve #405905 May 21, 2024 2:22 pm -2
Have you considered looking into something other than (((Progressive))) history and economics books? Doesn’t it seem coincidental that every “crisis” calls for a new regulation or tax, to the benefit of (((Progressives)))?
3g4me #405812 May 21, 2024 10:32 am 35
Jack: I have to be honest here – I don’t particularly care aboutRed Lobster specifically (last ate there maybe 35 years ago?) – although I understand how greed and the financialization of social capital undermined it. But the linked story about Harper’s Ferry was like a kick in the gut. Local people stripped of any say in how or where they live all so a few people can make a buck. And always the same excuse “For the schools! For the firefighters!” Always the supposed good of the whole while destroying the very folks who make that whole.It also hits close to home – our Ozark property is about four heavily-wooded hilly miles from an official state ‘wilderness area’ established in 1972. And local people were forced from their land back then under eminent domain. So a few people made tourist bucks at the cost of other people who lost their land and homes. And in 2023 some state government hacks with wealthy friends floated the idea of expanding this area and turning it into a ‘national park preserve.” One of the developers’ models is a national park preserve in . . . West Virginia.In keeping with your comment, it’s not just the Jewish financiers and lawyers who make these travesties possible. Lots of short-sighted, greedy, selfish White cuckservatards who work hand-in-hand with the financiers and get a big fat payout. And get applauded by numurrikan voters like Yinching Lin-Chen.My hatred knows no bounds.
Steve #405816 May 21, 2024 10:38 am 8
Right. And don’t let it be missed that the principal offender in the Harper’s Ferry atrocity was a Republicunt from Venezuela, one Sen. Patricia Rucker. I get that is a power the Constitution reserved to the States, but that’s just another reason the Constitution should be abolished before it causes even more destruction.
3g4me #405840 May 21, 2024 11:31 am 19
Patricia rucker is a Venezuelan married to a black. Harper’s Ferry is 97% White.
Ostei Kozelskii #405909 May 21, 2024 2:26 pm 10
If you’re willing to vote for that, just maybe you deserve the remorseless sodomization you’re sure to receive.
Pozymandias #405958 May 21, 2024 4:50 pm 9
I don’t know anything about this Rucker fucker but think I could write a good campaign commercial for her. Flags wave in the wind… sappy music plays…fade to action shot of the candidate doing something ridiculous like driving a tractor or shucking corn. Then the voice-over starts – “Patricia came to the US with only the designer clothes on her back and a small steamer trunk full of gold coins. She started her political career by winning a local election in Harper’s Ferry after her opponent died mysteriously…” Salt of the earth these people are.
Ostei Kozelskii #405969 May 21, 2024 5:21 pm 5
I’ve got some very special salt to put in her feijoda.
Jack Dobson #405821 May 21, 2024 10:48 am 19
The principles and interests of cucks always are principal and interest. I also live in an isolated area although the jurisdiction seems counter-intuitive at first blush until you consider the realities of cuckservatism, whichcausesrather than outright promotes diversity and other cancerous outgrowths. That leads to an even quicker hell. Anyone who thinks Republicans are their friends was sorely disappointed when the truth came out about the Tooth Fairy.
Pozymandias #405960 May 21, 2024 4:53 pm 6
“The principles and interests of cucks always are principal and interest” This is brilliant!
Jack Dobson #405964 May 21, 2024 5:07 pm 5
Thanks, I’m proud of it.
WillS #406002 May 21, 2024 11:30 pm 0
What is that saying about pride…heady scratchy heady scratchy.
Hemid #405836 May 21, 2024 11:22 am 12
The Republican Party, top to bottom, markets itself as a Christian business. I think it’s a rare case of truth in advertising. We just have to remember: The purpose of a Christian business is to rip off Christians. The purpose of the rest of American business/finance isalsoto rip off Christians (statistically average Americans), so the normal people of “red” cities/counties/states get doubly screwed by public/private partnerships, eminent domain, etc. Democrats pay their voters. Republicans steal from them. Principled!
TempoNick #405850 May 21, 2024 11:45 am 11
Larry Schweikert once told me, “Democrats make money to get power; Republicans get power to make money.”
Jack Dobson #405867 May 21, 2024 12:23 pm 5
Great line and true.
Pozymandias #405961 May 21, 2024 4:55 pm 5
Lot’s of good one-liners today like yours about principle and interest and this one too!
Robbo #405900 May 21, 2024 2:13 pm 5
Exhibit A: Mitt Romney
Rogers Ranger #405733 May 21, 2024 8:25 am 45
The joke in this region for over a decade is to call the place black Lobster. Due to diverse hiring the service is horrible and the customer base for a long time has been composed mostly of “Satan’s charred minions.”
Abelard Lindsey #405744 May 21, 2024 8:44 am 13
I think DEI is mostly a PR distraction. The PE firms don’t give a shit because they have no intentions of holding the business for very long. So they let HR run things, along with the DEI racket, while the PR firms make their money off of sale of the assets. Of the two problems, DEI and PE driven financialization of the economy, the latter is far worse for the economy. Boeing suffers much more from the latter than the former.
Ostei Kozelskii #405846 May 21, 2024 11:42 am 6
Which is worse? Pancreatic cancer or septicemic plague? Personally, I’d rather have neither.
ProZNoV #405753 May 21, 2024 8:54 am 12
Same customer base causing fast food restaurants to get rid of customer friendly soda fountains. (It’s diabetes in a cup anyway, so probably for the best)
Marko #405765 May 21, 2024 9:15 am 31
Excuse my selective elitism here, and I am nominally for the working man, but I think we should let these goyslop diabetes chains fall to predation. Let the diversity microwave meals at home. I live in an area that’s developing rapidly, so of course every other new building that goes up is an Arby’s or Panda Express. And the drive-through is regularly busy. 95% of these people are trash, and I am paying for their emergency room visits.
Jeffrey Zoar #405819 May 21, 2024 10:40 am 11
I remember back during the plandemic the drive thru line at McDonald’s was always wrapped around the building. The other day when I drove by the place was empty, nobody in line. Middle of the day. Signs of the times.
Ostei Kozelskii #405848 May 21, 2024 11:45 am 10
One can only hope the golden arches fall.
Steve #405853 May 21, 2024 11:50 am 6
I used to hit their drive-through for a $1 large iced tea, but now that it’s $2.59? Nazomuch. I’m not alone. There are a lot of people who skip it because it’s $30+ for a couple “value” meals and a “happy” meal.
Marko #405916 May 21, 2024 2:46 pm 6
Mickey Dee’s is always busy when I see it. Personally I’ve seen no slowdown in fast food demand overall. Subway is still busy despite having a horrible cardboard sandwich that was barely tolerable as a $5 footlong, much less a $15 footlong. Frankly I’m surprised that fast food is still going strong, even though it’s not fast and it’s not cheap nourishment.
Ostei Kozelskii #405942 May 21, 2024 4:13 pm 3
The footlong BMT on wheat is a dam’ good sandwich. And in my neck of the woods it doesn’t cost anywhere near $15.
Ostei Kozelskii #405844 May 21, 2024 11:38 am 10
I haven’t been to a Red Slobster in about 25 years, so I can’t comment on its dieversification, although I certainly don’t doubt it. What I can say, however, is that Popeye’s chicken certainly fits the mold you describe.Now Popeye’s makes some dam’ fine fried chicken, and I used to eat that stuff with some frequency. However, over time Popeye’s workforce became steadily more nuggrafied with the wholly predictable decline in competence ensuing. It got to the point that they were getting my simple order wrong about half the time. So I said screw it and haven’t been to a Popeye’s for a few years and never will again. Just as importing Hutus is suicidal for any city or country, so too is hiring many of them for any business.
Pozymandias #405963 May 21, 2024 5:06 pm 7
There are some restaurants where I long ago got used to the idea that your order was pretty much guaranteed to be correct *in quantity*. The workers had a pretty good idea of how heavy the bag needed to be. Exactly what went into it… Well, not so much.
Ostei Kozelskii #405971 May 21, 2024 5:23 pm 3
That works alright at Taco Bell. If, OTOH, you can’t stand dark-meat chicken, it’s no dam’ good.
Tom K #405949 May 21, 2024 4:21 pm 0
lyrics from a Beyonce original:When he f*ck me good, I take his ass to Red Lobster, ’cause I slayWhen he f*ck me good, I take his ass to Red Lobster, we gon’ slayIf he hit it right, I might take him on a flight on my chopper, I slayDrop him off at the mall, let him buy some J’s, let him shop up, ’cause I slayI might get your song played on the radio station, ’cause I slayI might get your song played on the radio station, ’cause I slayYou just might be a black Bill Gates in the making, ’cause I slayI just might be a black Bill Gates in the making
Ostei Kozelskii #405972 May 21, 2024 5:24 pm 8
We’ve fallen a long, long way since Peggy Lee.
Citizen of a Silly Country #405758 May 21, 2024 9:00 am 43
As someone who has gotten to know a fair amount of people in the investing/finance world (not private equity or hedge funds but guys who have boutique ETFs or managed accounts), my thought has always been what a waste of talent.These guys are exactly the kinds of men who in a different generation would have been the engineers and upper management of companies that made real things and/or fixed things. They would have been developing better products, better ways to configure the factory floor, better quality controls, better distribution systems, etc.Instead, they’re moving numbers around to squeeze an extra ten basis points out of the carry trade. I don’t blame them. The money and freedom is far better where they are – and no DEI meetings. But it is a huge waste of talent.
Alan Smithee #405810 May 21, 2024 10:29 am 11
It is the same thing in cable programming, which I had occasion to be involved in once upon a time. The intelligence, creativity and all-around human potential that existed below-the-line took me by surprise.Before I encountered them, I thought everyone involved in televsion had to be stupid. This was not the case. In my experience, the only places where stupidity was tolerated was if it was talent or one of the no-show Executive Producers. I would add that the EPs were, as far as I could tell, all Jews. And they showed up where actual work was taking place for only two reasons: when marquee names was on set or when a cute PA had been hired.
Guest #405824 May 21, 2024 10:56 am 23
The last time I checked, nearly 90% of the engineers graduating from MIT went to work on Wall Street or for hedge funds. Similarly, I can’t blame them, but what a societal waste.
Citizen of a Silly Country #405876 May 21, 2024 1:09 pm 9
Yep. I’ve met engineers. PhDs in computer science. A bunch of PhDs in finance who could have been engineers or whatever. Mathematicians. Etc. And all of good at applying their brains/knowledge to problems, except its finance problems. Imagine these guys solving problems that actually help society.
