Skoolz are Brokin
I don’t have a lot of interest in the education. I think humans are born with a degree of natural intelligence. We are also born with certain broad personality traits. Both are inherited from our ancestors. The witch’s brew of DNA is that makes us what we are is set in the womb and there’s not a whole lot we (or anyone else) can do about it. With regards to education, kids will learn what kids want to learn to the level their abilities will allow. No system will change that.
Americans of the modern age reject the above as crime-think. Everyone is sure that the right schools, the right teachers and the right methods can make everyone above average, as George Bush put it. A lot of this is bound up in anti-racism, which is almost a religion all its own these days. By focusing on the schools and the methods, it allows everyone to ignore the students walking through the schoolroom door. Disparities in test scores become proof that everyone must redouble their efforts to “fix” the schools.
Anyway, this was in my twitter feed the other day. It is a long description of a private school by a public school teacher who has decided the public schools are not for his kid. The tone suggest the author is racked with guilt and searching for some reason why the private schools are so much better than the public school. Well, a reason that does not touch on the taboos that make frank discussion of education impossible. As a public school teacher, the author is required to promote all the whack-a-doodle ideas that define public education in America, but he loves his kid so he is in a tough spot.
The comments are hilarious as you see all the lunacy on display, with regards to education. This article was also in my twitter feed. It must be education week on twitter. The general thrust is that we need more data to come up with the perfect solution to education. This strikes me as another way to avoid the rushing reality of the classroom. We have mountains of data and everyone pretty much knows the truth, but mokita. The comment from Aida McAuly is why education policy is a dog’s breakfast of crackpottery.
The whole premise of this article is wrong. School should not be
about
“content”, that which can be measured with tests. Rather, it should
be
about inspiring curiosity, building empathy (which can be done with
mixed age, race, ethnicity and ability classrooms) and encouraging
exploration and collaboration. Those elements are the essence of
what
determine the quality of a human being’s life. I’m sorry to deflate
Wired’s fascination with everything technological, but unless we
begin
to look at education from a developmental perspective, which takes
into
account not just our brain, but our 5 senses, our need for movement,
choice in what we learn and when we learn it, being able to make
genuine
contributions to a learning community through purposeful work, we’ll
continue to chase our tails. Any by the way, if you are curious
about
what type of education offers engagement in all of these…go visit an
authentic Montessori classroom today. To the dismay of many of the
“data advocates” reading this article, you won’t find screens but
you
will see very happy, engaged children concentrating at extremely
high
levels for long periods of time.
There’s simply no way to include crazy people in the discussion without getting batshit crazy results, which is why our pubic schools are a dumpster fire.
To keep Z Man's voice alive for future generations, we’ve archived his writings from the original site at thezman.com. We’ve edited out ancillary links, advertisements, and donation requests to focus on his written content.
Comments (Historical)
The comments below were originally posted to thezman.com.
5 Comments