No, actually, the principal involved is that a scheming elite is twisting society into a shape that serves its own purposes, power and money. Imagine One world order. They, living in a shiny, glitzy city on a hill, the rest of us, downstream, poor, plebeian consumers of their trash. Imagine. Its easy if you try. No countries, no possessions, no greed or hunger, life in peace. A brotherhood of man. Imagine. All the people sharing all the world.

“Opening now for position as project manager at Xirlol Management Solutions Inc. Only castration passport holders need apply” lol

That’s sort of happening now, no? We have trannies, and this huge contradiction where people preach egalitarianism and equalitarianism while hierarchies and a caste system is more and more entrenched. It will be interesting to see if this sorting result in the children of the ruling class being given a traditional liberal education and the propaganda being forced on the middle and lower classes. Thus far, of course, it has been the opposite. But at some point the rulers will need their offspring to be something other than mentally retarded.

I confess, it may have been a lame joke but two down votes? Dayum!

Ron Klain Eff that mountain biker from Indianapolis. The Davos set way overestimated… Those assclowns have also completely overestimated the ability of AI and automation to do troubleshoot, maintenance, and repair work in every field.

How about that ginger press secretary babbling in an interview yesterday about loving “working for the President Obam….President Biden!”? Talk about a Freudian slip. Unreal. There is a “shadow president “, and it ain’t Cheeto. Not that the front man matters. It’s entrenched bureaucracies and billionaire influencers all the way down.

“They could have portrayed him as a kindly old man and whenever they put him out in public – have him at photo ops with little kids who talk with him on his lap like he’s santa or something.” Ummmm 😂Is this a troll?

Biden didn’t win.

Let’s toss the old chickenhawk groper out with some kindergardners, Feelin up some future voters is a win win.

Correct.The Kyle Rittenhouse affair was a learning experience for the dissident. The courts and law enforcement institutions have fallen and no longer work. If you ever have to defend yourself from the diversity and vibrancy of the establishment, or from their finger puppets – you do so with a mask. Conceal your identity. Do NOT involve the authorities or talk to them even as a witness. Don’t turn yourself in. Stay off social media. Do not cooperate with their inquiries or the courts. Shoot. Shovel. Shut up. Everyone knows you never talk to the press or the media.This regime is going to destroy itself, eventually. Sooner rather than later, the wheels are already falling off.

Perhaps even more onerous than most think. Look up the ancient meaning of “outlaw”. IIRC, in merry old England it meant a person “outside” the protection of the “law”, but also entailed an obligation for all men within the law to kill this person for the good of society.

Outlawry stopped being a thing after guns and modern policing. Once this becomes an issue , the results will simply be mass bloodshed. Freedom is having nothing to lose. Every seen John Q with Denzel Washington ? That’s the first stage “Choose a side, you are a target.” The second stage is ” I don’t eat? Nobody eats.” The third stage is Rwanda X Bosnia X Yemen And if you don’t find a way to fight? You deserve your death.

I’m not sure about this, but what I was able to glean from your post is that the government should be made larger. Or that we should talk about making the Federal government larger.I’d have to say no.The country–the world–was a much better–and happier–place when education was real and when it was lavished on those whose characters were strong enough and whose minds were tough enough not to be undone by the processes of book-learning.It was Alexander Pope, if memory serves me correctly, who pointed out that “a little learning is a dangerous thing” and went on to say, “therefore, DRINK DEEP.” But everybody ignored him. The results are ugly. And this is the fault of so-called “education” being handed out to all and sundry.The mass media should be shut down and its enablers sent to Devil’s Island. And there need be no replacement for it.We must get over the notion–I won’t call it an idea–that all men are created equal. That was wartime propaganda, but damned if folks don’t believe propaganda every time. Which is how we know that real education should not be thrust upon everybody willy-nilly.

Washington, the NY Times, Harvard and Hollywood–this is the Ministry of Enlightenment.

The universal term is anti-white psychosis. Its very similar to the large scale human sacrifices like the Aztecs but targeted at nominally ones own people. Of course the drivers are not allowed to be discussed as then you would realize its a war and we have been getting slaughtered (literally) for decades on the alter of our own empathy. The puppet whores who will sell their own into death are part of it, but the driver for this is obviously external to whites.

Oddly enough the USSA State Department has just confirmed that people who believe in traditional values are Russian assets.