Arshad Ali #405888 May 21, 2024 1:51 pm 9
They can’t get jobs in their fields (engineering, math, physics, comp sci), so they gravitate to areas like quant finance. Just shows what kind of economy and society we now have.
Tars Tarkas #405837 May 21, 2024 11:23 am 19
This is also a fine way of sucking the top men out of every community in America.It used to be there was a major employer or 2 in most towns, often manufacturing. The top men in the town became upper management and engineering and the bottom men in the town became workers on the production floor. The middle worked the middle of this sector and the service sector in the town.Today, the company town is long gone, the top men move somewhere else and the bottom men either do drugs or sell drugs. The middle work in healthcare, prisons, policing or some other “service” sector job. It’s dysfunction writ large.I just pray that one day these bottom men are able to pay back the top men who did this to them and all the middle men who make fun of them. Though I suppose making fun of them is the only option. To do otherwise is to recognize how this came into being.
TempoNick #405892 May 21, 2024 2:00 pm 7
Someone else once pointed this out as well. The average small county seat had three or four banks, a couple of car dealerships and other businesses that were locally based, where people who had roots in the community were involved. With consolidation, all those decentralized positions of authority disappeared.
Tars Tarkas #405926 May 21, 2024 3:08 pm 9
Yes. They ripped the heart and soul out of every town, USA. Now the main employers (well, source of income) are the dole in some form, drug sales, “healthcare (also the dole),” corporate retail, lawyers of course, and other low wage stuff. If the town is lucky, maybe there is a prison they can work in. All the money is sucked out of the town. Where before there was a local 5&10, a locally owned gas station, hardware store and other locally owned retail, it’s Family Dollar, maybe a Walmart and Home Depot. A bunch of chain restaurants…Walmart played a huge role in destroying America. Walmart had an entire program specifically designed to help (force) manufacturers to close US factories and move production overseas. They were doing this at scale even before China was in the WTO. It started in the late-middle 90s. IDK if it still exists, but there was an article called “The Man Who Said no to Walmart” about the Snapper lawn mower company that went in depth in this. I also saw a documentary about it.The Waltons are second only to the Sacklers in their deserving of punishment. God them help if we are ever in charge. I have far less contempt for the Rosenbergs. They sold “their country” (putting aside if they were genuine Americans) out for ideology. That is far more understandable than someone who is already very rich selling out their country and countrymen for coin. I hold those who did this in the most contempt above anyone else.
The Wild Geese Howard #405863 May 21, 2024 12:13 pm 7
Citizen- For most engineers pay tops out pretty fast unless they come up with critical patents, a great idea, or start a company. This is unlike bankers, doctors, and lawyers, where even the mediocre and below average can do quite well. Pay engineers more like those other groups and the STEM shortage will mostly solve itself.
Arshad Ali #405890 May 21, 2024 1:54 pm 10
There is no STEM shortage. Last I heard was that 55% of new Ph.D. Engineers had no jobs — not even a post-doc.
Steve #405910 May 21, 2024 2:26 pm -5
What’s the point of a Ph.D. Engineer? There are not that many research or academic positions. If I were hiring engineers at the moment (no, I’m not, so don’t send any resumes) I’d think twice about even hiring a Ph.D. for less pay than a B.S., because he obviously knows nothing about optimization, which is kind of the whole point…
Lakelander #405883 May 21, 2024 1:36 pm 15
It is very depressing to think about the number of capable, intelligent young men whose vast potential was diverted towards financial engineering and other rent seeking activities for the ultimate benefit of our enemies. They produce nothing of actual value, don’t improve the national body in any way, but they are rewarded handsomely nonetheless. The purpose of a system is what it does.
Arshad Ali #405891 May 21, 2024 1:57 pm 10
They would have no jobs otherwise. That’s because of the hollowed-out real economy. It’s not their fault.Many financial engineers would happily take a more productive and satisfying job with half the wage. Those jobs aren’t out there.
Jack Boniface #405747 May 21, 2024 8:46 am 34
Mitt Romney is one of the vultures and is worth $300 million. He’s the last Establishment Republican the party nominated and remains the media’s paragon GOP politician. No wonder people moved to Trump, who, whatever his failings in business ethics, at least put up real buildings.https://www.celebritynetworth.com/richest-politicians/republicans/mitt-romney-net-worth/
Jack Dobson #405750 May 21, 2024 8:53 am 37
Mitt Romney, Sociopath-Hell, just the other day: “We’re involved in the world out of our own self-interest, and I laugh at the phrase “America First.” A society that encourages a monster like this one richly deserves its fate. The Bolsheviks existed for a reason.
Steve #405773 May 21, 2024 9:28 am 17
Seems to me Utah has all kinds of anthills they could stake that type down on top of.
Mike #405808 May 21, 2024 10:25 am 32
I remember back years ago when I still had cable, I would watch Jay Leno’s car show on whatever channel it was on. I always was suspicious of Leno, his nice guy act seemed like a thin veneer over the nasty guy underneath. Anyway, he had Romney on a show showing off some AMC muscle car his son had bought for him. It was a nice example of that era’s cars but he knew nothing about it and it obviously meant nothing to him except it was a thing he owned, no sentimental value as a gift from his son or as an example of a car from his youth or from his father’s company.He came across as barely human in that interview, someone who was trying to act normal but couldn’t pull it off convincingly. He’s the type of guy who sort of makes the case for actual reptilians.
Jack Dobson #405838 May 21, 2024 11:26 am 6
There’s no there there with comedians quite often. Johnny Carson in the States and Peter Sellers in the UK reportedly were bland, blank slates when not performing. Is it Romney-liked sociopathy? Maybe.
TempoNick #405898 May 21, 2024 2:07 pm -4
Romney is great on the radio. Some of his interviews with Sean Hannity back in 2012 were great. If only he could show that that charisma in other venues. But then again, these consultants also coach these candidates to always play it close to the vest. That’s why they all come across as boring and monotone. I guess people are convinced that this is what the public is looking for in an elected official.
Tars Tarkas #405979 May 21, 2024 5:41 pm 14
Romney is the lowest form of scum. This is a guy who supposedly made his living destroying profitable companies and stealing the pensions of their workers. He went and joined BLM in 2020. He’s all in on Ukraine too. He is the lowest of the low.
mmack #405980 May 21, 2024 5:46 pm 4
Anyway, he had Romney on a show showing off some AMC muscle car his son had bought for him. It was a nice example of that era’s cars but he knew nothing about it and it obviously meant nothing to him except it was a thing he owned, no sentimental value as a gift from his son or as an example of a car from his youth or from his father’s company.Irony of irony George Romney was a hard nosed, bottom line focused executive who saved American Motors by cutting the fat and focusing on small, fuel efficient cars. In the late 1950s his strategy paid off and Rambler pushed past Plymouth to take third place in yearly sales after Chevrolet and Ford. He boosted the stock price from $3/share to $90/share when he left the AMC Presidency in 1962.And his replacement Roy Abernethy pissed it all away trying to take on GM, Ford, and Chrysler toe-to-toe, model for model. No way in Hell they were going to do it.Under a guy like Romney AMC could’ve been a niche car maker like Subaru and made bank catering to markets the Big Three and the Japanese couldn’t touch. Too late AMC tried being an American Subaru. Sadly by the early 1980s they went to Renault looking for cash. As I said when Nissan went to Renault in the 2000s, “If you’re going to the French hat in hand for cash, you’re boned.”
Bourbon #405889 May 21, 2024 1:54 pm 3
Can you provide us with an example of a Romanov having deployed such language? Here’s a counterexample:
Jack Dobson #405955 May 21, 2024 4:32 pm 1
I cannot and can’t even connect the dots since I didn’t reference language.
Bourbon #405970 May 21, 2024 5:22 pm 4
Sorry, everything is all out of order now. But back when there were far fewer kkk0mments on the thread, it went something like this:Mitt Romney, Sociopath-Hell: ‘I laugh at the phrase “America First.”’Jack Dobson: “A society that encourages a monster like this one richly deserves its fate. The Bolsheviks existed for a reason.”And my question was whether you knew of anyone in the Romanov fambly who had ever laughed at, say, the Serfs, or the Kulaks, in the fashion of a Clit Romney, or a Marie “Let them eat cake” Antoinette.It’s possible that there were such psychopaths amongst the Romanovs, but, if so, I’ve never heard of them.And as Caudill is saying over at G@b,“This really sheds new light on the Bolshevik Revolution if the Tsar was commissioning paintings like this.“https://gab.com/Caudill/posts/112418458590942948The commissioning of that painting would tend to indicate to me that the Romanovs were deeply concerned about the plight of the Serfs & the Kulaks.Which, in turn, would be why the Bolsheviks so despised the Romanovs.From everything I’ve ever read about the Romanovs, they lost the war with World J00ry precisely because they were too nice, too kind, too naive, too thoughtful, too peaceful, too innocent, too patient, too clueless.
Horace #405965 May 21, 2024 5:12 pm 7
“The Bolsheviks existed for a reason.”Yes!I’ve been a fanatic anti-communist since I read Gulag Archipelago when I was 14-15. However, there is simply no question that healthy societies well-run by their ruling classes do not get successfully infested with communists. Every communist regime that succeeded in taking root was preceded by a government where the ruling class was behaving badly enough so that, when the chips were down, their working classes didn’t have their back.Those who currently rule America deserve to be bayoneted in a forest hut then dumped down a mine shaft far more than the Romanov’s ever did. If a pack of Bolsheviks went for the Romney’s and the McConnell’s and the Grahamesty’s, I would stay on the sideline, laughing, even if I knew I were next. Hell, if they were ethnocentric nationalist communists like the Chinese or Vietnamese, I would join them in the spirit of the perfect is the enemy of the good enough, and nationalist anything is ‘good enough’ when the alternative is any variety of internationalism.
RDittmar #405768 May 21, 2024 9:25 am 28
I was going to bring up Mittens as well after reading Z-man’s post. Rombleycare’s alleged career as a “capitalist” proved another big tell as to what a bunch of phonies the cucks were and are. Rombleycare rolls into town with his crew of sharpies and they asset strip businesses – even when those assets are in the form of employee retirement accounts – to give themselves a big payday. To Con., Inc. this meant he was history’s greatest entrepreneur – our generation’s very own Andrew Carnegie. When Trump – a man who actually built his wealth by building things and creating real value – came along, he was just a complete failure/blowhard who produced nothing but hot air about his “alleged” fortune. All of the cuck’s interest in “free-market capitalism” when right out the window when the mean tweets started dropping.