When the Corporations are sovereign to the State, it is called Inverted Totalitarianism. Years ago, it was determined that, more or less, the corporations are inter-owned and managed by overlapping boards of directors:https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2051008/Does-super-corporation-run-global-economy.html

Excellent post. I also agree with your “Globohomo” hangups: these issues deserve indictment, not mockery.Maybe the biggest problem with a proper term for the West is that we utilize the wrong metrics to gauge the shifts in power. If we get a little playful and abstract (and, yes, therefore sloppy), perhaps, looking at the function of a society rather than worry about vocabulary, the parallels become interesting.It was one of the Rothschilds that said, I’m paraphrasing, “Allow me to issue and control the money, and I care not who makes its laws.” In the concept of Feudalism (of which I am a decent student of medieval literature), is it really that far off from the current metric when you consider that money was generally possessed and controlled by the king, his retainers, and the Church, and is largely symbolic of power? The lowly serf looks at a world in which he is excluded, with exchanges of money that he is not welcome to, with decisions that are outside his control. The average serf did not have money, but, rather, they had goods (after paying their taxes on land they rented). But, to extend one of the points of the podcast, money can be treated as an exchange market for power. I do not care to get into arguments about what constitutes money, but if we treat it, as Rothschild does (hey – who is a better authority on how the crooked world works?), money – in whatever form – is really a form of power.To extend to the current era, fiat currency seems to hold little interest for our overlords. They seem more interested in assets (just look at the cash big companies are burning through in acquisitions and the purchase of real estate and fine art) and they give us the fiat currency. Just like the feudal system, money (now assets) circulates among the rich, and we are left with basic goods (now – fiat currency).To extend it even further, a good portion of feudalism arose because of the breakdown of tribalism and its replacement with manorialism as a result of centralization of power. Anglo Saxon tribes in England (yes, unified under Cnut and Alfred, I get it, but not really stabilized), really became unified under the Normans. And the parallel with the rulership back then provides a striking relevance to the modern day: the rulers spoke a different language (literally) and lived in a different world. The disconnect between the administered population and the overlords represented the need for a stabilizing social force like the system of manorialism. The overlords distributed administration rights to their favorites and to recalcitrant tribal leaders who were willing to play ball, and these people became lords, and the lords kicked goods and money back to their king (after taking their fair share).The rise of the Catholic church served as a necessary component but also competitor of this power. The Church held knowledge and the spiritual side of things. Though there were many pissing contests, the overall grouping of the three estate system demonstrates that the majority of the elites colluded with the Church – and the Church, just like the lords, got their tithing. The education and the justification of the scholastics like Aquinas flattered the rulers and provided a mechanism to stabilize the system through morality.Of course, the Enlightenment fractured this into national identify, sort of the new tribalism. As we perceive the breakdown of national identity (I mean – wtf is an American anymore?! And we all know a Frenchman is now a Moroccan), the rise of a global cabal represents the establishment of a new overlord over disparate peoples. The individual politicians and nations are akin to the tribal leaders quickly becoming obsolete and jockeying to adopt new manners like the Victorian middle class.And, just as the Church did for the rulers of the Medieval, the tech oligarchs (sans borders – just like the Church) represent a stabilizing tool for the emerging global Feudalism. They indoctrinate the masses with the morality that stabilizes the system while getting filthy rich in the meantime. Of course, their ‘money’ is information as much as any dollar bill. Sure, there are pissing contests, but look at the exchange of information/ power. In January 6th, the commercial interested turned over their currency freely to the crooks in the FBI, and, most importantly, we are not welcome to know what they control. Those whores who refused to divulge their involvement in the 6th at Cruz’s questioning just reinforces that the currency circulates among them, not us (Yes – Cruz is a puke).Hell, we even have our own, ever simmering Crusade: retake the Holy S@#% land of Ukraine from the barbarian Putin! Good God, it’s like the resurrected Penda to fight our Oswald!We have the new three estate system. The emerging global government system is the ones who enforce the law, the commercial interests feed the spiritual needs of the populace (consumerism, now), and we are the 95% serfdom. Hell – can you even afford a house anymore? And it isn’t because the 95% of serfs are keeping demand high. Who were the two landholders in the Medieval era – the king and the Church.Sorry for the long rant; I’m off today as a kid of mine is sick, and I’m on daddy duty with a sick child who is mainly sleeping a fever off.As a final point, if you really want to see the striking parallels, read possibly the greatest work in the West, and certainly the greatest of the Middle Ages: The Canterbury Tales. You can find a parallel between every corrupt member of the administrative state (the Reeve and Squire, for example), to the Commercial enterprise/ the Church (the Pardoner, Summoner, Friar, etc.). Heck, even a few vapid, pretentious harlots in there (looking at you Kamala).Cheers!