Ed #405769 May 21, 2024 9:26 am 27
To this day, I am still ashamed and embarrassed I voted for Romney.
thezman #405776 May 21, 2024 9:35 am 33
I take pride in having voted against him twice. I voted for Ted Kennedy over Willard when I lived in Mass, as even a drunken Hibernian murderer is better than Romney.
Xman #405882 May 21, 2024 1:35 pm 7
“I voted for Ted Kennedy over Willard when I lived in Mass” I voted for Heinrich Himmler as a write-in candidate in my last local election…
Robbo #405906 May 21, 2024 2:23 pm 0
Did he win?
Xman #405933 May 21, 2024 3:40 pm 2
Nah, it was a protest vote. All the candidates were unopposed…
Spingerah #405907 May 21, 2024 2:23 pm 2
I sure wish I could say that lol,The shame. At least I’ll never have to see any Mormon relatives in Utah again. South Park will teach you all you need to know about Mormons.
duttchmn007 #405777 May 21, 2024 9:36 am 8
I got you beat; I sent him $400. I know: schmuck! Wish I’d known his true self then.
Jannie #405801 May 21, 2024 10:14 am 17
Last 20+ years have been a wake-up call. In 2008 I seriously thought McCain was “America’s Last Hope” to “Save America” from “Communist Manchurian Black Panther” Obama. Then he went to work for Obama and helped found ISIS and the Ukrainian Nazi movement. Ashamed to have voted for him. I should have just sat out 2008.
Vizzini #405835 May 21, 2024 11:16 am 25
You’d think the mask rip-offs for both Bushes, Romney and McCain would be enough to make the Zero GOP argument. Even Trump — his actual four years in office were virtually nothing of what he promised and a big sloppy kiss to blacks and Jews, so I see no reason to think he’ll do any better a second time around. The only reason he amuses me is that for some reason this ’90s moderate Democrat in Republican clothing makes the left so mad.
Brandon Laskow #405870 May 21, 2024 12:38 pm 3
I actually drove to Reno NV to campaign for McLame, the only time I ever participated in a political campaign, because I knew how much Obummer sucked with his radical background and he was the farthest thing from a racial healer. At least McLame was an American patriot thus sucked less.
Mike #405920 May 21, 2024 2:52 pm 10
He seemed to be an American patriot. He wasn’t, he was an evil POS.
Brandon Laskow #405999 May 21, 2024 10:36 pm 3
Totally. I know better now.
Pozymandias #405989 May 21, 2024 6:41 pm 5
With patriots likeMcCain andRomney who needs traitors?
Spingerah #405908 May 21, 2024 2:24 pm 1
Yup metoo
TempoNick #405894 May 21, 2024 2:03 pm 3
In fairness, Romney did create Staples and a few other successes. But yeah, they also ran a junkyard for junk companies.
Spingerah #405899 May 21, 2024 2:13 pm 11
Romney, as I recall, one of his sons was in on the Ukraine gift, getting the bucks right along with Hunter when mittens was asked why none of his sons were in the millitary (Iraq at the time) he said his sons were working on his campaigns & that was their contribution. I hope the SOB dies of anal cancer. He is so slimy & to think I actually voted for the POS.
ProZNoV #405751 May 21, 2024 8:53 am 32
Seems like a merger/partnership between Spirit Airlines, Boeing and Red Lobster would’ve been a fantastic opportunity for some real DEI synergy. Now, we’ll never know. Alas.
Ostei Kozelskii #405912 May 21, 2024 2:36 pm 4
Supposedly, one of the key factors in Red Slobster’s bankruptcy was the claws kept falling off their lobsters…
mmack #405978 May 21, 2024 5:35 pm 6
As the old joke about the one clawed lobster went: “Send this one back and give me the winner!”
In My Soup #405772 May 21, 2024 9:28 am 28
The Harper’s Ferry story gets an Every Single Time badge.
3g4me #405830 May 21, 2024 11:03 am 8
I thought so initially, but not certain now. Schaufeld’s wife’s maiden name is Shihadeh. Either way, both support feminism, blacks, etc., and dismiss rural heritage Whites as bigoted and stupid.
3g4me #405869 May 21, 2024 12:33 pm 10
I was wrong to doubt. Schaufeld is Every SIngle Time. Wife must be Mizrahi or Sephardic.
My Comment #405780 May 21, 2024 9:44 am 27
Americans used to take pride in making things. Now they just take outside in having money no matter how it was gained.I have seen this going on since the 50s. After WW2 American car companies had a huge market opportunity so what did they do? They pushed aside the car guys and turned things over to finance. Quality sank and American cars became a joke.Around 1970 my father worked in quality control at a company that made wallboard (now called sheet rock). He was pushed onto early retirement because he refused to pass bad board as mandated unofficially by finance. The company had the brilliant idea of laying off all their salespeople and transferring sales to another product group to save money. Problem was the sales people knew all the problems with the product and in mass went to the top competitor. The company my dad worked for went bankrupt. Before finance took over they were profitable just not as profitable as finance and the board wanted.Of course what happened there is now embedded throughout the whole system. Short term profits are all that matter. That of course is why we gave our supply chain to China.It is also why the chamber of commerce wants to destroy the country by flooding it with cheap labor. Nothing matters besides getting more cash now.
PrimiPilus #405852 May 21, 2024 11:50 am 4
It’s what I’ve long called “The Storm of Cash.” Seems to me that it’s the primary engine driving everything in our world now … American’s world, that is, maybe even the entire Western world.
WOPR #405771 May 21, 2024 9:27 am 23
From the Harper’s Ferry article: Just blocks away from the hotel construction site, Yinching Lin-Chen is frustrated by who she sees as “small town people who don’t want change.” See, all true Americans want that resort. The couple from VA pushing this are liberals.
Ostei Kozelskii #405913 May 21, 2024 2:39 pm 3
“All change is change for the worse.”– Saul Bellow
Dr_Mantis_Toboggan_MD #405782 May 21, 2024 9:46 am 22
My favorite Jim Morrison quote was “I want to have my kicks before the whole shithouse goes up in flames.” Capitalism always ends in monopoly.I don’t know what other economic system we could use, but I think some of the other commenters might be on to something when they talk about the complete lack of morality of the financial class.I think as this country becomes more diverse and more morally degenerate, the only thing that will hold a lid on it will be a large-scale tyranny that makes our present situation look free in comparison. We need to regulate the hell out of Wall Street, but there’s no movement in the ruling class to do such a thing. Just as we will never deal with the nation’s debt until it implodes, our rulers will never do anything to hurt the financial class that bribes them at every opportunity.As for the F-35, it is a classic example of why our procurement system is broken. The airplane is basically a good airframe, but it has too many compromises because it was like the old saying a horse designed by committee, which is a camel. It doesn’t accelerate well because the airframe is so bulky to account for the lift fan for the B-version, which is replacing Harriers for both the Marines and Royal Air Force/Navy.The problem with the DOD is that every program has to be a joint one, even if the services’ requirements are completely different. The old F-111 Aardvark was the first one of these joint airplanes, but the Navy was unable to accept that this bomber could be made into a long-range interceptor.Admiral Thomas Connolly sacrificed his fourth star, telling the Senate Armed Services Committee that “there isn’t enough thrust in Christendom to fix this plane.” The Navy was allowed to cancel its version of the F-111 and build the F-14, which was later killed by Dick Cheney because he hated Grumman and wanted them out of business, which happened a few years later. I’ve always loathed that evil man ever since.And you have the procurement system which incentivizes contractors to come in with these unrealistically low bids. And then you have the customer constantly changing their mind, sending new specifications as the “good idea fairy” keeps churning out chaos.As for the Navy’s stupid ship procurement program, this was an example of the cult of transformationalism, where these wizards of smart thought they could overturn decades of knowledge in how to build and crew warships with these converted ferry boats and weird destroyers the size of a WWII pocket battleship with 155mm guns that are being removed because their guided ammo costs a million bucks a shot. Also, these guns can’t shoot any regular 155mm ammo (the standard size of artillery rounds) because…well…reasons.The Littoral Combat Ship can barely defend itself and the so-called “mission modules” that would’ve allowed a ship to change from a minesweeper to a small corvette to take out enemy ships were found to be unworkable.The Navy leaders threw away the Navy’s previous practice of evolutionary change on its ships and decided to take big technological leaps, something fueled by post-Gulf War arrogance.And now our Navy is the smallest it’s been in decades. And the frigate designed to replace the LCS? The Navy just had to redesign it and now what was supposed to have 85% commonality with the FREMM frigates from France and Italy is now down to 15% and is three years late.
Steve #405804 May 21, 2024 10:19 am 3
Capitalism always ends in monopoly. Only if the business is truly innovative. Rockefeller invested in research and development, and as a result, was able to sell kerosene at 8 cents per gallon when those using inferior methods were breaking even at 30 cents per gallon. Most of the time it’s not capitalism that ends in monopoly, but corporatism, where some connected person buys up the right government official(s) and they rule for him or against his competitors. I know, not what the Progressive history books tell you…
Drive-By Shooter #405822 May 21, 2024 10:50 am 13
I don’t know what other economic system we could use Why do you believe with the Marxists and the libertarians that it’s a matter of all or nothing? We need to regulate the hell out of Wall Street Nope. That experiment has been run already. We need to liquidate Wall Street. Abolishing incorporation of all types is the way forward, and to this we need a thorough system of antizionist restrictions upon all of Jacob’s kids and their zombies. They must be excluded from,at minimum, all participation in banking, lawyering, and accounting.
Dr_Mantis_Toboggan_MD #405860 May 21, 2024 12:05 pm 9
I would say that the bankers haven’t been regulated at all since they write their own regulations, a classic case of the fox guarding the chicken coop. If you’re a congressman making $130k per year, why wouldn’t you go along with the nice lobbyists from Wall Street with their pre-written “regulations” that preserve their monopolies and freeze out any upstart competitors with excessive compliance costs? There’s little wonder that most people who go to Congress leave their as multi-millionaires.
Xman #405885 May 21, 2024 1:39 pm 5
“I don’t know what other economic system we could use” Well, national socialism was a Third Way between communism and vulture capitalism, but somehow it got a bad name…
Steve #405959 May 21, 2024 4:52 pm -1
I read the story of how the Navy shitcanned the Ardvark in favor of the Tomcat, a great read one that is emblematic of why bureaucrats should never be involved in anything.I wasn’t aware that Cheney hated Grumman and wanted them gone. Any idea as to why?
mmack #405976 May 21, 2024 5:33 pm 5
I read the story of how the Navy sh-t-canned the Aardvark in favor of the Tomcat, a great read one that is emblematic of why bureaucrats should never be involved in anything.That was the Late, “Great” Robert McNamara, who prior to being SecDef was President of Ford Motor Company. Bob had the GREAT idea that if cars could utilize a common platform to cut development costs and speed production (nip and tuck the Falcon to make the Mustang, pull and stretch the Falcon to make the mid-size Fairlane, shrink and cut the Lincoln Continental to make a Thunderbird) then surely it would work for an airplane, right?Well, cars don’t need to take off or land on aircraft carriers so there’s a flaw in that logic right there.
Steve #406120 May 22, 2024 1:59 pm -2
Don’t fret the downvotes. Didn’t realize there was another person using that handle, and someone apparently got drunk and went through downvoting every post from “Steve”. Sorry you got caught up in it, but the puerile pettiness, or maybe just the feminism, is kind of funny when you think about it.
Maniac #405729 May 21, 2024 8:16 am 20
There’s another reason they went tits-up: their food sucked. Out of curiosity, I drove to the closest one to me, which was about an hour away, and was unimpressed.
thezman #405732 May 21, 2024 8:20 am 37
I never got the appeal of Red Lobster. Many moons ago I was on a business trip and the people I was with suggested we go there for a meal. I forget what I ordered, but I remember it was swimming in butter. On the plate was a blog of mashed potatoes sitting in a pool of melted butter. The thing is, all casual dining is crap food. Olive Garden is a hate crime against Italians. But, people like it because it is a cheap night out usually.
Jack Dobson #405735 May 21, 2024 8:31 am 18
It ceased to be cheap, too. Inflation hit seafood prices some time back, and after experimenting with shrinkflation and adding chicken dishes and so forth, the company was forced to hike prices to keep afloat. Covid piled on while that was happening to them. Also, after going to the franchise model, the variations between locations became even more pronounced. Further, the locations often were near shopping malls, which have become ghost towns due to diversity and online shopping.
Hoagie #405736 May 21, 2024 8:34 am 29
” hate crime against Italians”. That’s the best description of the Olive Garden I have ever seen I shall be using it over and over again. Thank you.
Ostei Kozelskii #405918 May 21, 2024 2:47 pm 5
You should see the movie Big Night (1996) starring Stanley Tucci, Tony Shaloub, Isabella Rossellini, Minnie Driver, Campbell Scott and Ian Holm. It’s all about the Italian restaurant bidniss (set in New Jersey in 1954), and is funny as hell, although also fairly serious. You’ll also be starvin’ like Marvin when the final frame rolls.
Mr. House #405741 May 21, 2024 8:43 am 22
“Olive Garden is a hate crime against Italians.” Cheap imitation. Kinda like everything about our culture and society.
Mr. House #405743 May 21, 2024 8:43 am 19
Men: Cheap imitationWomen: Cheap imitationMilitary: Expensive imitationReligion: Perverted imitationect ect ect
Ostei Kozelskii #405919 May 21, 2024 2:48 pm 1
Fake and ghey, one might say…
mmack #405749 May 21, 2024 8:51 am 16
I suspect it’s a swirling combination of factors:1) Certainly COVID-19 hurt the chain in areas where draconian lockdowns were stupidly yet vigorously enforced. But even where I live Big Blue Dem City finally dropped the charade in 2022. Probably more likely is the more Biden Bucks it takes to go to dinner these days wiped out the folks who couldjustafford it.2) As you say, if youcanafford to go out to eat, you want your purchases to count for something. I won’t go into painful details but theLASTtime The Lovely 🥰 Mrs. and I went to Red Lobster for dinner, now a decade or more ago, the server had to tell her not one, but both of the items she ordered (her original order, then its replacement) were sold out. We cancelled dinner, paid for our drinks, and left for another restaurant with better food and a better stocked kitchen. I can think of multiple family owned restaurants near me that offer better seafood dishes for just a few dollars more than Red Lobster. Sans the butter you complained about.3) As you point out, financial shenanigans work, until they don’t. I think back to the 1980s and Junk Bonds which looked like a PHENOMINAL idea, until they crashed. Man Plans and God Laughs and all that. All these Very Clever Boys and Girls (Hat Tip to Severian for that one) keep the plates spinning until some Bull or Bear rushes in and slaps them off the spinner. So long as the Very Clever Boys and Girls don’t get punished, it’s all good, eh?So, I would suspect, based on what you said, the grift could be kept going until the people who use the criteria “As long as it’s cheap, I’ll eat there” didn’t even have the money to eat there anymore, and the folks that did looked at the offerings and said “Y’know, I’ll spend the $10 – 20 more and get a good meal.”
Mr. House #405762 May 21, 2024 9:07 am 10
Or the cost of their debt went up. Why do you think they’ve been holding rates as low as they have for as long as they have? We broke baby. Nothing in our “economy” can function at 5%. Wait until the next time they cut to zero, you gonna see some real inflation then.
mmack #405845 May 21, 2024 11:41 am 2
Agreed. They may have been hit with the double whammy of falling revenues and higher debt service. One of those situations nobody considers until it happens to them.
Steve #405866 May 21, 2024 12:21 pm 0
And, yet, it seems someone should have been able to predict that interest rates under 1% couldn’t last. Especially when the yield curve inverted.
Mr. House #405936 May 21, 2024 3:57 pm 4
I think many of them thought it would be another decade of 0%. But that is what 2020 was really about, we went out to the world and asked for another decade of 0% and were told to fuck off. Hence covid and everything since. If they could do 0% now they would, but they can’t. Hence turning the dial up to 11 to start a war, be it civil or global. Why do you think all the news has talked about since the FED started raising was when rates would go back down? With the fraud market at 40k? We need lower rates? Really?
Steve #405948 May 21, 2024 4:21 pm -2
0% is crazytalk. Would you lend a stranger $1,000 with terms that if nothing bad happens, he will pay you $1,000 in 5 years? If something bad happens you get back less or possibly nothing? The only way that makes any sense is in the deflationary period of, for example, the late 19th century.
Mr. House #405937 May 21, 2024 3:58 pm 4
Think about it: https://wallstreetonparade.com/2020/05/wall-streets-financial-crisis-preceded-covid-19-chart-and-timeline/
Steve #405951 May 21, 2024 4:25 pm -3
The Fed is more of a “pushing on a rope” thing. It’s more accurate to say they follow where the markets lead, not the other way around. But yes, I agree it was not COVID. But it also wasn’t really the Fed, in this case, either. All the high-powered money Congress was dishing out to everyone it could corrupt had to lead to inflation — less goods produced, more money to buy those goods. The spending under Trump made it inevitable.
Brandon Laskow #405875 May 21, 2024 1:09 pm 2
One good thing about the snobbery of the inner Bay Area is that none of these chain casual restaurants exist here. I’ve never eaten at Red Lobster or Olive Garden.
Ostei Kozelskii #405914 May 21, 2024 2:42 pm 2
I will say one small thing for Red Slobster. Back in the 70s they made the best dam’ hush puppies on the planet. They were the length of a cigarette but about twice the circumference, and had lots of sage. Totally delish. Alas, they stopped making those hush puppies long ago. Maybe that also factored into their financial woes.
Barnard #405738 May 21, 2024 8:39 am 23
The quality of the food and service only played a minor role in their demise. Zman is right about the vulture capital aspect which overwhelms every other factor. I looked at their menu online and was surprised it wasn’t more expensive. Red Lobster ended up in a bad spot in the market, especially if they were attracting vibrant diners. The lack of tips and other problems they cause is going to drive away your best wait staff as well.
ProZNoV #405756 May 21, 2024 8:56 am 7
I’d love to see a Zman piece about “private equity.” It sounds like Gordon Gekko, but on steroids.
Evil Sandmich #405742 May 21, 2024 8:43 am 29
15 to 20 years ago it was pretty decent, as such things go. Somewhere along the way it was like someone closed down the original Red Lobster and opened a chain of like-named restaurants that were just a poor copy of the original. There has been a lot of that though, everything has been coin-clipped to the point that it is just a half-remembered memory of a better time.
btp #405737 May 21, 2024 8:35 am 19
In before, “But that’s not real capitalism!” It is, guys. It really is.
Mr. House #405746 May 21, 2024 8:45 am 4
Nah, its corporatism. Capitalism requires failure, corporatism fails all at once! which is what we’re going to get.
btp #405755 May 21, 2024 8:55 am 18
Well, I was in before it, but it didn’t work. Yes, Mr. House. True Capitalism has never been tried. We know.
Jack Dobson #405761 May 21, 2024 9:05 am 13
The conditioning about capitalism is at the same level as equalitarianism. The difference is that on paper capitalism should work, and sometimes even does, but it requires interventions and regulations that run counter to the myth and even comes up short then. Corporatism is capitalism, and is the inevitable end stage when someone does not ride her on it, and even at then probably gets there.
Tom K #405774 May 21, 2024 9:31 am 2
“ride herd on it”?“ride her” works too.
Jack Dobson #405787 May 21, 2024 9:53 am 1
Works better, maybe. Typos are fun.
Steve #405775 May 21, 2024 9:32 am -4
Disagree. Corporatism is what you get when you try to merge government and business. That’s what Mussolini’s book said, anyway. Kinda like in Aliens. The only solution is to nuke the capitals from orbit.
Jack Dobson #405790 May 21, 2024 9:55 am 10
The two invariably merge without muscular intervention. The United States has become a fascist entity, just not in the way the blue-haired and pierced non-binaries mean it (to the extent they mean anything at all).
Steve #405809 May 21, 2024 10:25 am -7
Right. So do you dispense with the one that produces goods and services (including your daily bread, for those who will otherwise start screaming about materialism) or with the one which seems to have either orchestrated where we are now or was powerless to prevent it?
Ostei Kozelskii #405923 May 21, 2024 3:00 pm 5
Government and big bidniss have been in bed together in America for a very, very long time. What’s different now, however, is that they’re turning their schlongs on us.
Jeffrey Zoar #405826 May 21, 2024 11:00 am 5
The palace economy of which I often complain is probably necessary. The critical part is who is occupying the palace and how are they running it, and for who’s benefit
Steve #405855 May 21, 2024 11:56 am -3
It’s an evil, yes, but necessary? That always seems to be just assumed. What is it that you expect of government that it actually does? If you make lists, pros on one side, cons the other, which list is the more compelling?