Reverse. Those who have taken over are not us. They desired those you mention the same way snakes and spiders desire piles of old boards. Having multiple nations sharing the same land provides camouflage. Provides raw material of inter-group differences to weaponize.Managing multinational situations tends towards stature law as opposed to a traditional common law. Since they hold the center, they are centralizing power to the center. De-fund the [local] police, while building the FBI, et alWhere they don’t hold the center, they utilize local jurisdiction to gain toehold, to peel a label off from the corner. Like they way they chip at Russia via Ukraine, Syria, Belarus, Kazakhstan..

Perhaps more so, they simple want to be in charge, and then need to have control over us. The custodian model falls short. The don’t manage us because they want to keep us safe and secure. They need to control us so they can be on top. Sure, there are a large number of weak minded that believe in being cared for. But those who are at the top aren’t doing to protect us.There is this group, A D L; they drive the censorship. Protecting us on Facebook is a ruse they use to protect their control over society..

It is very difficult to map out what the real power centers and relations are. This is very different from the old times, say the 1930s. There you knew the people in charge. FDR was actually the center of government in the US, Hitler was actually in charge in Germany and Stalin the Soviet Union (even though Stalin, in what may actually be a semi-precursor to today, often did not hold particularly high STATE offices. But he held what he turned into, the highest party office.)Today it is messily confusing. It is obvious that Biden does not hold the cards in the US. But it is hard to say who does. Europe is little better. The leaders of all EU countries except Germany, are probably just meat puppets. The chancellor of Germany and the EU Commission seem to where official state power is really centered, despite the EU not actually being a state, which only adds to the confusion.Now emerging among dissidents on both sides of the Atlantic, is renewed focus on the World Economic Forum (WEF), the Davos crowd, and their ‘Great Reset’. Which may or may not be related to ‘Build Back Better.’ These are no doubt influential but how to do they relate to the office holders, or handlers, in DC, Brussels and Berlin? Well, kinda hard to tell. They seem to like to ski in the same place but how often do they talk shop?? And how do all of these relate to the ‘two boogeymen’, Russia and China?Then there’s a small fringe of dissidents, mostly in the US I think, that think that the cold war never ended, that giving up not just the Warsaw Pact but the Soviet Union itself, was just a ‘tactical withdraw’ from which to hammer us as our guards came down. J. R. Nyquist is one of the more eloquent spokesmen for this. It requires that you believe that Putin is a communist. And of course he is an old KGB hand. But what is he doing that is ‘communist’ or ‘Marxist’ in any sense? He is, as far as I can tell, hardcore anti-degeneracy. It is not illegal to be tutti frutti in Russia but it is illegal to promote it in schools. If you to be deviant, keep it in the bedroom and shut up about it. And he supports the Orthodox Church. What is Putin doing that is communist?? I can’t see it. He is even saying that the West’s policies are insane and leading to general population replacement. Which is not only factually true but is something that people evil enough to think is a good idea, would not want exposed. J. R. Nyquist’s conjecture, I just can’t fit it in, Putin’s KGB past notwithstanding.But the bottom line, power structures and relations today, are deliberately encrypted and very hard to make out.

I think it’s because the current rulers are actually a death cult in managerial drag. I find their actions far more logical when I think of them from that perspective.

the more trivial the problem the harsher the punishment What better way to demonstrate people’s utter powerlessness in the face of such intentional mendacity.

In earlier times by the time the children left the house, the eldest ones would be married so she would soon have grandkids to watch to keep her occupied until she passed away, surrounded by her loving family. Unfortunately men don’t go batty as often, but more lethargic a lot of the time as the meaning of their lives in their work no longer applies, and once retirement rolls around some seem to sit in their chair watching sports, just waiting to die. The natural order between old and young have been completely broken.

J. Greer mentions catabolic collapse, which outlines the way that human societies on the way down cannibalize their own infrastructure, maintaining themselves for the present by denying themselves a future. It’s easy to see resource depletion today, especially since things are getting colder (which wasn’t apparent in the 80s & 90s.) Weren’t seasons growing colder at the fall of Constantinople? I’m pretty sure they were since the Black Death, and at the fall of the Roman roads.