Mr. House #405763 May 21, 2024 9:09 am 3
has true anything ever been tried, being that we are human? I mean we generally corrupt everything
Steve #405778 May 21, 2024 9:36 am -3
Most of our lives we’ve tried anarchy, and it almost always works. If your neighbor wants to borrow your chainsaw, he asks, you decide, and that’s it. You can live peacefully regardless of the answer. The problem is when he appeals to “authorities” to make you lend him the chainsaw. One side or the other is leaving unhappy with the decision, with or without justification. Riffing off Clinton, it’s the authorities, stupid.
3g4me #405823 May 21, 2024 10:53 am 9
btp: Husband and I haverepeatedlyhad this same argument. He’s still convinced that True Capitalism, without bad government intervention, would work because of muh magic market. I disagree, and round and round we go.
Steve #405857 May 21, 2024 11:58 am -3
You already know this, but you married a smart man.
Arshad Ali #405893 May 21, 2024 2:01 pm 5
Sounds like an overdose of Ayn Rand to me.
Ostei Kozelskii #405925 May 21, 2024 3:06 pm 7
You already know this, but your husband married a smart woman. Capitalism, in addition to its other faults voluminously enumerated above, annihilates culture, tradition and aesthetics. Everything falls before the diktats of the profit margin. And the capitalist society becomes etiolated, shallow, vulgar and nihilistic. Unchecked capitalism does all that. It is every bit as totalizing as communism.
Steve #405935 May 21, 2024 3:53 pm -4
How are you defining “capitalism”? You do with your stuff as you like (obligatory caveats) hardly seems to imply any of this, let alone what’s posted elsewhere here. Depending on your definition, we might be in agreement. I, too, would despise a system which did that. *Cough* socialism *cough*.
Ostei Kozelskii #405950 May 21, 2024 4:22 pm 6
Capitalism as unchecked, unregulated free enterprise. Any society defined, in large measure, by its adherence to this system, will eventually be transmogrified into something grotesque and hideous, and then bulldozed into a trench. America was thus warped and is now in the process of being razed.
Steve #405962 May 21, 2024 4:57 pm -3
OK, now what do you mean by “free enterprise”? I’m guessing we are not using the same definition, you doing with your stuff yadda yadda. The most effective check on free enterprise is people not buying your product. The most effective “regulation” is people not buying your product unless you meet their standards. In other words, capitalism.
Ostei Kozelskii #405974 May 21, 2024 5:27 pm 3
Free enterprise is economic democracy, and as we’ve seen from governmental democracy, it’s no dam’ good for anybody except for a certain form of elite. A terrible society imposed from the top down or chosen freely by the masses is still a terrible society.
Steve #405981 May 21, 2024 5:47 pm -3
Free enterprise is economic democracy. OK, agree to disagree, I guess. I’m not seeing how society would be better if I were compelled to buy or not buy a certain lawnmower, at the whim of some authority figure. If a guy wants Rocky Road, let him buy Rocky Road, for pete’s sake, and society can go screw. Now granted, externalities, but is there a single larger externality than AINO?
Ostei Kozelskii #406038 May 22, 2024 9:52 am 3
Of what good is total freedom of choice when it leads to the terrible society? This reification of principle at the expense of pragmatism is what ruined the Right in America. I’ve seen the results of capitalism, and they leave much to be desired. Now having said that, I’m not opposed to capitalism per se. I simply prefer that it be carefully managed rather than left to its own destructive devices. The libertarian model is not for me.
Steve #406103 May 22, 2024 1:02 pm -1
Letting someone decide which lawnmower he wants, or if he wants one at all, or choosing his favorite flavor of ice cream is hardly “total freedom of choice”. I get that drawing the line will take some thought, but it’s got to be somewhere that and brutal totalitarianism, isn’t it? What’s with the straw men?
Bourbon #405983 May 21, 2024 5:53 pm 2
Ostei Kozelskii: “Capitalism, in addition to its other faults voluminously enumerated above, annihilates culture, tradition and aesthetics.”I would argue that it’s not capitalism, but rather j00ry, to include the j00ish monopoly on all forms of media [jewspapers, j00vies, talmudvision channels, scr0tial media websites, to include j00ish pr0n], plus of course the j00ish monopoly on distributing the fiat shekels emanating from the Federal Reserve, which altogether is what“annihilates culture, tradition and aesthetics”.Back circa 1875-1900, when ackshual White Christians were still the captains of industry in this nation, I don’t know of anyone*** who promoted the annihilation of culture nor tradition nor aesthetics.Annihilation of culture & tradition & aesthetics is an almost purely j00ish pasttime.===============[***With the possible exception of s0d0mites such as John Milton Cage & Merce Cunningham.][I have mixed feelings about John Singer Sargent & Thomas Eakins.]But it’s been a full century now of j00ish dominance of the “culture, tradition and aesthetics”..
3g4me #405994 May 21, 2024 8:20 pm 4
Ostei: Thank you – my husband said to tell you that he knows he married a smart woman. And Steve, I did marry a smart man. But neither of us is always right. In this instance, without giving away too much personal information, I understand my husband’s point of view because that’s what he does all day – he’s involved in multiple, individual commercial transactions daily. He’s honest and fair, but wants to make his employer money as well as provide value to his customer. He’s neither a naif nor a shark – and he believes (correctly in his case) that any governmental involvement in the form of licensing, etc., would be unnecessary and intrusive.But there’s ‘the rub’ – HE may be both honest and shrewd, but not everyone else in his business – or any business – is. And the soft part of the White western heart wants everything to be fair, and doesn’t like to see either little old ladies or merely stupid people being taken advantage of. There is always the demand to make things ‘right.’ But caveat emptor is a real thing, in any transaction, and it’s not therole of governmentregulation to protect people from their own naivete or lack of due diligence.How to do this without government intrusion? I don’t know. How to do this without a homogeneous, Christian, White population? Impossible.
Steve #406105 May 22, 2024 1:08 pm -1
I meant for there to be a wink emoticon on that. No idea why my phone didn’t put it on, and it was a pain in the butt to find it. Maybe that emoticon doesn’t translate from Android? My big complaint, I guess, is that our “big White western heart” always chooses to empower the one who screws up everything it touches, government. That there’s a government seal of approval gives people a false sense of security. Health, economy, money, environment, immigration, domestic and international policy, etc., what have they done a good job on?
right2remainviolent #405791 May 21, 2024 9:55 am 8
Exactly. My working thesis is that capitalism and communism are twisted mirror images of each other.
Gespest #405793 May 21, 2024 9:58 am 2
It’s muh Creative Destruction in operation!
Tired Citizen #405781 May 21, 2024 9:45 am 17
“It is why we used to hunt down and punish corruption and fraud. Note we no longer do that.” correct. Instead our government is busy hunting down normal people who have said the “n” word.
Paintersforms #405760 May 21, 2024 9:01 am 17
I’m an American, I’m not a communist, and I’m supposed to love capitalism, but looking at how things turned out in practice, I’ll say this: Communism is moral to a fault. It punished people and ground itself down in a purity spiral. Capitalism is immoral (I’d say to a fault, but that might be redundant lol). It’s become a free-for-all and is exploding itself in a filth spiral. I want to say both outcomes are the result of being ideological instead of practical.
Steve #405779 May 21, 2024 9:40 am 0
If you are Christian or even Paulian, capitalism is not immoral. “Thou shalt not steal” has no meaning without the notion of private property. The Commandment(s) about coveting your neighbors stuff means nothing if he’s not permitted to own stuff.
Jannie #405799 May 21, 2024 10:12 am 5
Yes, and what about Jesus Christ’s Parable of the Talents?
Steve #405811 May 21, 2024 10:29 am -3
Good point. Probably more appropriate in this case, too, because I think @Paintersforms said he is a New Testament Christian who puts special emphasis on the red words. (Full disclosure: I was too, a decade or two ago, until I started really pondering what those red words were saying.)
Paintersforms #405825 May 21, 2024 10:58 am 5
Markets, private property, saving and investing, etc., all predate capitalism by, what, at least a couple thousand years? I’ve often wondered why it took so long to give it a name, or if the name refers to something other than the things we all like. Then I see looting, lying, liquidation, and perversion, and I figure whatever this capitalism thing is must be immoral.
Steve #405859 May 21, 2024 12:01 pm -5
Depends on definitions. As I use the term, markets, private property, saving and investing, etc.arecapitalism. Basically, you can do whatever you like with your stuff (caveats, yes) and reap either the gains or losses, depending on your acumen and luck.
TomA #405820 May 21, 2024 10:44 am 16
I ask . . . is there any realistic solution to this parasitic cancer that does not involve hard measures? Does anyone still think that the traditional institutional mechanisms of correction still function as they should? Look at the farce of the current Trump prosecution in New York. A former president is on trial for a non-crime and everyone knows that this is a politically motivated persecution. And yet there are no protests in the streets. The spring winds tighter however.And when in snaps, its not going to be pretty. Don’t take it out on your neighbor just because it’s convenient. Focus on the root of the problem. It’s worth the extra effort. And it’s the right thing to do.
Mycale #405788 May 21, 2024 9:53 am 16
Like E. Michael Jones says, capitalism is state-sponsored usury. When the moneychangers engage in the behavior Z describes, it is a killing blow for any company. All of them – 100% – will die either sooner or later, because the debt is totally impossible to service. This behavior is disastrous for the businesses, horrible for the people who work at the businesses, terrible for the local communities, but is not just accepted by the government but encouraged and subsidized. You end up destroying the real, actual economy, the business of making and selling stuff, and walk away with a bunch of fake paper.The party can’t go on forever though and it ended in countries like Greece, Iceland, Ireland, and Japan in the past 30 years. It will happen here too. We are already starting to see the consequences, in the Donbass, of caring less about making stuff than pushing paper around.
Steve #405800 May 21, 2024 10:13 am -7
E. Michael Jones is a crank. He’s like a stopped clock. Not 100% of companies will go bankrupt because of debt service. Those without debt will not only do fine, but will also be able to hoover up assets at pennies on the dollar, or possibly even less. I’m looking forward to it. Those with a Biblical worldview (“…the borrower is servant to the lender”) or a Shakespearean influence (“Neither a borrower nor a lender be” etc.) won’t fall for the financialization schtick in the first place.
Drive-By Shooter #405817 May 21, 2024 10:39 am 4
Those without debt will not only do fine, but will also be able to hoover up assets at pennies on the dollar, or possibly even less. I’m looking forward to it. I’m looking forward to it. Feel free to tell us where you stand with vulture capitalism. Those witha Biblical worldview…won’t fall for the financialization schtick in the first place. Neither do the vulture capitalists of carrion capitalism.
Steve #405862 May 21, 2024 12:09 pm -7
Define “vulture capitalism”. If you mean someone who made the decision to avoid debt and is in a position to profit from those who were just after a fast buck by borrowing at 1%, knowing that could never last, I’m all for it. Foolish people should be punished for making foolish mistakes. Otherwise you just create more fools.
Steve #405879 May 21, 2024 1:26 pm -3
If it bothers you, consider who it is that lent out the money. The guy who goes out of business gets a hit on his credit rating (and rightfully so) but it’s the banker who is out the cash. Why does it bother you that the guys doing the financialization are the ones hurt by “vulture capitalism”?
Tars Tarkas #405946 May 21, 2024 4:20 pm 3
They aren’t out anything. They printed (Virtually. they don’t even have the ink and paper costs) the money and then took possession of the real thing when the printed money couldn’t be paid back. The (((bankers))) make out like bandits.
Steve #405968 May 21, 2024 5:19 pm -4
Who did this? There are not many who create currency out of thin air. The treasury when it issues bonds, and arguably the Fed when it allows fractional reserve. But the banker must comply with GAAP. A $10k loan (asset) must have an offsetting $10k liability, which is generally owed to the Fed. But the banker is out the full amount if the debtor walks away. That’s why they bother with collections services.
Steve #406109 May 22, 2024 1:11 pm -1
Bankers will be so happy that they no longer have to follow GAAP…
Drive-By Shooter #405813 May 21, 2024 10:33 am 4
Commenter Steve writes that Capitalism, Inc. (i.e. rootless irresponsibility capitalism) is Christian, too, and he is correct. Christian motives to support it are not difficult to understand. It’s rapacious Christians’ greed, of course, but Capitalism, Inc., has been helpful for subsidizing missions, church construction, congregation formation, and related unnecessary activity. Christianity would turn the Earth’s land and seas into a wasteland on the pretext bamboozling humanity to accept a phony salvation.Meanwhile Jewish supremacy can look on with grudging approval, understanding full well that Christianity has been a useful, manipulable stalking horse for more than 1,000 years. Sects of Jesusism, while theologically repugnant to the pious believer of torahs, do normalize Israelite supremacy, patriarchy, and superstition. Christianity destroys other cultures and religions whether good or bad, ultimately for the benefit of Israel’s own and its ancient project of snatching everything.
Steve #405884 May 21, 2024 1:36 pm -5
There’s a lot of truth there. Mainstream Christianity (more correctly, Paulianity) has a lot to answer for. Certainly they seem to be piling up treasures on earth. Just look at all the cathedrals and extravagant churches. How many set up in a Morton Building? I know of a couple, but most squander every penny they can. And they preach questionable doctrine, e.g., tithing. I do think it’s appropriate to distinguish between Christians and Christianity, Inc., though.
Captain Willard #405789 May 21, 2024 9:53 am 15
We can deal with bankrupt restaurants, but F-35s that cannot fly could be a serious problem some day. The flip side is that F-35s that cannot fly cannot be used for additional stupid, expensive wars. It’s possible that we wasted $1 Trillion on these crappy planes but that functional planes may have ended up costing us $3 trillion in new wars. Pentagon efficiency haha…
CFOmally #405815 May 21, 2024 10:36 am 13
I guess I’m part of the problem. After spending my working life building a mom and pop service business I began to look for a way to retire, and a corporate buyout offered more than a private buyout. So I did it and stayed on running the place for a few years as a transition. At first they were pretty hands off and the place continued to do well. Then after a couple years the mid level management (girl bosses of both sexes) just couldn’t keep their hands off a good thing. Growth and profits are down for the first time ever. They like to blame efficiency and staffing but not admitting that nobody wants to work for them, and/or work hard for them. I’m leaving at the end of the year. It will limp on for a while, but at 50% of what it was doing. What really ticks me off is the business became a vital part of the community, that’s been destroyed. The same PE bought 12 other businesses (no real estate) in my area, 4 of them have been shuttered. It is a flim flam game.I do think that for you younger gents out there, the corporate world and the government world is a dead end. But there are opportunities in small business.
TempoNick #405842 May 21, 2024 11:34 am 8
“corporate world and the government world is a dead end.”Mixed feelings on this. You do well with salary and the fact that they cover healthcare. The problem is, once you hit 50 and you’re making too much salary, you have a target on your back at budget time.I think the other issue is about the way your wired personally. It seems like you have to be kind of a player, making friends within any given organization, to get ahead. It’s performance as well, no doubt. It also takes the same skills that it takes to be popular in high school.
Intelligent Dasein #405849 May 21, 2024 11:45 am 10
Thank you for nicely illustrating the point that it is useless to blame individuals for cashing out and useless to blame the system for strip-mining regions of low entropy for a quick gain. Any individual and any system is vulnerable to this, because it’s just the way life works.There isn’t anything you can do to stop it in principle, but people should be made to understand that if you want to have honest institutions that work, or deeply rooted businesses competently managed by those with skin in the game, then occasionally somebody has to sacrifice for them. Somebody has tonotreap their due gains in exchange for keeping the social organs functioning as they should. There is no shortcut and no second option. The stability of society exists in direct proportion to the gratification that was deferred on its behalf. That is the true price of peace, and somebody, somewhere, has always had to pay it, though not necessarily the same person who enjoys the dividends.
Steve #405871 May 21, 2024 12:47 pm 0
Any individual and any system is vulnerable to this, because it’s just the way life works. Pretty cynical. Moreso than I am, even. We used to have things like silent partners and contracts for deed back in the day when a man could transfer his business to his progeny or, failing that, to an ambitious neighbor kid. That system was not vulnerable, precisely because there was no low-hanging fruit to loot. Every asset had an offsetting liability, otherwise double entry bookkeeping wouldn’t work. The real problem started when it became legal to use fictional entries to offset legitimate entries.
Ostei Kozelskii #405927 May 21, 2024 3:11 pm 8
In other words, somebody has to live for something other than the almighty buck. There must be more to their life than getting filthily rich. I wholeheartedly agree.
Steve #405938 May 21, 2024 3:58 pm -6
That’s the great thing about what I mean by capitalism, though. You get to match your actions to your values. Getting filthy rich in my definition of capitalism means you have satisfied a crapton of the wants and desires of your fellow men. Would a system be better which encouraged you not to meet their needs?
Ostei Kozelskii #405952 May 21, 2024 4:27 pm 5
You may have met their needs in some way, but, rather than reap the ultimate billion-dollar windfall, you must continue meeting their needs as you always have. That means “settling” for being a multi-millionaire rather than a billionaire.
Steve #405975 May 21, 2024 5:32 pm -8
but, rather than reap the ultimate billion-dollar windfall, you must continue meeting their needs as you always have. As our host, @Zman, preaches, “Says who?”
Ostei Kozelskii #406039 May 22, 2024 9:55 am 1
Says me and many, many other critics of capitalism. The Invisible Hand is the shadow of Molloch.
Steve #406107 May 22, 2024 1:10 pm -3
Then you sate their needs. What’s stopping you?
3g4me #405993 May 21, 2024 8:04 pm 5
ID: I think this is the best comment you’ve ever made here. And you are exactly correct: Someone needs to take less than maximum profit if there is to be anything to accrue as social capital. Someone needs to sell his house to someone who would be a good neighbor,rather than the Cali refugee who offers double the value in cash, sight unseen. But we all, also, believe we ought to have the right to dispose of our personal property as we see fit – even if that then results in strip-mined neighborhoods instead of solid, integral communities.There is always a cost, and no one wants to be the one to pay.
Lineman #405996 May 21, 2024 9:29 pm 4
There is always a cost, and no one wants to be the one to pay.Why do you think we continue to be ruled by ones that hate us and want us dead…
SouthPoll #405734 May 21, 2024 8:26 am 13
Like many of your posts this strikes hard, and brings a sense of sadness for the situation we are in. That said most or even all militaries operate as grifting machines in peace. Russia and China have had that problem too. Witness Prigozhin’s commentary and now the restructuring of military leadership. The difficulty is in assessing a military’s effectiveness without engaging in combat.It would appear that the US would have an edge as its had a number of engagements over the past 30+ years. Operation Desert Storm seemed to demonstrated that the US military was at peak operating form – and seemed to show the soviet produced equipment poorly. It has operated with that aura of invincibility ever since, despite the fact that all of these opponents are sub-peer.One more thought. America is about advertising with all that is good and bad about that. It’s been our advantage and it’s also seeming to be our downfall.
Wkathman #405730 May 21, 2024 8:17 am 13
To use a cringeworthy pun . . . Zman is right on the money with today’s essay.
Vizzini #405828 May 21, 2024 11:02 am 12
The usual suspects are going to ruin the town of Harpers Ferry with a development project that will make them money, but come at the expense of the residents. Sounds like a job for Killdozer.
Ostei Kozelskii #405929 May 21, 2024 3:18 pm 0
There’s actually a pretty decent band called Killdozer. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O56wJadwXeU
RealityRules #405785 May 21, 2024 9:50 am 11
We have been in the looting phase for a long time. Perhaps what we are now entering is the hyper-looting phase.At this point any critique to be effective should be naming names. For example, with the Invasion phase of TGR saying Biden or The Democrats isn’t effective. What is needed are the names and interlocking directory and payment receipts of all involved.The DS bureaucrats, the NGO heads and staffs, the church pastors and boards of directors … … The receipts are there. We need short but sweet exposes ready-made for Twitter.The same is true of every grift happening in this shopping mall.Of course top priority is educating the kids as the culture and its institutional transmission mechanisms have probably already collapsed. Well, no, they’ve been so subverted that they are aimed at remaking the dispossessed a broken part of the ghoulash.
Paul Gottfried #405796 May 21, 2024 10:05 am 10
In 1543, this guy saw the emergence of “blood sucker economy” from the movement he started – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/On_the_Jews_and_Their_Lies
Jeffrey Zoar #405784 May 21, 2024 9:47 am 10
I remember in the late 1980s when Gordon Gekko was seen as a role model by many. I’m pretty sure that’s not what Oliver Stone intended. Which raises the question of who or what corrupted whom. Did the system corrupt the people or did the people corrupt the system? Not being a big believer in isms one way or the other, I’m leaning to the latter. Coincidentally, this was one generation after prayer was taken out of schools. Which in and of itself is just a data point, but is one indicator of a societal shift from transcendent values to material ones. And in a society based on material values, which somewhere along the way we definitely became, a bust out is both moral and right.
Steve #405795 May 21, 2024 10:03 am 4
I think it’s like @Zman’s essay yesterday(?) — the manager selection criteria changed. True, it started with a change in the laws such that corporate raiders became possible, and was exascerbated by the inflation of the ’70s, but ultimately, there would be no vulture capitalists if there were no people with morally-casual attitudes who are willing to destroy others’ lives for a buck.
Alan Smithee #405829 May 21, 2024 11:02 am 10
Stone’s Gekko was a three-dimensional character, an increasingly endangered species in all the arts and nearly extinct on the big screen. But I think Ellis’s Patrick Bateman captured the actual spirit of the age we are in much better. Especially when you consider that it is deliberately unclear whether any of his story is actually taking place anywhere outside his own imagination. This is a disturbing observation, but there it is.
Jack Dobson #405851 May 21, 2024 11:49 am 7
Spot on. The United States is Patrick Bateman with advanced AIDS now.
Arshad Ali #405897 May 21, 2024 2:07 pm 4
Gekko was based on real-life characters who created and promoted ‘high-yield securities’ (i.e., junk bonds) like Ivan Boesky, who ended up in prison. I think it was Boesky who said ‘Greed is good’ at a Princeton graduation ceremony (the audience cheered). In the movie, Gekko says the same thing.
Ostei Kozelskii #405928 May 21, 2024 3:16 pm 5
As it turns out, there’s little more evil, or at minimum profoundly foolish, than greed.
Abelard Lindsey #405739 May 21, 2024 8:41 am 9
Definitely one of the better postings here. David Stockman wrote a book about this phenomenon some years back called “The Great Deformation”.
J Ribble #405990 May 21, 2024 6:58 pm 8
Tim Hortons in Canada was taken over by private equity several years ago. Still busy in places but it’s gone decidedly downhill. The all-Canadian marketing doesn’t work anymore, and so many franchises have been bought up by subcontinentals. Their customer service is usually dreadful
Tom K #405797 May 21, 2024 10:08 am 8
The Communists made Capitalism work in China so I don’t know what that means except maybe there’s a fine line between the two in practice. The Chinese found they had to reserve a bullet for every capitalist to make it work lol. The Usual Suspects didn’t get to worm their way into the transition in China so it didn’t turn into a disaster there like it did in Russia. It took a Putin to shake off the fleas in Russia but that wasn’t inevitable, it was the Big One that got away. Maybe that’s why the neocons are in such a stink about Russia. I don’t know if critiquing these “big ideas” like Capitalism and Communism really gets you anywhere. Capital always needs a home, but I would say if we eliminate the Corporation as a routine registration thing and return it to the discretion of a legislature, a charter system, that would go a long way to purging the worst excesses.
Alfred #405995 May 21, 2024 8:45 pm 7
You would have to admit, scenes of hugely obese negro women dressed in super tight clothing, with huge fake eyelashes and wigs, chowing down on enormous plates of “skrimps”, is a very funny image.
Ostei Kozelskii #406041 May 22, 2024 9:58 am 0
Now that’s what I call black humor…
Arshad Ali #405924 May 21, 2024 3:05 pm 7
In the capitalist utopia of the future, we will be making and trading financial ‘products.’ And no-one will be making anything real. And no matter how successful you are as a financial ‘entrepreneur’, you won’t be able to buy anything real with your fiat billions, because there will be nothing real to buy. In other words a once real economy that made and traded real things will converge to the board game ‘Monopoly.’
steve w #405982 May 21, 2024 5:52 pm 7
As long as there exists real private wealth in the United States, thefinancialization of everythingmakes sense. Millions of Americans retain real wealth – in land, in homes, in automobiles, in investments and savings – which effectively “back the dollar”, much as the gold holdings at Fort Knox and elsewhere supported the dollar when the gold standard operated. Add to this the considerable capital value of lands held by the Federal government itself, with its mining and timber rights, etc., and the motivation for piracy by “stakeholders” both private and public becomes clear.Our “Social Capital” is of course the real prize, for “hometown” bandits. We can’t blame the diversity for regional developers turning 200 acres of woods and fields into rows of 3000 sq ft homes on cul-de-sacs called “Walden Springs Lane”, “Rabbit Run” and “Hidden Valley Estates”. Nor can they be held responsible, when local farmers lease massive fields to solar power startups, either.Take my town for example. It is one of those pretty little villages in western New York that are well within range of the commute into the nearby city, with a “good school” (wink wink), little to no crime, a locally-owned grocery store, pleasant streets and neighbors, active and not altogether woke churches, and such like. Village government is open and honest and pays attention to costs. So; how does a banditfinancializethis happy place? Why, by building a 120-house development on one of the last remaining strips of open land on the edge of the village! A home in an idyliic village! Great school! Great people! Builder boy walks off with a million or two in profit, on to his next rape of an “idyllic community”. Meanwhile our sewage system needs expansion, our school will naturally demand more “resources” (which in fairness it will do anyway), the village loses much of its character, and maybe it’s time now to lock our doors at night.Private profit, public cost, as Z has said many times. It’s not just the diversity…
Arshad Ali #405991 May 21, 2024 6:58 pm 3
Same thing in my neck of the woods — social capital has been pillaged by private developers.
Jeffrey Zoar #405992 May 21, 2024 7:36 pm 4
well, typically it’s the “open and honest” village government that supplies the permits
Paintersforms #405997 May 21, 2024 9:36 pm 2
PA has state zoning laws— you have to open up a certain amount to residential, commercial, industrial development. So my dad tells me, he’s involved in this stuff. There’s only so much fight local government can put up, and mine does, thankfully. Real estate is a huge part of the US economy. Build, baby, build.
davidcito #405934 May 21, 2024 3:51 pm 6
I remember when red lobster and other big chain restaurants came into our suburb back in the 80s. My boomer parents didn’t realize, but the low prices were putting mom & pop restaurants out of business. Fast forward 30 years, and now the big chain restaurants are too expensive for my dad, they’re filled with ‘mullen johns’ and he can get a cheaper meal at the new mom & pop diners lol. Even if the big chain restaurants are franchises, possibly owned by a local, I see franchise owners as not having the same kind of soul or connection to the local culture as the mom & pop shops.
RealityRules #405865 May 21, 2024 12:14 pm 6
Read the Harper’s Ferry development story. Here is how the International Shopping Mall and Tourism Zone – NA 2 works.Do you really think that the story in the WSJ last week targeting West Virginia for mass immigrant invasion is unrelated? I doubt it. Some financier connected to some 5-start hotel and resort conglomerate bribed the hardline Conservative who is suddenly concerned with getting money for WV schools. The WSJ is doing its part to flood West Virginia with maids, landscapers, heavily accented anti-America (I mean pro ISM Tourism Zone NA2-WV1), docents, wait staff … … so that these resorts can support the new economy.The one positive is that this is one piece of the ISM TZ-NA2 pre-history that will not be erased. You have a crazed white man who committed an act of terrorism and who did it in the name of freeing black slaves. Now if that doesn’t support the narrative in many ways, what doesn’t. Oh and you have a hotel that can feature a black proprietor and an all black staff as its historical origins by putting up those phony retro black and white photos in fake oxidized frames. Heck! Go all the way and dress the all-Haitian staff up in antebellum plantation ware.Silver linings!
Tars Tarkas #405798 May 21, 2024 10:11 am 6
Profit used to be the yardstick of efficiency. Profit was proof you were combining land, labor and capital in an efficient way and which satisfied a market demand. If you were generating a loss, that meant you were doing something in an inefficient way or not satisfying a market demand and squandering land, labor and capital. Red Lobster really went downhill in the early-mid 90s. I stopped eating there a long, long time ago.
Jeffrey Zoar #405805 May 21, 2024 10:19 am 6
Local restaurants fail for a variety of reasons, often from starting out with too much debt, but I can’t think of a once successful chain restaurant that failed without the food turning to crap many years earlier. But it’s possible that the food issue was just a symptom of the bust out, cost cutting on ingredients to maximize profit.
Steve #405827 May 21, 2024 11:01 am 6
And dividends was the way that profit was communicated to investors. You could weed out pretty much all junk on just a history of dividends, and a quick scan of their line card. Of course, that didn’t cause enough financialization so Congress, in their infinite wisdom, chose to change the tax structure on “unearned” income to incentivize phony capital gains that could be exploited by big players and the stock option set.
Tars Tarkas #405864 May 21, 2024 12:13 pm 7
And 401ks would ensure lots of money flowed into the market. Which begs the question what is going to happen in a few more years when all of the boomers are retired and want to move their assets to less risky investments? Will there be enough funny money to buy up all the assets they want to sell?While totally unrelated, lots of 60s cars and car part stashes are coming onto the market while classic cars are still booming with lots of boomers still bidding them up. I think there will be a crash in anything and everything boomer related in the next 10-20 years. The oldest boomers are hitting 79 this year. You have to wonder what will happen to all the boomer real estate too.
Steve #405872 May 21, 2024 12:59 pm -4
Will there be enough funny money to buy up all the assets they want to sell? No/yes. The price is what it is. You have to wonder what will happen to all the boomer real estate too. Same thing that happened to silents’ real estate. It will be subject to re-valuation, and the heir will have to decide whether to sell or pay the higher tax. In the case of multiple heirs, it’s almost certainly going to be sold. Early boomers should be fine, late boomers, not so much, but millenials, maybe late X and on are sitting pretty.
Tars Tarkas #405877 May 21, 2024 1:19 pm 6
The Silents were not facing the same predicament. The silents had a huge generation behind them to buy anything they were selling. The Boomers have X behind them which is far smaller than boomers. Millennials are also a large generation, but they will be a lot younger than the Boomers were when the Silents were selling. They just don’t have the money. Time will tell, I guess.
Steve #405895 May 21, 2024 2:06 pm -3
The silents had a huge generation behind them to buy anything they were selling. The Boomers have X behind them which is far smaller than boomers. Right. So when silents passed, because there were more boomers than houses, there was a bidding war for property, i.e., rising house prices. When Boomers start passing, there will be more properties with fewer buyers, i.e., falling house prices. This will be exacerbated by stock market declines, so Boomers might be in the case of selling housing at a loss just to pay medigap premiums.
Jeffrey Zoar #405881 May 21, 2024 1:31 pm 6
Harley Davidson’s stock price reflects this. Worth half what it was 10 years ago. It’s going to get worse.
Ostei Kozelskii #405931 May 21, 2024 3:22 pm 8
Looks like somebody’s no longer living so high on the Hog…
Xman #405911 May 21, 2024 2:27 pm 7
As one of the earliest of the Gen Xers, I have been worried about this for years. If I were to get in on the real estate and stock market Ponzi schemes, I’d be the first one to get fucked when the Boomers all cash out. My strategy has always been to stay out of debt, avoid conspicuous and frivolous consumption, pay cash and settle for guaranteed returns on things like Treasuries for 5%. It is sometimes difficult to watch the Boomers getting free money in the stock Ponzi or in inheritances while I count pennies, though.
Steve #405922 May 21, 2024 2:54 pm 1
It’s a worry for sure, and I’m speaking as one of the tail end of the boomers. As another blogger says, you make money on the purchase not on the sale. From the point of view of whether Boomers crash the market, you probably have the better part of a decade before it becomes much of a threat. But sounds like you are primed to take advantage of it when it happens. Good luck!
Tars Tarkas #405930 May 21, 2024 3:19 pm 5
It’s a great time to get into funeral homes. The baby boom turns into the funeral boom. Just like how so many toy stores and toy makers went bankrupt after the boom, schools were built and abandoned, discotheques peaked and then crashed, now the funeral home business will have a death boom followed by a crash. Me also being early gen-x, it sounds kind of attractive.
Lineman #405943 May 21, 2024 4:14 pm 4
Go long on cemetery plots then…
Ostei Kozelskii #405953 May 21, 2024 4:30 pm 2
Hmm. I may have to check around and see if there are any good death ETFs out there…
Lakelander #405944 May 21, 2024 4:18 pm 3
Was in the west Phoenix last month visiting the boomer parents. Was amazed at all the new build subdivisions going up. What most interested me was that boomers are now building giant RV garages on their new, colossal houses (for maybe 2 people). This begs the question; when they start dying off en masse, who’s going to want these monstrosities? The boomers are the undisputed champs when it comes to malinvestment, but I suppose the old mantra holds true: Whoever dies with the most toys, wins
Steve #405987 May 21, 2024 6:32 pm -3
I do sympathize with them. Sure, they don’t *need* a house that big, but they *do* need to to reinvest the capital gains they got holding their old house for 30, 40+ years. Well, either that or pay a third or more of it to government. So if you bought a house in 1970 for the unimaginable sum of 100k, sold in 2024 for $1.2 million, you need to bury $1.1 mil in a house just to preserve your estate for your kids. Who won’t appreciate it anyway…
mmack #405966 May 21, 2024 5:13 pm 4
While totally unrelated, lots of 60s cars and car part stashes are coming onto the market while classic cars are still booming with lots of boomers still bidding them up.Anything with a stick shift is going to sit on the lot or go for fire sale prices since the vast majority of people can’t drive and don’t want a manual transmission.Alternatively a lot of Zoomer kids are going to be staring at the ass-end of gramp’s Boss Mustang, Camaro Z-28, or Hemi ‘Cuda in their garage as nobody can meet the asking price they’re sure they’d get at Mecom or Haggarty.
Steve #405973 May 21, 2024 5:24 pm 2
True. Go look for a Chevy K-5 Blazer in decent condition and you’ll probably shell out 12-15 grand for it. People want them now as post emp vehicles.
TempoNick #405792 May 21, 2024 9:57 am 6
“Nothing of value has been created by investors buying up this restaurant chain.” While I agree with most of your article, that’s only one side of the coin. Remember, Darden sold this dog to private equity. They were at least theoretically able to cash out and redeploy the money they received to their more profitable concepts like Olive Garden, Longhorn and Ruth’s Chris.
Alex #405988 May 21, 2024 6:35 pm 5
What’s going on isn’t “capitalism,” it’s America. They are going to turn Harper’s Ferry into a theme park, with the locals as extras, but extras who pay them by fixing up the houses and paying taxes. If they are lucky. Probably some racial stuff too. They wouldn’t do it if it was a black town.
Kralizec #405921 May 21, 2024 2:53 pm 5
Isn’t this what Mitt Romney’s Bain Capital does?
Xman #405880 May 21, 2024 1:28 pm 5
“…we used to hunt down and punish corruption and fraud. Note we no longer do that.” Sure “we” do! Trump is on trial right now for “fraud,” LOL.
miforest #405868 May 21, 2024 12:27 pm 5
here is a great example of how destructive this ishttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UatnTSwEUoc
Paul Gottfried #405806 May 21, 2024 10:20 am 5
John Michael Greer has been writing about the same economic problems for the last few weeks. He calls it “lenocracy”. https://www.ecosophia.net/beyond-lenocracy/https://www.ecosophia.net/the-secret-of-the-sages/https://www.ecosophia.net/walking-away-from-the-marketplace/
Phineas McSneed #405874 May 21, 2024 1:08 pm 5
I like JMG overall, but his lenocracy coinage is dumb. He keeps emphasizing that the basis of it is that pimps take a cut of prostitutes’ pay without providing any service, which is ridiculous. Pimps provide security. Prostitution is illegal so they can’t get legal security or count on johns being afraid of cops or social sanctions, so the hookers are in grave danger of being beaten or killed at any time. Pimps definitely provide a service.
Paul Gottfried #405896 May 21, 2024 2:06 pm 3
I think you are supporting his argument that lenocrats exist from legal requirements.“That’s what makes our current situation a lenocracy: the power of the state gives their claims the force of law.”“Furthermore, this orgy of pimping is sponsored, controlled, and mandated by government at all levels and by the holders of political and economic power more generally. Thus, lenocracy.”He is not arguing that the laws were unnecessary in the first place. It is just that the regulatory burden keeps increasing over the years, because the government and big businesses benefit at the cost of small businesses.Speaking of prostitution being illegal at most places, making it legal can bring even worse side effects.https://dailycaller.com/2024/05/13/sex-work-labor-law-world-first-daan-bauwens-utsopi-belgium/“A new Belgian law passed earlier this month allows the government to mediate if employers of sex workers or the sex workers themselves complain that the sex workers refuse a client or a sexual act more than 10 times in six months.”
Steve #405985 May 21, 2024 6:06 pm 0
Thanks for the links and precis below. He could have chosen an illustration with a less visceral response, but at least we can all kind of understand what he means by it.
Arshad Ali #405794 May 21, 2024 10:01 am 5
Beautiful post. I’m away from home so difficult to type but you see your main points exemplified in the 1980s film, ‘Wall Street.’ Gordon Gekko is the avatar of predatory vulture capitalism. Ayn Rand taken to its logical conclusion. The profit motive itself is suspect. The ‘financialization of the economy’ was noticed and commented upon by post-Marxist theorists a century back (Kautsky, Hilferding).
Hokkoda #406005 May 22, 2024 7:36 am 4
“That was like, ‘oh my goodness, we can’t let that happen,’” Rucker said.(from the Harper’s Ferry story)Yes, how dare the people who live there decide what they’re going to allow.“I had never once spoken with SWaN or met [the Schaufelds] or had anything to do with them,” Rucker said. “But I went to the session that year thinking, basically, we need to figure out a way to fix this.”This really gets to the heart of things. It’s one of those lies that people tell when they’re guilty as sin. She very narrowly defines who she didn’t talk to. But Rucker – and the reporter – studiously avoid who she DID talk to. The lies these people tell just makes you want to explode.
Latter Day American #405861 May 21, 2024 12:06 pm 2
A businessman for a multinational/international corporation really ought to be perceived and treated exactly as a foreign prince would be treated in politics and elections, and it sucks this adaptation never happens. MNCs create an aristocracy that badly needs to be checked. NGOs/Nonprofits, same thing.The Trans-Pacific Partnership proposal presented an excellent example where business and trade interests eagerly craft provisions that will wreck a nation-state’s sovereignity and federalism when the time comes for their interest to stomp on any protection from that interest. It’s a shame TPP gets memoryholed because ending TPP is partly what made Trump an attractive candidate in 2016, against both Hillary and the Republigoobers.But it ain’t gonna happen in AINO
Brian #405841 May 21, 2024 11:32 am 2
This post illustrates why we are to be economic realists.
Steve #406118 May 22, 2024 1:52 pm -1
From your lips…
TempoNick #405814 May 21, 2024 10:35 am 2
One more thing: Think of private equity in these situations along the same lines as like when we used to say “Jew in the junkyard” as kids. They’re basically taking assets of questionable value and parting them out, just like junkyards do. You would think Darden would be smart enough to do this themselves, or maybe not. Not a good situation to be in as an employee, but maybe these deals exist for a reason. I do agree that it’s become more of an issue of the bankster tail wagging the dog these days, though.
Tom K #405802 May 21, 2024 10:17 am 2
At some time before the last glacial maximum, I actually liked Red Lobster. But that was when I was a child. I can remember when the lobsters in the tank weren’t the size of crawfish. I presently have the misfortune of having a wife and child who LOVE Red Lobster. Also Olive Garden. I dread to hear those words near special occasions these days.
Götterdamn-it-all #405984 May 21, 2024 5:56 pm 1
I’d just like to note that Mitt Romney was an adept of buying companies and breaking them up to sell the pieces. What became of the employees was none of his business. Voila! Capitalism.
Hoagie #406012 May 22, 2024 8:56 am 0
That’s not capitalism it’s something else. I really hate when people pick something bad in the economy and then blame it on capitalism. I’m a capitalist I’ve been a capitalist all my life and what capitalism is amounts to is picking a goal and working toward it financially.Blaming corporate raiding on capitalism is a pussy socialist way out. Breaking up companies and selling the pieces is more of a process of democracy than of capitalism. The extreme left in this country has everybody trained to blame everything that goes wrong on capitalism and anything that goes right is a socialist miracle. That’s all leftist propaganda.
Steve #406111 May 22, 2024 1:20 pm 0
Yep. Saw a meme over at WRSA the other day. Somehow they forgot the obvious “Leftist”, but it is what it is. Obviously there are non-Jews who also hold those worldviews, but it should give pause when you agree with (((them.))) At least re-evaluate your premises. Make damn sure they are valid, and not just some indoctrination you picked up along the way.
DYSPEPSIA GENERATION Blog Archive Blood Sucker Economy #405770 May 21, 2024 9:27 am 1
[…] ZMan peers behind the curtain. […]
Hi-ya #406047 May 22, 2024 10:04 am 0
But what about muh pencil? Without capitalism there would be no pencils.


Back to top